LS - 3rd Gen (2001-2006) Discussion topics related to the flagship Lexus LS430

Whats your opinion on newer year with less option?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-12, 05:58 PM
  #1  
LS430FL
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
LS430FL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 1,078
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
Default Whats your opinion on newer year with less option?

Hi, I have been visiting the forum for a while, but this is my first post. I have had a 2001 LS430 for over 4 years now, and simply love it. Literally have not had any problems at all *knock on wood* and the car now has 170,000 miles on it. The car is an ultra luxury edition. Recently, I have seen several VERY low mileage cars in the 2004,2005, and 2006 years. I'm talking about cars with 20K and 30K miles on them. However, none of them seem to have even simple navigation as an option. What is your opinion as far as me keeping my car or selling and getting a low mileage car but with a much smaller option list. Are these cars seriously affected value and desirability wise if they don't have navigation? Do you guys recommend a non navigation car? Any input at all would be greatly appreciated. I am torn... Thanks!! (did a search but couldn't find anything on the topic)
Old 10-23-12, 06:05 PM
  #2  
Kira X
美少女戦士セーラームーン

iTrader: (24)
 
Kira X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: 東京都
Posts: 11,186
Received 408 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

The models without navigation would have less stuff to wrong with them, but I do see them go for a lot less than a model with navigation.

Personally I would buy an 04-06 without the navigation. I never liked how everything is controlled by the navigation screen. If it were to go out, you wouldn't be able to access your A/C controls and all of that other stuff. There was someone on here that had an Ultra Luxury LS430, but for some reason it didn't have the navigation screen.
Old 10-23-12, 07:20 PM
  #3  
zindallas
Driver School Candidate
 
zindallas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd say you should get whatever option set you prefer. The nav option came as part of a relatively expensive option set so that explains the cost difference in the cars you are considering. If you plan to own this car for some time and put miles on it anywhere near like you did with your current car at that point the value between a nav and non-nav version would be negligible.

My $.02.

Z
Old 10-23-12, 07:37 PM
  #4  
Jabberwock
Moderator
 
Jabberwock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,901
Received 203 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Lexus 2006 navigation system wasn't state of the art 6 years ago when the last LS430 produced was new. The old LS430 Nav uses a laughably poor resolution graphics system and obsolete dvd based maps that have to be repurchased every year to stay current. Being hardware based (dvd) its naturally prone to failure over time.

How anyone can find the LSA430's obsolete clunky Nav system and interface desirable in a used car has always been a mystery to me. At some point in the not too distant future more and more folks will start to see the obsolete Nav systems in these cars as reasons to avoid the Nav equipped cars.
Old 10-23-12, 08:40 PM
  #5  
C8V6C
Pole Position
 
C8V6C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NV
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

The UL without nav was a Canadian car i believe...

Id consider one without nav if you don't want or need all the goodies
Old 10-23-12, 08:55 PM
  #6  
Stu
Racer
 
Stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,265
Received 58 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jabberwock
Lexus 2006 navigation system wasn't state of the art 6 years ago when the last LS430 produced was new. The old LS430 Nav uses a laughably poor resolution graphics system and obsolete dvd based maps that have to be repurchased every year to stay current. Being hardware based (dvd) its naturally prone to failure over time.

How anyone can find the LSA430's obsolete clunky Nav system and interface desirable in a used car has always been a mystery to me. At some point in the not too distant future more and more folks will start to see the obsolete Nav systems in these cars as reasons to avoid the Nav equipped cars.
I actually refused to even look at an LS430 with Navigation ( or air suspention to avoid expensive failures ) for EXACTLY the reasons Jabberwock stated, plus I didn't want to be tied to Lexus and their map upgrades.

I use my Garmin navigation unit every day ( I am in sales ) - it works great and if it ever breaks, a new one with updated maps it $150 ! Can't beat that !
Old 10-24-12, 05:29 AM
  #7  
Lac
Driver
iTrader: (3)
 
Lac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I do not like my '04 Navi (outdated) but love Mark Levinson auto system.
Old 10-24-12, 10:27 AM
  #8  
jayclapp
Lexus Champion
 
jayclapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: AZ
Posts: 2,489
Received 104 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

I really like the system controls in the nav system. Easy to use without a lot of attention required. I will just refuse to purchase a newer car that has a "joystick". Total nonsense and a safety distraction.
Old 10-24-12, 11:02 AM
  #9  
BradTank
Racer
 
BradTank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,645
Received 170 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Navigation systems in cars are now highly overrated, I almost exclusively use my smartphone if I need directions.

