SC400 Talk, 1UZFE HP Facts
#16
Lexus Champion
Here is one of the better first gen NA SC400 power gains and this is WITHOUT headers.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...highlight=safc
211rwhp/231rwtq = 270hp/ 296tq
Now, new member jibbby had NA dyno numbers from TMEngineering of 220rwhp and that is 282hp.
Both of these had improved exhaust, inlet and ECU tuning.
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/sho...highlight=safc
211rwhp/231rwtq = 270hp/ 296tq
Now, new member jibbby had NA dyno numbers from TMEngineering of 220rwhp and that is 282hp.
Both of these had improved exhaust, inlet and ECU tuning.
#17
Lexus Champion
Not currently available but IMO the BEST possible NA mod for a street driven engine is the VVA system from http://www.pattakon.com/vvar/HelpRoll.htm
With such a system you can maximize the torque curve from very low to very high RPM. I am in discussion with Manolis regarding an application for the LSx engines. Due to the design of the xUZFE it will require at the very least a change in the cam design to allow the mechanism room between the cam and valves.
With VVA we could see near maximum torque from low rpm road driving to high rpm maximum power production. With optimized everything we are probably looking at a maximum of 350 pound feet of torque or 473Nm for our international friends.
Let's look at what 350tq can give us as we increase the engine operating speed. Remember with VVA you can maintain peak torque to very high rpm.
350tq @ 6000rpm = 400hp = 312rwhp
350tq @ 6500rpm = 433hp = 338rwhp
350tq @ 7000rpm = 467hp = 364rwhp
350tq @ 7500rpm = 500hp = 390rwhp
350tq @ 8000rpm = 533hp = 416rwhp
350tq @ 8500rpm = 566hp = 442rwhp
350tq @ 9000rpm = 600hp = 468rwhp
This is of course in theory but IMO very possible. It would take optimized intake and exhaust porting of the heads, ITB (actually with VVA you do not even need the throttles), and of course and extremely good flowing exhaust system.
I believe the block and crank would have no problem with this. You would want very good pistons and rods. Premium forged pistons and titanium rods would be my choice but good forged rods can handle these RPM.
Even with a completely stock short block the above numbers up to 8000rpm should be very realistic.
Dropping the torque to the GS400 numbers give us the following:
310tq @ 8000rpm = 472hp = 368rwhp
This I believe is probably the best case scenario for stock block non exotic xUZFE engine in stock street driven applications with stock like drivetrains.
With such a system you can maximize the torque curve from very low to very high RPM. I am in discussion with Manolis regarding an application for the LSx engines. Due to the design of the xUZFE it will require at the very least a change in the cam design to allow the mechanism room between the cam and valves.
With VVA we could see near maximum torque from low rpm road driving to high rpm maximum power production. With optimized everything we are probably looking at a maximum of 350 pound feet of torque or 473Nm for our international friends.
Let's look at what 350tq can give us as we increase the engine operating speed. Remember with VVA you can maintain peak torque to very high rpm.
350tq @ 6000rpm = 400hp = 312rwhp
350tq @ 6500rpm = 433hp = 338rwhp
350tq @ 7000rpm = 467hp = 364rwhp
350tq @ 7500rpm = 500hp = 390rwhp
350tq @ 8000rpm = 533hp = 416rwhp
350tq @ 8500rpm = 566hp = 442rwhp
350tq @ 9000rpm = 600hp = 468rwhp
This is of course in theory but IMO very possible. It would take optimized intake and exhaust porting of the heads, ITB (actually with VVA you do not even need the throttles), and of course and extremely good flowing exhaust system.
I believe the block and crank would have no problem with this. You would want very good pistons and rods. Premium forged pistons and titanium rods would be my choice but good forged rods can handle these RPM.
Even with a completely stock short block the above numbers up to 8000rpm should be very realistic.
Dropping the torque to the GS400 numbers give us the following:
310tq @ 8000rpm = 472hp = 368rwhp
This I believe is probably the best case scenario for stock block non exotic xUZFE engine in stock street driven applications with stock like drivetrains.
#18
John great info. I just posted in another thread that I felt 8000RPM's with engine changes could produce 500 + RWHP. The link is very interesting, I love links like that. I think that would work. Lets not foget a titanium and lightened Valve train that would live above 7500 RPM. Springs Valve etc.
I want to know what happens and if this develops I want to know. I have another engine. If you need actual parts specs or measurements let me know.
I want to know what happens and if this develops I want to know. I have another engine. If you need actual parts specs or measurements let me know.
#19
Do all of these year engines have the same internals? Like does the 98+ in the SC400 (or any 1uz with VVT-I have weaker rods? Any other differences besides HP? yes i know thread says hp facts, but why not more...
#20
Lexus Champion
Originally Posted by xirforever
Do all of these year engines have the same internals? Like does the 98+ in the SC400 (or any 1uz with VVT-I have weaker rods? Any other differences besides HP? yes i know thread says hp facts, but why not more...
