Rc f
04-02-15, 11:06 PM
#1
Rookie
Thread Starter
Rc f
Not getting good reviews. Is F reviews were the same. I think both cars are under rated. They are not race cars ,but they will go. m 3 ,c63 cts not race cars. Go to track and its all the driver. Its fun to have a sleeper car though. they dont get good press
04-03-15, 05:23 AM
#2
Driver
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: SC
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hm, that's weird. I recall a few great reviews for the IS F. I remember they said things about the weight of the vehicle and the speed vs the competition.
The Fs with exhaust and headers are more comparable to the M3 and C63.
I choose Lexus over both, I feel it's the most adult decision. I get my cake and eat it too... Just as fun as the C63, better build quality (IMO), and the Toyo reliability is the icing on top. The Germans are shakey to me, anymore.
The Fs with exhaust and headers are more comparable to the M3 and C63.
I choose Lexus over both, I feel it's the most adult decision. I get my cake and eat it too... Just as fun as the C63, better build quality (IMO), and the Toyo reliability is the icing on top. The Germans are shakey to me, anymore.
04-03-15, 11:02 PM
#5
Rookie
Thread Starter
Rc f
Im very happy with my is F. I would not trade it for the RC F right now. I do like how the car looks, but I'm hoping they will add a little more power in the next couple years.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post