Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

Rear Turbo.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-28-13, 09:00 AM
  #31  
Gville350
Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Gville350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 11,568
Likes: 0
Received 430 Likes on 384 Posts
Default

TWIN 55 trim .60/.63 turbos would be a good setup; but probably not a good single turbo setup.
Old 12-03-13, 10:46 AM
  #32  
SH4DY
Rookie
 
SH4DY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Ballpark Math:
cubic inches*max rpm*.5*VE
1732
->
213.5*6500*.5*.9
1732
= 361 CFM (base)

Target Boost of 10psi (optimistic) = Pressure Ratio of:
10+14.7
14.7
= 1.68

Target Airflow = Base CFM*PR = 361*1.68= 607CFM*.075 = 45 lb/min

This should help when you're looking at compressor maps
Old 12-03-13, 11:52 AM
  #33  
shawnxjeon
Driver School Candidate
 
shawnxjeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like the trade in for ISF idea too.

But sounds like an interesting project I'd like to see results to.
Old 12-07-13, 01:10 PM
  #34  
Nsteezyy
Driver
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Nsteezyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Projects going to be on hold till spring. Snow in Utah is horrible!
Old 12-08-13, 07:37 AM
  #35  
mikellucci
Instructor
iTrader: (56)
 
mikellucci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 814
Received 28 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nsteezyy
Projects going to be on hold till spring. Snow in Utah is horrible!
Winter downtime is the perfect time to wrench on your car!!

As I layed beneath my car the other day I got to thinking about turbo location again:

What about a single turbo setup in the spot where the giant factory Resonator resides? Looks like a decent place to tuck a mid size turbo.. Just saying.. Again, when I started mocking up mounting locations where the rear mufflers reside things got real cramped real fast.
Old 12-08-13, 11:15 AM
  #36  
smokyis350
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (21)
 
smokyis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: california
Posts: 2,970
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stewb10
Yes. "low gains" for the money.

F-sport Exhaust: $1200 for 8whp + good sound = $150/hp

Supercharger: $5000 for 100whp + great sound = $50/hp

Wait really? 5k for 100WHP? I might have to take a look into supercharger if that's true. That means it will put the 350 in the 400WHP territory.

A stock IS350 ~265-270 WHP + exhaust ~10WHP + intake ~5WHP + PPE headers ~15WHP. IS350 with I/H/E should put it in the 290-300WHP alone.



Originally Posted by shawnxjeon
I like the trade in for ISF idea too.

But sounds like an interesting project I'd like to see results to.
I like that idea also. IS-F stock ~350WHP. with intake and exhaust they are in the 375-380WHP range.
Old 12-08-13, 11:20 AM
  #37  
mikellucci
Instructor
iTrader: (56)
 
mikellucci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 814
Received 28 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by smokyis350
Wait really? 5k for 100WHP? I might have to take a look into supercharger if that's true. That means it will put the 350 in the 400WHP territory.
Absolutely. What do you think we've been doing the last few years in Ohio?!!

There happens to be a rotrex in the classifieds as well......
Old 12-09-13, 10:49 AM
  #38  
WylieKylie
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
WylieKylie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: UT
Posts: 624
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nsteezyy
Projects going to be on hold till spring. Snow in Utah is horrible!
What, you new here? This is no-where near horrible yet!
Old 12-09-13, 11:17 AM
  #39  
e46m3lol
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
e46m3lol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Oh f*** I should have never opened up this thread!!!

Been thinking about doing a rear mounted turbo setup for a couple months now and this just gave me the motivation to actually do this! Just got the engine rebuilt a couple thousand miles ago so the internals are fresh. I do need to do some more research as far as tuning but I do have a local exhaust shop that can mock up and weld everything.
Old 12-10-13, 07:50 AM
  #40  
SH4DY
Rookie
 
SH4DY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/8268582-post59.html
Early indications are that these motors are tough.

Dedicated oiling system for the turbo and a well tuned piggy back and you should be in fat city.
I really want to try and fit at least a single GT4088R or a BW366. On our motors at low boost, both of these are at less than peak efficiency so cutting the I/C plumbing in half sounds like a good thing to me to minimize further losses.