They also put so many restrictions and when you can use them (ex. my wife can't punch in an address unless I'm stopped) and need expensive updates (a yearly update DVD is about the same cost as a whole new smartphone) They're also incredibly clunky. It was a "gee whiz" feature a decade ago, but now it should be a $99 option on all new cars, considering you can go to WalMart and buy a portable Garmin GPS for under a hundred bucks that's FAR better than what's in our cars.

I certainly wouldn't buy a car based on the navigation system, and in many ways would prefer it without because I hate using so many controls through a touch screen.
Old 10-24-12, 12:40 PM
  #10  
Jabberwock
Moderator
 
Jabberwock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,901
Received 203 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jayclapp
I really like the system controls in the nav system. Easy to use without a lot of attention required. I will just refuse to purchase a newer car that has a "joystick". Total nonsense and a safety distraction.
100% agree - very few more crappy ideas that adding a joystick and a complex screen interface to a car. We actually were interested in the 2013 GS until we took it for a long test ride and saw just how bad the Lexus joyknob interface was to deal with. Total crap. This era of joysticks in cars in gonna be seen as the low point of car ergonomics someday.


Taking a PC computer interface that was developed for your desk and mouse pad at home and putting it into an environment where the operator is simultaneously supposed to use a joystick and screen and a completely different set of controls (steering wheel, brakes, windshield) to maintain second by second control of 4k lbs of metal moving down the road at 60mph in bumper to bumper expressway traffic is just asking for tragedy. Apparently the car designers are more concerned about being trendy than being safe - maybe they have need to be educated on what "loss of situational awareness" means in a high speed, high risk environment.

Last edited by Jabberwock; 10-24-12 at 08:15 PM.
Old 10-24-12, 01:48 PM
  #11  
Stu
Racer
 
Stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 1,265
Received 58 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BradTank
.... It was a "gee whiz" feature a decade ago, but now it should be a $99 option on all new cars, considering you can go to WalMart and buy a portable Garmin GPS for under a hundred bucks that's FAR better than what's in our cars. I certainly wouldn't buy a car based on the navigation system, and in many ways would prefer it without because I hate using so many controls through a touch screen.
all of this is 100% true.
Old 10-24-12, 04:08 PM
  #12  
LS430FL
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
LS430FL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 1,078
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Hey guys, thanks very much for all of your replies. Jabberwock your point really made me realize that the navigation is not essential. I think that the main concern i had now that I think about it is the aesthetic look for the dash, but I think I will be able to live with a non NAV dash. Does anybody know if you are still able to add an iPod hookup even if you don't have a NAV screen? Also, how do the parking sensors work? is it just the sound? Thanks again everyone!
Old 10-24-12, 05:16 PM
  #13  
warminwisc
Lexus Champion
 
warminwisc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: wi
Posts: 2,876
Received 31 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Nav I can get from Garmin, my base stereo is good, I have Bluetooth in my 012 Touareg which is spectacular. How is the clarity of the Bluetooth phone system in the units with NAV. 04-06?
Old 10-24-12, 08:16 PM
  #14  
Jabberwock
Moderator
 
Jabberwock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,901
Received 203 Likes on 166 Posts
Default

Several options avail to add ipod adapter to both Nav and non Nav equiped LS430s. I installed a Soundgate TOYPD2 Ipod adapter. Works great.
Old 10-25-12, 06:10 PM
  #15  
LS430FL
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
LS430FL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 1,078
Received 91 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Perfect I'm going to look into getting one of those. Do you think that these LS430s from 04-06 with 20-30K mile range are really worth 28K+ with no NAV? There are several around 28K and up! Thanks again


Quick Reply: Whats your opinion on newer year with less option?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 AM.