Performance Forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.
View Poll Results: Do you recommend ?
Yea
51
53.13%
Nay
45
46.88%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

K&N Air Filter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-19-07, 07:45 PM
  #31  
weesped
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (8)
 
weesped's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Honolulu, HI
Posts: 2,026
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

what about the blitz drop in filter any one?
Old 10-19-07, 08:11 PM
  #32  
Lextasy89
Lexus Test Driver
 
Lextasy89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no drop it will cause any noticeable power
Old 10-20-07, 03:20 AM
  #33  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

The ONLY performance benefit a K&N drop in has is at 5000 RPM and above.
Old 10-20-07, 07:26 AM
  #34  
is4fsr
Lead Lap
 
is4fsr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

1. No sound difference
2. Yes. Better throttle response and improved gas mileage ( approx 1 mpg - IS250)
3. ajusa.com sells them cheap.
Old 10-20-07, 12:29 PM
  #35  
al503
Lexus Champion
 
al503's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,680
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dspIS250
al503, the less restrictive something is the louder it is. it was this way on my turbocharged eclipse and every race car in the world. when you put mufflers on a drag car it smothers the high performance engine and less sound can be heard. that's why open headers are louder than mufflers.
I haven't checked this thread for a while so sorry for the delay in responding.

Your conclusion is based on a totally different situation. For starters, you're basing your argument on the exhaust side, not the intake. In addition, you're basing your argument on the existence or absence of major sound absorbing/deadening components. I thought were were discussing the difference in sound with the mere substitution of an aftermarket filter.

With that in mind, an intake with a less restrictive filter will be quieter than the same intake with a more restrictive filter.
Old 10-20-07, 12:36 PM
  #36  
shoguns
Driver School Candidate
 
shoguns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i think the "aggressive" sound some people were talkin about comes from puting a K&N cold air intake in. not just a drop in filter...its been proven than a CAI boosts power. but to get the best out of it you should do an aftermarket header and exhaust. then you would FEEL the power increase. So my vote would be YES for a K&N CAI but NO for just a drop in filter.

heres a link for the CAI...
http://store.knfilters.com/search/pr...Prod=69-8701TP

Last edited by shoguns; 10-20-07 at 12:48 PM.
Old 10-20-07, 01:41 PM
  #37  
iSuxeL
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (21)
 
iSuxeL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 9,302
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Anyone know the size of the OEM intake inlet?
Old 10-24-07, 03:57 PM
  #38  
J'sSoarer
Driver School Candidate
 
J'sSoarer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: IL
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have an sc300 and i put a k&n cone filter instead of the drop in. the car seems a little more responsive and under normal driving i get 20 miles per gallon instead of 18 when it was stock
Old 10-29-07, 07:01 PM
  #39  
Chirodan
Rookie
 
Chirodan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TX
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't really care about power, but if it does give even 1 mpg increase, it will be worth it over time.... even a little bit better gas mileage is why I would buy it... That is the proof I am lookin' for.
Old 04-09-08, 06:49 AM
  #40  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J'sSoarer
i have an sc300 and i put a k&n cone filter instead of the drop in. the car seems a little more responsive and under normal driving i get 20 miles per gallon instead of 18 when it was stock
This could very easily be attributed to ingesting warmer air. At anything less than 50% throttle warm air gets better efficiency. Only at WOT does the cold air thing make a big difference.
Old 06-12-08, 02:08 PM
  #41  
APBT4Me
Pole Position
 
APBT4Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ca
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

throttle response feels better , engine sounds better...as for hp or mpg gains...nothing noticable but it definately didnt hurt
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LexLuder
GX - 1st Gen (2004-2009)
37
02-15-19 06:48 PM
oilnewby
GX - 2nd Gen (2010-2023)
3
01-31-14 04:13 AM
colin415
Performance
6
01-02-14 04:58 PM
hcfarm
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
6
08-01-08 06:29 AM



Quick Reply: K&N Air Filter?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:02 AM.