IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

thoughts on mpg w is250 vs waiting 4 turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-13-14, 05:19 PM
  #1  
ls430lover
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
ls430lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default thoughts on mpg w is250 vs waiting 4 turbo

hi all i was thinking of getting the is but i struggle with the 22mpg or 23 combined i am thinking that if i am spending 45k that for the next 6 years i want a car that averages almost 30 and runs on regular unleaded. anyone else feel the same way?
Old 11-13-14, 05:48 PM
  #2  
mikefar
Driver School Candidate
 
mikefar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I feel the same way. I leased a is 250 awd and the gas mileage is horrible. I average around 18mpg, I can't wait until the turbo charged engine. But overall all I still love it.
Old 11-13-14, 07:05 PM
  #3  
tea
Lexus Test Driver
 
tea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I'm sure the turbo 4 is going to be a good engine, but I still prefer a v6. I wouldn't pay $45,000for a 4 cylinder. I don't care much about the mpg of the v6, since it'll be smoother and quieter than thw 4,which take priority for me
Old 11-13-14, 07:18 PM
  #4  
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
 
corradoMR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 8,296
Received 289 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

The NX 200t FWD is EPA rated at 22/28 MPG and takes premium.

Expect the IS with a few more ponies (though 400 lbs less weight) to have overall just slightly better mileage but if 30 MPG combined is expected, don't hold your breath. I'll guesstimate 25/31 MPG RWD and 1 MPG less for the AWD.
Old 11-13-14, 07:21 PM
  #5  
IS3F
Driver
 
IS3F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For me as others have mentioned, smoothness is priority in a luxury sedan. I also would definitely get AWD again. Also turbo 4s generally need premium anyhow. I'd want at least the 300hp I got in a car like this as well
Old 11-13-14, 07:38 PM
  #6  
jjmaxx81
Driver School Candidate
 
jjmaxx81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: NV
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I get 30 MPG and switch between eco, normal and sport mode alot and do a lot of Fwy driving for work so ok with 6 cyl. I do however miss the pull and feel of Turbo as my last 3 cars were all turbo which made it fun to drive
Old 11-14-14, 12:39 PM
  #7  
Spagolli94
Pole Position
 
Spagolli94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

If it's going to be anything like the turbo 4 in the 328i, I'd wait. The 328i can hang with the IS350 and completely smoke a 250. The low-end torque makes for immediate power at any RPM and a really wide powerband, combined with much better fuel economy. People tend to fixate on the HP number and forget about torque.
Old 11-14-14, 01:56 PM
  #8  
Imprezario
Lead Lap
 
Imprezario's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Moscow
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I own IS250 F Sport and, to be honest, waiting for IS200t. Lexus sells only IS250, 250 F Sport and non-F Sport IS300h in Russia. You can not buy IS350. The useless Camry-engined hybrid is not an option for those who seek for a sport sedan. 250 F Sport is not a race car either, but it's the most dynamic IS we can buy. On the other hand, the V6 is smooth, quiet, sounds better than 4s... and reliable like hell ) The real fuel consumption of 10-11 l /100 km is more than adequate for dead Moscow traffic, no complaints about that. But there is no reasonable way to boost the performance, 10-20 hp from intake and exhaust mods will not make any noticeable difference. So twin-scrolled 238 hp 2.0 turbo with 350 Nm of torque starting from 1650 rpm looks like an option. The whole car will be definitely lighter, so the dynamics is expected to be on par with 328i. And typical for modern turbo 4s appetite under 10 l / 100 km would be nice too. Hope Toyota have not forgotten how to build proper turbos ))

Last edited by Imprezario; 11-14-14 at 02:17 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
k0kong
GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020)
10
05-31-17 10:09 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
1
08-01-12 12:17 AM
TimC
GS - 3rd Gen (2006-2011)
28
03-04-08 06:30 PM
newis350
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
34
08-29-07 09:45 PM
sweet
RX - 2nd Gen (2004-2009)
16
05-15-06 06:33 AM



Quick Reply: thoughts on mpg w is250 vs waiting 4 turbo



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:01 PM.