Anyone know what the flow rates are on the stock port injectors? How about on the IS-F?
Has anyone verified flow rates of the stock vs IS-F fuel pumps?
Thinking the IS-F components may be a good option for headroom/ piece of mind...
Old 12-10-13, 12:21 PM
  #41  
Gville350
Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Gville350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 11,568
Likes: 0
Received 430 Likes on 384 Posts
Default

Anyone know what the flow rates are on the stock port injectors?

Specification of injectors for DI
Spray shape Dual-fan-shaped spray
Hole shape Two slit (W:0.52mm,H:0.13mm)
Pressure 4-13MPa
Injection rate 948cc/min @12MPa
Specification of injectors for PFI
Spray shape 12 Multiholes
Hole shape Multiholes (φ0.19*12)
Pressure 400kPa
Injection rate 295cc/min


How about on the IS-F?

Not sure about those; do they even use a DI setup?

Has anyone verified flow rates of the stock vs IS-F fuel pumps?

Supposedly the outlet on the IS-F fuel pump is larger; but no actually numbers to back anything up.

Thinking the IS-F components may be a good option for headroom/ piece of mind.

The fuel pump...yes. But on 6-7psi, the stock injectors and the factory ECU should be able to adjust to compensate (as many S/C owners have documented).
Old 12-10-13, 01:46 PM
  #42  
WylieKylie
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
WylieKylie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: UT
Posts: 624
Received 29 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gville350
How about on the IS-F?

Not sure about those; do they even use a DI setup?
Based on the fact that an IS F has an in-tank fuel pump and also an additional VERY expensive ($1,200+ list price) pump at the fuel rail I feel safe concluding that it is a DI motor. I feel much less safe assuming that the high pressure DI pump would work with the V-6. Wikipedia (yes, of course it is accurate!) lists the IS-F motor as a hybrid injection model just like the 350 motor.

As far as injectors go I wouldn't guess that the specs are that much different for the F than for an IS350, the F motor produces roughly 50hp per cyliner -- the same as an IS350, which indicates that injector flow rates could be similar. If that theory holds true (realizing I am going further and further out on a limb...) I wouldn't expect that an IS F pump would help even if it did fit, becuase it likely runs a similar pressure to the 350 motor at a higher volume (in order to feed 2 more injectors).

That was a bit of rambling, sorry
Old 12-10-13, 04:30 PM
  #43  
e46m3lol
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
e46m3lol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've spent my whole day at work today looking at various turbo's, intercoolers, piping dimensions and oil lines. One of my main concerns as someone else previously stated is the oil pressure situation. That is a long way back from the block to the rear of the vehicle and back. I was also reading on another forum that for every 1 ft of piping you lose 1 lb of boost. Is that accurate? I spoke to 2 shops already in regards to tuning and they both said they would have to get back to me. Hopefully this isn't going to turn into a dead end
Old 12-11-13, 12:01 PM
  #44  
Gville350
Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Gville350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 11,568
Likes: 0
Received 430 Likes on 384 Posts
Default

^The tuning portion is (for now) a dead-end; you're better off just using the stock, factory systems to run 6-7 psi as many S/C owners currently do.

The loss of pressure is also correct; but many might not know that turbos actually need little oil pressure or oil delivery. Most turbo setups I've run and installed for others have used a restrictor, to reduce the delivery of oil.
Old 12-11-13, 04:03 PM
  #45  
e46m3lol
Lead Lap
iTrader: (2)
 
e46m3lol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern California
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Gville350
^The tuning portion is (for now) a dead-end; you're better off just using the stock, factory systems to run 6-7 psi as many S/C owners currently do.

The loss of pressure is also correct; but many might not know that turbos actually need little oil pressure or oil delivery. Most turbo setups I've run and installed for others have used a restrictor, to reduce the delivery of oil.
This morning I went to a local shop called racers edge tuning and they recommended I run an AEM standalone fuel management system. Is there any other reputable brands of standalone systems that I should look into running for this twin turbo setup.


Quick Reply: Rear Turbo.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:14 AM.