Comparison of M4,RS5 and RCF by EVO
#1
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Comparison of M4,RS5 and RCF by EVO
HI All
Found this link at the bimmerpost site note sure were is the rest of the article.
scanned article below
Found this link at the bimmerpost site note sure were is the rest of the article.
scanned article below
Last edited by rominl; 01-28-15 at 03:17 PM.
#2
I will say the photograph is interesting with the two white cars--RS5 and RC-F--in the foreground with the black M4 in the background.
If anyone finds the article, please post a scan of it.
Last edited by rominl; 01-28-15 at 03:17 PM.
#6
I would say that the RS5 is the true winner here, not because of the track time ( AWD will always win on wet surfaces ) , rather beacuse the A5 series was introduced in late 2006 and the RS in 2009.
#7
I actually found it hard to determine a lot from the "benchmark." Rather, I see three quite different cars for three quite different buyers.
My question about this comparison is what options were on each car--in particular the brakes, differentials, and numerous other performance options? Some of this is apparent in the story, but much is missing.
As a "benchmark" this information should have been included.
But, I do love the photo of the flying F.
My question about this comparison is what options were on each car--in particular the brakes, differentials, and numerous other performance options? Some of this is apparent in the story, but much is missing.
As a "benchmark" this information should have been included.
But, I do love the photo of the flying F.
Trending Topics
#10
Driver School Candidate
I actually found it hard to determine a lot from the "benchmark." Rather, I see three quite different cars for three quite different buyers.
My question about this comparison is what options were on each car--in particular the brakes, differentials, and numerous other performance options? Some of this is apparent in the story, but much is missing.
As a "benchmark" this information should have been included.
But, I do love the photo of the flying F.
My question about this comparison is what options were on each car--in particular the brakes, differentials, and numerous other performance options? Some of this is apparent in the story, but much is missing.
As a "benchmark" this information should have been included.
But, I do love the photo of the flying F.
#11
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Thanks @rominl for the getting the rest of this great review , actually managed read it it on the EVO app and downloaded it onto my Newsstand.
#14
Forum Administrator
iTrader: (2)
They are right there at the bottom of the article with (option) beside them. For example the RCF has the TVD option and the M4 has ceramic brake option among others.
#15
What threw me off is that there was no direct reference to torque vectoring in the article itself, although there was a reference to oversteer. Upon enlarging the image of the cockpit, I did just see the control dial for the torque in the F.
Thanks