JOEZ intake Dyno results and videos (Independently Tested)
05-13-06, 10:43 AM
#1
JOEZ intake Dyno results and videos (Independently Tested)
Just did my JOEZ dyno runs today on my car. In summary, the JOEZ intake WORKS! Gained Peak numbers of 5.23hp and 5.26 peak ft/lbs of torque. Also gained power throughout the entire rpm band!
Here are a few videos and below are the baseline dyno results overlaid with the new JOEZ results.
Baseline Dyno
LMS Intake Dyno
JOEZ Intake Dyno
JOEZ Intake DYNO (2) As you can see the dyno begins shortly after the first orange ring lights up around the tachometer which is 75mph. Any speed lower than this the car will downshift on full throttle and throw off the dyno readings.
Here are a few videos and below are the baseline dyno results overlaid with the new JOEZ results.
Baseline Dyno
LMS Intake Dyno
JOEZ Intake Dyno
JOEZ Intake DYNO (2) As you can see the dyno begins shortly after the first orange ring lights up around the tachometer which is 75mph. Any speed lower than this the car will downshift on full throttle and throw off the dyno readings.
05-13-06, 04:10 PM
#6
Pole Position
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: ATX
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks James. Looks nice! I appreciate you posting the dynos. Still debating on whether or not to wait and see what else becomes available, but I think I'll pull the trigger.
Trending Topics
heheh great one!
05-14-06, 12:42 PM
#10
Originally Posted by frylai
LOL Joe should pay you for this 
Can't wait to install mine should be the first one on a RHD!!!
Matt =)
Can't wait to install mine should be the first one on a RHD!!!Matt =)
Actually I only did the test because I wanted to make sure the intake gives the IS350 gains. More of a personal self assurance thing. I had the LMS intake for a few weeks and when I dyno tested it, it was awful. Consistently made less power then the baseline run I did until I added a second fan that blew air almost directly on the intake at which point the car picked up like 3 ft/lbs of torque, but the hp remained the same as baseline. I am sure the primary reason for this is that it's drawing in warm engine bay air. So from my independent tests I've concluded this pipe replacement works the best and I'm going to do a drop in filter when they become available. I'm hoping blitz releases their drop in filter soon as it is a non-oiled type. I'm avoiding any type of oiled filter as I have a feeling the MAF will get messed up.
05-14-06, 04:32 PM
#12
Originally Posted by caymandive
LOL yeah he should. Actually I only did the test because I wanted to make sure the intake gives the IS350 gains. More of a personal self assurance thing. I had the LMS intake for a few weeks and when I dyno tested it, it was awful. Consistently made less power then the baseline run I did until I added a second fan that blew air almost directly on the intake at which point the car picked up like 3 ft/lbs of torque, but the hp remained the same as baseline. I am sure the primary reason for this is that it's drawing in warm engine bay air. So from my independent tests I've concluded this pipe replacement works the best and I'm going to do a drop in filter when they become available. I'm hoping blitz releases their drop in filter soon as it is a non-oiled type. I'm avoiding any type of oiled filter as I have a feeling the MAF will get messed up.
Actually I only did the test because I wanted to make sure the intake gives the IS350 gains. More of a personal self assurance thing. I had the LMS intake for a few weeks and when I dyno tested it, it was awful. Consistently made less power then the baseline run I did until I added a second fan that blew air almost directly on the intake at which point the car picked up like 3 ft/lbs of torque, but the hp remained the same as baseline. I am sure the primary reason for this is that it's drawing in warm engine bay air. So from my independent tests I've concluded this pipe replacement works the best and I'm going to do a drop in filter when they become available. I'm hoping blitz releases their drop in filter soon as it is a non-oiled type. I'm avoiding any type of oiled filter as I have a feeling the MAF will get messed up.
05-14-06, 05:31 PM
#13
Originally Posted by Shinobi-X
Thanks for posting the results. They don't look to be too far off from what I expected.
01-28-08, 09:43 PM
#14
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fl
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
umm... Am I the only person who sees the correction factor on the stock is .96 and the Joe Z pipe is on 1.00.
This means that the stock is making .04% less than on the rating scale as the Joe Z pimp.
Also meaning the the Joe Z numbers are exaggerated and the stock intake actually makes about 4whp more than the Joe Z.
Sorry....
This means that the stock is making .04% less than on the rating scale as the Joe Z pimp.
Also meaning the the Joe Z numbers are exaggerated and the stock intake actually makes about 4whp more than the Joe Z.
Sorry....
