Z32TT Vs. 2JZ-GTE SC
#1
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Z32TT Vs. 2JZ-GTE SC
I just completed the Turbo upgrade of my beloved Z32TT.
I was reading the dyno result of my Z32 and decided to compare Z32 Vs. 2JZ-GTE SC.
They are totally different animals.
Z32 is more nimble and runs like a cheetah yet SC runs like a Bull.
SC is about 100 lbs heavier than Z32.
Z32 has VG30DETT, V6 with Bi-turbo set up (5 speed)
SC has 2JZ-GTE, Straight 6 with sequential turbo set up (6 speed)
Both cars are boosting about 18 PSI with stock internals.
In a way, this is an unfair comparison because Z32 is highly modified running aftermarket turbos, etc but boosting low and SC is running is a basic Supra TT with 6 speed and stock turbos boosting high.
Z32TT (Dyno2)
386 WHP @ 6180 RPM
347 TQ @ 4850 RPM
SC300 (Dyno2)
322.8 WHP @ 5737 RPM
340.9 TQ @ 4270 RPM
As the big boy boosting around 4K, SC pulls like there is no tomorrow.
I feel like SC pulls faster and harder than Z32.
However, speedo tells a different story.
I am going much faster in my Z than SC.
I have not had a chance to run them side by side so I do not know which one can out accelerate the other from 60 punch.
I think SC will jump on Z32 and able to keep up with Z32 from 60+ punch.
What do you think?
I was reading the dyno result of my Z32 and decided to compare Z32 Vs. 2JZ-GTE SC.
They are totally different animals.
Z32 is more nimble and runs like a cheetah yet SC runs like a Bull.
SC is about 100 lbs heavier than Z32.
Z32 has VG30DETT, V6 with Bi-turbo set up (5 speed)
SC has 2JZ-GTE, Straight 6 with sequential turbo set up (6 speed)
Both cars are boosting about 18 PSI with stock internals.
In a way, this is an unfair comparison because Z32 is highly modified running aftermarket turbos, etc but boosting low and SC is running is a basic Supra TT with 6 speed and stock turbos boosting high.
Z32TT (Dyno2)
386 WHP @ 6180 RPM
347 TQ @ 4850 RPM
SC300 (Dyno2)
322.8 WHP @ 5737 RPM
340.9 TQ @ 4270 RPM
As the big boy boosting around 4K, SC pulls like there is no tomorrow.
I feel like SC pulls faster and harder than Z32.
However, speedo tells a different story.
I am going much faster in my Z than SC.
I have not had a chance to run them side by side so I do not know which one can out accelerate the other from 60 punch.
I think SC will jump on Z32 and able to keep up with Z32 from 60+ punch.
What do you think?
Last edited by clevercat; 07-31-07 at 09:46 AM.
#2
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How is the SC 1k lbs heavier than the Z? My sc300 weighs 3,400 lbs.. it's not really heavy by any means.
Interesting comparison though.. A Z with a turbo upgrade barely makes more power than a 2JZ with stock turbos.
Allen
Interesting comparison though.. A Z with a turbo upgrade barely makes more power than a 2JZ with stock turbos.
Allen
#3
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought SC is about 3700?
Z is about 3600.
Stock Z32 TT makes about 280 WHP on Dyno.
100 WHP+ a lot...
Then again, I can single turbo my 2JZ-GTE and make a butt load of HP.
Z is about 3600.
Stock Z32 TT makes about 280 WHP on Dyno.
100 WHP+ a lot...
Then again, I can single turbo my 2JZ-GTE and make a butt load of HP.
#4
Lead Lap
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you meant 100 lbs
Well, I weighed my sc300 myself (at a recycling center scale ), and it was 3,400 lbs flat (with the turbo/manifold/fmic installed too). I had about ¼ tank of gas at the time.
Trending Topics
#10
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
GTE has stock TTs boosting MAX @ 18 psi.
I heard some people running higher boost but 18 psi is high # for the stock twins.
My Z32 is capable of boosting up to 25 PSI (500+ WHP).
However, I have limited to to 18 PSI so I can keep my stock engine for a while.
-------------------------------------------------
If you are interested, here is the catch!
SC is has less HP & about same TQ as Z32.
However, SC is 6 speed, HP & TQ comes in earlier than Z32 and supposedly weights less?? (per Blk97SC300).
If you are a motor head, you will find it very intresting.
What is your opinion?
#12
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MO
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's like Cheetah put herself into overdrive catching up with the dinner.
In other hands, SC runs like a bull.
It put you back in to the seat moment you floor it and don't let go until you let it off. The front end raises up and it's really loud.
I feel like I am in Cessna 310 taking off from runway.
#14
Yeah, it's not really a good comparison based on the lb/min of airflow on each setup. Get the same turbo setup/same mods on a TT SC, then you can see the different dynamics of each CAR, not engine. Gearing, weight, will all play into how the comparison plays out, but you can get a simple comparison for the car itself, not really the engines.