1998-2000 all, compression increased to 10.5-1, vvti cam timing with higher lift, different heads with different intake manifolds with straighter ports, weaker lighter rods, different MAF sensor type, variable runner lenght intake manifold with front mounted throttle body, no EGR plumbing (done with vvti) coil on plug ignition, throttle by wire.
#21
once again jbrady to the rescue! haha thanks for the great info as usual, one last question, on the 10.4:1 1uz's, is the short block the same as the 10:1 's? Like they didnt change the wall thickness at all between these two "tweeked" motors did they?
#23
Racer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive given this some thought... I have doubts that modding a lexus V8 to the point where it starts putting down some serious power might compromise the nice feel that it has. Like, it just wouldnt feel smooth and lexus-like any longer. Thats more important to me, but probably not to you.
#25
Racer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jbrady
I have stated in the past that I believe that Lexus over rated the 1990-1994 LS400 and the 1992-1995 SC400. The stock rating of 250hp/260tq is IMO not accurate. The 1995-1997 LS400 and the 1996-1997 SC400 are rated 260hp/270tq which IMO is accurate. The 1998-2000 GS400 rating of 300hp/310tq and the 1998-2000 LS400 and SC400 at 290hp/300tq IMO is accurate.
The first gen SC400 and the GS400 probably have the most dyno info for comparison. The typical GS400 makes 235rwhp/245rwtq. Doing the math (300-235=65, 65/300=0.216) gives us a reasonable 22% (21.666) drivetrain loss.
So, if the first gen made 250hp it should make 195rwhp. We all know it doesn't. 175rwhp is more like it. Working backwards gives us 224hp. I use 230hp as my rule of thumb.
The 96-97 models are rated 260hp so subtracting 22% = 203rwhp. I believe the 96-97 models typically dyno right around 200rwhp. This is both accurate and reasonable when you consider the performance difference between the 1990-1994 LS400s and the 1995-1997 LS400s as well as the difference between the 1992-1995 SC400s and the 1996-1997s. There is obviously WAY MORE than 10hp between these models.
The first gen SC400 and the GS400 probably have the most dyno info for comparison. The typical GS400 makes 235rwhp/245rwtq. Doing the math (300-235=65, 65/300=0.216) gives us a reasonable 22% (21.666) drivetrain loss.
So, if the first gen made 250hp it should make 195rwhp. We all know it doesn't. 175rwhp is more like it. Working backwards gives us 224hp. I use 230hp as my rule of thumb.
The 96-97 models are rated 260hp so subtracting 22% = 203rwhp. I believe the 96-97 models typically dyno right around 200rwhp. This is both accurate and reasonable when you consider the performance difference between the 1990-1994 LS400s and the 1995-1997 LS400s as well as the difference between the 1992-1995 SC400s and the 1996-1997s. There is obviously WAY MORE than 10hp between these models.
#26
Just for reference purposes I’d dyno'd my sc400 today at DSR in San Jose, the results where 202.0 HP and 220.7 TQ[U]. My SC has 195k miles I just gave it tune-up and switched the fully-synthetic 10w-30w oil 3 weeks ago. Only performance mod I have is BFI right now because I’ve spent allot of money on TT AGX's/TT eibach/ Yokohama tires/Strut bar. MY future plans are Full exhaust, SAFC, and daizen sways.
#27
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
Nice !! What kind of dyno was that?
I forgot about this quality thread! Glad to see it back.
My latest mods/dyno #'s
92 SC400
Cut out intake box with K&N drop in
Walbro 255lph pump
SAFCII + dyno tuning
190 whp on dynodynamics
All of the above plus:
Nitrous Express wet kit, 150 hp jets
Zex bottle warmer, NX gauge, NX tps switch, B&M fuel pressure gauge
297 whp
I forgot about this quality thread! Glad to see it back.
My latest mods/dyno #'s
92 SC400
Cut out intake box with K&N drop in
Walbro 255lph pump
SAFCII + dyno tuning
190 whp on dynodynamics
All of the above plus:
Nitrous Express wet kit, 150 hp jets
Zex bottle warmer, NX gauge, NX tps switch, B&M fuel pressure gauge
297 whp
#30
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JG post your dyno info too
1992 SC400, 180,000 kilometers
K&N drop in filter, cut open front of stock intake
NGK BKR7E spark plugs
Walbro GSS341
94 Octane
171.6 rwhp on a dyno dynamics a/f 10.5:1
With Nitrous Express Wet kit, 150HP shot
Botle pressure just 600psi but was filled the day before.
267.6 rwhp a/f 10.0:1 (As rich as it will read!)
As you can see I am very rich. I am installing a bottle warmer and SAFCII and I am going back to the dyno for tuning in the near future.
1992 SC400, 180,000 kilometers
K&N drop in filter, cut open front of stock intake
NGK BKR7E spark plugs
Walbro GSS341
94 Octane
171.6 rwhp on a dyno dynamics a/f 10.5:1
With Nitrous Express Wet kit, 150HP shot
Botle pressure just 600psi but was filled the day before.
267.6 rwhp a/f 10.0:1 (As rich as it will read!)
As you can see I am very rich. I am installing a bottle warmer and SAFCII and I am going back to the dyno for tuning in the near future.