May '14 - Please NUMBER and post your pics of the month here - Page 2 - Club Lexus Forums

Log In 

May '14 - Please NUMBER and post your pics of the month here

Closed Thread
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-14, 10:33 AM   #16
RA40
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
RA40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 17,135
Default

My first guess would be the 105-DC or 135-DC. I had used one long ago but cannot recall the exact look of the lens since it was some 20+ years ago.
RA40 is offline  
Old 05-19-14, 06:47 PM   #17
Kaydee
Hacked CL to become a Mod
 
Kaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver >> Hong Kong
Posts: 6,606
Default

Not quite, this is a strictly manual focus lens. Nikon's widest aperture to be exact.

Drum roll.....It's the Nikkor 50 1.2.

Chikoo ,not really sure where you are seeing the shake or blur here as I took these under 'ideal' shutter speed.

That being said, because I shot this lens at its widest setting, being 1.2, there may have been some slight focus miss. The depth of field is so thin that you can see in the selfie shot the Nikon logo is in focus but the D600 emblem is just creamy. Add to that, most lenses are not at their best wide open.

That's the beauty, and I guess the pitfall, of this particular lens. It's not sharper than my 85 or the standard zoom; heck ,the aberration and spherochtomatism is not well corrected at all.

But this lens is not about being the sharpest, although it's not a bad performer by any means.It's about how it makes the bokeh looks.

Last edited by Kaydee; 05-20-14 at 05:12 AM.
Kaydee is offline  
Old 05-19-14, 07:32 PM   #18
RA40
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
RA40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 17,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaydee View Post
Ten points to anyone who can guess with which lens I took these shots. Hint: It's a Nikkor lens.
Wnat to seem ore of this lens...Can you do a cityscape or landscape with plenty of specular highlights?
RA40 is offline  
Old 05-20-14, 01:40 AM   #19
don
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 4,074
Default

Saw these planes doing rounds near a small airport/runway so I decided to try to get some shots. Difficult shooting at 5 fps and 7 image buffer.


1.


2.
don is offline  
Old 05-20-14, 05:15 AM   #20
Kaydee
Hacked CL to become a Mod
 
Kaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver >> Hong Kong
Posts: 6,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RA40 View Post
Wnat to seem ore of this lens...Can you do a cityscape or landscape with plenty of specular highlights?
I iwll try but my first impressions so far is that the corners of this lens wide open is quite bad, which leads me to believe that there might be some field curvature issues. Vignetting is super bad too.
Kaydee is offline  
Old 05-20-14, 09:05 AM   #21
1111GS
Moderator
 
1111GS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: _____
Posts: 1,216
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaydee View Post
Not quite, this is a strictly manual focus lens. Nikon's widest aperture to be exact.

Drum roll.....It's the Nikkor 50 1.2.

Chikoo ,not really sure where you are seeing the shake or blur here as I took these under 'ideal' shutter speed.

That being said, because I shot this lens at its widest setting, being 1.2, there may have been some slight focus miss. The depth of field is so thin that you can see in the selfie shot the Nikon logo is in focus but the D600 emblem is just creamy. Add to that, most lenses are not at their best wide open.

That's the beauty, and I guess the pitfall, of this particular lens. It's not sharper than my 85 or the standard zoom; heck ,the aberration and spherochtomatism is not well corrected at all.

But this lens is not about being the sharpest, although it's not a bad performer by any means.It's about how it makes the bokeh looks.
You can certainly use this for low light recording. I'm using the 50 1.8 for low light recording and sometimes I want to be able to go a little lower so I won't have to crank up the ISO.
I think you're right about the lens not being best at its widest. From my experience, I notice the 50 does better at 2ish than 1.8.
1111GS is offline  
Old 05-20-14, 03:10 PM   #22
RA40
Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
 
RA40's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: California
Posts: 17,135
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaydee View Post
I iwll try but my first impressions so far is that the corners of this lens wide open is quite bad, which leads me to believe that there might be some field curvature issues. Vignetting is super bad too.
Have limited recourse for softness though when it comes to other areas, the characteristics are easily handled. I don't mind the softness these days at the corners, I tend to soften them and add vignetting anyhow. How the lens does with highlights and those areas before and after the focus point become interesting. Lightroom is pretty amazing for lens distortions and light falloff.

