Performance & Maintenance Engine, forced induction, intakes, exhausts, torque converters, transmissions, etc.

what's up with the '92s?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-04-03, 03:03 PM
  #1  
2JZfan
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
2JZfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question what's up with the '92s?

I noticed that the FMAX SC300 turbo kit says its for 93+ cars... i emailed them and asked about the 92s and they said "The 92 CPU and Mass Air Sensor do NOT like boost. The kit will fit fine and if you replace with a 93+ CPU and Mass Air Sensor you should be all right..."

does anybody have any details on what changed ECU/MAF wise on the 93s? I'm in the market for an SC300 right now (everybody needs 4 2JZ powered vehicles, right?)... a turbo will be the first order of business of course, and I'm trying to determine if there's a good reason to avoid a '92 model year vehicle...

any ideas?
Old 08-04-03, 06:43 PM
  #2  
gadgetSC
Racer
 
gadgetSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NY/NV
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

There are a few Turbo 92's around. Some use the LS400 Maf.




gadgetSC-t
Old 08-04-03, 08:55 PM
  #3  
BLK13X
Mortgage Slave
 
BLK13X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NSW
Posts: 4,764
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Default Re: what's up with the '92s?

Originally posted by 2JZfan
...everybody needs 4 2JZ powered vehicles, right?...
Dammit you're a lucky b*stard! Wish I had a garage like that lol
Old 08-04-03, 10:27 PM
  #4  
2JZfan
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
2JZfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by gadgetSC
There are a few Turbo 92's around. Some use the LS400 Maf.
do they use the LS400 maf with the stock '92 SC300 ecu then? what about a '93 SC300 maf on a '92 SC300 car/ecu? any details on what's different between the 3 mafs?

thanks!
Old 08-05-03, 04:38 AM
  #5  
gadgetSC
Racer
 
gadgetSC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NY/NV
Posts: 1,346
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

2jzfan....I really dont think that there is a difference between the 92 & 93 Maf or ECU.
The LS400 maf is just physically larger and allows about 25% more air flow. I used one for a short while during my turbo install
I also mentioned that many use the larger maf while also upgrading there stock injectors with 440 injectors. Hope this helps.



gadgetSC-t
Old 08-05-03, 07:15 AM
  #6  
2JZfan
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
2JZfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Midwest
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks for the info... it seems odd that fmax would limit their market to 93+ if they didn't feel that they had to... the guy told me that they had problems with the 92 maf/ecu, do you think their test car was just flaky or is there really something to this?

anybody have service manuals for 92/93? or access to a parts counter to see if the maf is the same between the two years?

thanks,
Jeff
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
laxdude362
Performance & Maintenance
2
07-17-05 06:15 PM
Derf
Performance & Maintenance
2
10-23-04 07:27 AM
TimmyD
Performance & Maintenance
39
03-21-04 12:29 AM
lexcoupe
Performance & Maintenance
5
11-04-03 09:03 AM
MatT3T4
Performance & Maintenance
15
01-11-02 12:54 PM



Quick Reply: what's up with the '92s?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:04 AM.