Synthetic vs. Synthetic Blend...
#31
Pole Position
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: California
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by PitBull
I It's obvious that a synthetic oil that is the correct weight and rated higher then the minimum dino oil that is recommended in your owner manual will do a better job of protecting your investment as long as it is changed at the right interval.
I It's obvious that a synthetic oil that is the correct weight and rated higher then the minimum dino oil that is recommended in your owner manual will do a better job of protecting your investment as long as it is changed at the right interval.
For 25 years the American synthetic oil companies have had the opportunity to prove synthetics
substantially reduce engine wear and boost fuel economy yet have failed to do so in all that time.
For 25 years the Asian car company engineers have had the opportunity to evaluate synthetic oils and study oil analysis results and yet to this very day only a very few recommend or use synthetics as the factory fill, even in the $60,000 Lexus's and Infiniti's.
Yes, synthetic is the factory fill in some high performance specialty American and European cars, but none of these vehicles have a reputation for outstanding reliability and durability like nearly all the Asian cars do, so I see no point in mentioning what lubricants are used as the factory fill in Corvettes, Dodge Vipers, Porches, Mercedes's and BMW's.
Now it's true some of the old 60's and 70's Volvo's, Mercedes and even American cars DID have legendary reputations for durability, but those reputations were established when owners were using conventional dino oils.
#32
Pole Position
So I guess Amsoil, Redline, Fleetguard , etc are all wrong???? Hmmmm… Nevermind the millions and millions on miles on Class 8 trucks that are using the synthetic and going longer? Hmmmm The data is out there if you look. Just because “Asian” cars do not do it, does not mean it does not work.
So far my oil tests show better results them all the dino oil stest I have seen, plus some synthetic oils. That is sooooooo weird.
You are correct but last time I looked into Asian parts of the world, pollution is not on the top of the list, nor is the environment, pay, labor etc. So why change to an expensive oil when most people in that part of the world don’t even have a car, never mind the oil? Then in the USA, most people do not want to spend the extra $$$ for the better oil. So you are going to have some manufacture tell "me" to use some $4.00 qt oil when most users will go to Wal-Mart? The wil see the $4 oil and the $1.4 oil and you know what most will select.
I would not also say Asin cars have outstanding reliability and durability. Based only on what info? All cars have good and bad things.
Example look at Lexus, there cars are always #1 in there class, but look at there “so-called” manual. They are #1 since the car needs to be brought in for every “nickel and dime” thing in the book! It is unreal. They want the car in there every day from rotating tires, lubing rubber on doors, cleaning windows, checking this and that. It should damn well be #1 for the money you spend if you go by the book.
Then the person that just spent over XXXX dollars, gets a survey and loves the car! Well I should hope so since you just spent 10% of the car’s value and it better not break. Can you say that is slightly bias call here…. Another example, people think the airlines are so reliable. They are maintenance hogs. Never mind everything being replaced at xxx hours no matter what.
Again, show me some dino oil test and let the numbers talk. So far dino was outdated 15 years ago. Spend $30K on a high tech car and put dino oil in it. That is like having a million dollar home and then going cheep on the floors.
So far my oil tests show better results them all the dino oil stest I have seen, plus some synthetic oils. That is sooooooo weird.
You are correct but last time I looked into Asian parts of the world, pollution is not on the top of the list, nor is the environment, pay, labor etc. So why change to an expensive oil when most people in that part of the world don’t even have a car, never mind the oil? Then in the USA, most people do not want to spend the extra $$$ for the better oil. So you are going to have some manufacture tell "me" to use some $4.00 qt oil when most users will go to Wal-Mart? The wil see the $4 oil and the $1.4 oil and you know what most will select.
I would not also say Asin cars have outstanding reliability and durability. Based only on what info? All cars have good and bad things.
Example look at Lexus, there cars are always #1 in there class, but look at there “so-called” manual. They are #1 since the car needs to be brought in for every “nickel and dime” thing in the book! It is unreal. They want the car in there every day from rotating tires, lubing rubber on doors, cleaning windows, checking this and that. It should damn well be #1 for the money you spend if you go by the book.
Then the person that just spent over XXXX dollars, gets a survey and loves the car! Well I should hope so since you just spent 10% of the car’s value and it better not break. Can you say that is slightly bias call here…. Another example, people think the airlines are so reliable. They are maintenance hogs. Never mind everything being replaced at xxx hours no matter what.
Again, show me some dino oil test and let the numbers talk. So far dino was outdated 15 years ago. Spend $30K on a high tech car and put dino oil in it. That is like having a million dollar home and then going cheep on the floors.
Last edited by mburnickas; 10-15-04 at 06:18 PM.
#33
Pole Position
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by saber
Synthetic provides an "Obviously better job" of protecting the engine? I have a completely different take on that:
For 25 years the American synthetic oil companies have had the opportunity to prove synthetics
substantially reduce engine wear and boost fuel economy yet have failed to do so in all that time.
For 25 years the Asian car company engineers have had the opportunity to evaluate synthetic oils and study oil analysis results and yet to this very day only a very few recommend or use synthetics as the factory fill, even in the $60,000 Lexus's and Infiniti's.
Yes, synthetic is the factory fill in some high performance specialty American and European cars, but none of these vehicles have a reputation for outstanding reliability and durability like nearly all the Asian cars do, so I see no point in mentioning what lubricants are used as the factory fill in Corvettes, Dodge Vipers, Porches, Mercedes's and BMW's.
Now it's true some of the old 60's and 70's Volvo's, Mercedes and even American cars DID have legendary reputations for durability, but those reputations were established when owners were using conventional dino oils.
Synthetic provides an "Obviously better job" of protecting the engine? I have a completely different take on that:
For 25 years the American synthetic oil companies have had the opportunity to prove synthetics
substantially reduce engine wear and boost fuel economy yet have failed to do so in all that time.
For 25 years the Asian car company engineers have had the opportunity to evaluate synthetic oils and study oil analysis results and yet to this very day only a very few recommend or use synthetics as the factory fill, even in the $60,000 Lexus's and Infiniti's.
Yes, synthetic is the factory fill in some high performance specialty American and European cars, but none of these vehicles have a reputation for outstanding reliability and durability like nearly all the Asian cars do, so I see no point in mentioning what lubricants are used as the factory fill in Corvettes, Dodge Vipers, Porches, Mercedes's and BMW's.
Now it's true some of the old 60's and 70's Volvo's, Mercedes and even American cars DID have legendary reputations for durability, but those reputations were established when owners were using conventional dino oils.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post