A lunch grab with the G15:
Attached Thumbnails
May '14 - Please NUMBER and post your pics of the month here-sushi-glry-1733-3.jpg  
RA40 is offline  
Old 05-21-14, 08:13 AM   #23
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaydee View Post

Chikoo ,not really sure where you are seeing the shake or blur here as I took these under 'ideal' shutter speed.
I could have sworn this looks like motion blur





chikoo is offline  
Old 05-21-14, 09:30 AM   #24
neurocity
Scotchy, Scotch, Scotch
iTrader: (17)
 
neurocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,591
Default

NW Wisconsin last weekend. Haven t posted in forever.

Hummingbird

1.


2.


3.
neurocity is offline  
Old 05-21-14, 09:36 AM   #25
neurocity
Scotchy, Scotch, Scotch
iTrader: (17)
 
neurocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 8,591
Default

Had to do some cropping to bring these two eagles in. I love the one where he/she flew into the setting sun beam lighting up the wings. I wish i had more than a 180mm at the time.

1.


2.


Loon

3.
neurocity is offline  
Old 05-21-14, 09:51 AM   #26
Kaydee
Hacked CL to become a Mod
 
Kaydee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Vancouver >> Hong Kong
Posts: 6,606
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chikoo View Post
I could have sworn this looks like motion blur

Well for one I didn't focus on those things, so I wanna take a guess that those were probably just the product of the shallow depth of field. You can see sort of the same effect on the Apple logo in the second pic.

But considering that what I tried to focus on were sharp more or less, unless the logo moved themselves, I'd say it was just the depth of field. I dunno...someone else?
Kaydee is offline  
Old 05-21-14, 12:59 PM   #27
Cuttooth
Lead Lap
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: hawaii
Posts: 654
Default

The Battleship Missouri

Warship by Cuttooth01, on Flickr
Cuttooth is offline  
Old 05-21-14, 08:31 PM   #28
blisiono
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (17)
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,124
Default

Been a real long while since I've posted anything here. A shot from this past weekend from my 10D.

Untitled by blisiono, on Flickr
blisiono is offline  
Old 05-22-14, 07:16 PM   #29
isam250
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (7)
 
isam250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: ca
Posts: 2,479
Default





isam250 is offline  
Old 05-23-14, 07:03 AM   #30
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,607
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaydee View Post
Well for one I didn't focus on those things, so I wanna take a guess that those were probably just the product of the shallow depth of field. You can see sort of the same effect on the Apple logo in the second pic.

But considering that what I tried to focus on were sharp more or less, unless the logo moved themselves, I'd say it was just the depth of field. I dunno...someone else?
I have seen this happen before, and my take on it is that it is motion blur, but the stabilization mechanism takes care of the objects in focus, and the ones out of focus not so much. Just a hunch.
chikoo is offline  
 
 
Closed Thread

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vaistech SLI installation instructions w/ pics for 04-07 RX lexuslover RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009) 138 04-04-16 09:41 AM
2016 Ford Focus RS Hoovey2411 Car Chat 21 10-13-15 10:49 AM
2015 Focus ST Cranked to 275 HP by OEM-Backed Upgrade Kit bagwell Car Chat 5 08-19-15 11:55 PM
2014 VW GTI vs 2014 Ford Focus ST? Level99Jew Car Chat 31 08-08-14 01:09 PM
CA NEW Canon 18-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS STM PureDrifter General Classifieds 3 08-05-14 04:28 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:16 PM.


Copyright © 2000-2016 Internet Brands, Inc. All Rights Reserved