Lexus Audio, Video, Security & Electronics
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which Sounds Best To You?
AM Radio
0
0%
CD Changer
18
69.23%
FM Radio
0
0%
iPod Integration
7
26.92%
XM/Sirius Satellite Radio
1
3.85%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Best Sound Source?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-07, 09:31 AM
  #1  
Kroozin
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
Kroozin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Best Sound Source?

Just curious how others would rate their music sources. I would rank mine in the following order:

1. Ipod integration
2. CD
3. FM
4. XM Satellite
5. Casette
6. AM


I was quite surprised that after I installed the iPod integration this weekend it really woke up my car's sound system. It appears to be much clearer than all my other music sources - even clearer than my CD player! I've recorded all the music on my iPod in 256kb or 192kb bit rates and the CD obviously plays at a higher bit rate so I have no idea why it doesn't sound the best(?). I'll need to compare the music recorded on my iPod with the same music CD to be sure I'm comparing apples-to-apples.

The biggest surprise to me is the poor quality of XM. Since XM is a digital signal (not sure of the bitrate(?)) I thought I'd get a much better sound quality but even a strong FM radio station sounds better. Maybe the circuitry and amplifiers in the XM unit are poor quality or perhaps XM is trying to transmit too many channels on too little bandwidth which results in reduced sound quality per channel. My guess is that they allocate a minimal datarate that varies per channel so they can provide all those channels. Have you listened to local traffic on XM? Those stations must be using their lowest bitrate possible because they sound terrible.

Just curious what others think is their best sound source?...
Old 05-30-07, 12:09 PM
  #2  
Robert_J
Lead Lap
 
Robert_J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MS
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Your Ipod and the AAC format may have some built in EQ to compensate for what is lost during compression. I don't have an Ipod and never listened to one.

Like you said, CD's should sound better since they have a 44.1khz sampling rate. You need to compare the same songs from quality recordings before making a final judgement. Find some acoustic guitar, female voices and some clean cymbals (the metal parts on drums). Quality recordings should show you that compressed music should be outlawed. The world is buying lesser quality digital music while a scarce few of us are trying to upgrade to SACD and DVD-Audio.

And XM has been compared to 92kbps MP3. I can hear the compression on my ES-350's sound system but it is still better than FM in both quality and variety.

-Robert
Old 05-30-07, 01:20 PM
  #3  
MJHSC400
Lexus Test Driver
 
MJHSC400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: sc
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The one time my cd changer worked, it was the best my stock Pioneer system (92 SC4) ever sounded with the stock amp--

I retained the OE head unit with my own amps and patched in mp3 signal through the changer input signals and the sound is great--

I'm sure a cd sounds a bit better, but when the mp3's are 320k it's hard to tell any difference at all--

CD would of course have the actual highest quality due to the sampling rate and so on-- but I can't stand having 250 cd's to jack with--
Old 05-30-07, 03:52 PM
  #4  
Robert_J
Lead Lap
 
Robert_J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MS
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MJHSC400
but I can't stand having 250 cd's to jack with--
Try about 800 CD's. I just finished a 3 month project ripping them to WMA, 320kbps. This way my wife can pick out her "greatest hits" and put them on 6 discs. I was really surprised to find out the ES-350 supports WMA and MP3.

I prefer CD but the car isn't for critical listening.

-Robert
Old 05-30-07, 06:10 PM
  #5  
engin_ear
Everything in Moderation
iTrader: (1)
 
engin_ear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East of Philly
Posts: 2,747
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_J
Your Ipod and the AAC format may have some built in EQ to compensate for what is lost during compression. I don't have an Ipod and never listened to one.

Like you said, CD's should sound better since they have a 44.1khz sampling rate. You need to compare the same songs from quality recordings before making a final judgement. Find some acoustic guitar, female voices and some clean cymbals (the metal parts on drums). Quality recordings should show you that compressed music should be outlawed. The world is buying lesser quality digital music while a scarce few of us are trying to upgrade to SACD and DVD-Audio.

And XM has been compared to 92kbps MP3. I can hear the compression on my ES-350's sound system but it is still better than FM in both quality and variety.

-Robert
iPod probably does not have any additional EQ.
CD's should definitely sound best, unless you have an FM-modulated aftermarket CD changer. A stock one is not, it is directly wired.

An MP3 at 256kbps and above will be virtually indistinguishable from CD for most listeners. An AAC format file at 192 and above will also be indistinguishable. 128bps does not cut it with either one.

XM is not even as good as 92kbps MP3.
A clean FM station can sound better than compressed digital satellite, mainly in the areas of high frequency and channel separation. Problem is that you get a clean, strong FM station about 1% of the time - literally. (And let's not mention the commercials and repetition...)
iPod is clearly better-sounding than XM or Sirius. The satellite signal suffers from heavy compression artifacts, ESPECIALLY loss of stereo separation - due to the cramming of too many channels into not enough bandwidth. The average channel bandwidth is about 30-some kbps these days.

Jerry
Old 05-31-07, 12:59 AM
  #6  
kratos
Pole Position
 
kratos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: BC
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I prefer DVD-Audio.
Old 05-31-07, 07:31 PM
  #7  
engin_ear
Everything in Moderation
iTrader: (1)
 
engin_ear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East of Philly
Posts: 2,747
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kratos
I prefer DVD-Audio.
You DVD-Audio Snob.
Old 06-16-07, 03:34 PM
  #8  
darksparkz
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
darksparkz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1) DVD
2) CD
3) Ipod, or any other AUX input for music
4) HD Radio
5) XM
6) Casette
7) FM
8) AM
Old 06-16-07, 04:29 PM
  #9  
Lexmex
Super Moderator
 
Lexmex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Miami, Florida
Posts: 17,238
Received 159 Likes on 136 Posts
Default

CD.

Now with the XM, it works better with the cassette adapter than the FM modulator.
Old 06-16-07, 05:57 PM
  #10  
ccotenj
Driver School Candidate
 
ccotenj's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by engin_ear
An MP3 at 256kbps and above will be virtually indistinguishable from CD for most listeners. An AAC format file at 192 and above will also be indistinguishable. 128bps does not cut it with either one.
x2... i do everything at 192vbr aac... heck, i can't abx 160vbr, but my wife can, so i do 192 to make her happy... the only thing i'd change is "most listeners" to "virtually all listeners"... repeated blind testing has shown it to be true, regardless of what people "think" they can hear (and i used to be one of those who "knew" i could tell the difference)...
Old 06-16-07, 08:18 PM
  #11  
strongsail
Lexus Test Driver
 
strongsail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Robert_J

I prefer CD but the car isn't for critical listening.

-Robert
Exactly. I've listened to some very high-end car systems, and they sound terrific sitting still. But road noise is always enough to degrade the sound, so good enough is good enough. I've been an audio nut for 40 years, and when I want the best sound I just stay home
Old 06-20-07, 11:25 AM
  #12  
oslo
Driver School Candidate
 
oslo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I can't tell any difference in sound between most compressed music and CDs in my car. I have an aftermarket sony stereo and the convenience of a front panel line-in for my ipod beats out CDs any day.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Luke27617
GX - 2nd Gen (2010-2023)
13
04-26-11 10:50 PM
FastEC
RX - 1st Gen (1999-2003)
5
03-29-10 01:17 PM
Orbit
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
3
02-01-10 08:39 PM
Jace7
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
16
01-04-07 02:37 PM
Ex-Lexic
LS - 4th Gen (2007-2017)
24
12-07-06 07:33 PM



Quick Reply: Best Sound Source?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM.