Lexus IS Next to Get Turbocharged 4-Cylinder
#76
^^ Supposedly it was a carryover diesel manual transmission from European market models. These days unless gearing is specifically tall (i.e.: Chevy Cruze Eco 6-speed) manuals are no longer the most fuel efficient gearboxes.
That said, if the lower fuel economy were the ONLY downside to the IS250 6-speed manual transmission it's a negligible complaint. A bigger issue would be why it (or another 6-speed manual gearbox) wasn't put against the IS350 engine so as to justify the lower fuel economy figures and better target niche Lexus buyers who want a stick for the driver involvement with their 300+ horsepower. Some people may have wanted a 6-speed manual option but upon seeing it weren't available on the more powerful model either shrugged and bought the 350 anyway or went elsewhere if they were dead set on a stick.
That said, if the lower fuel economy were the ONLY downside to the IS250 6-speed manual transmission it's a negligible complaint. A bigger issue would be why it (or another 6-speed manual gearbox) wasn't put against the IS350 engine so as to justify the lower fuel economy figures and better target niche Lexus buyers who want a stick for the driver involvement with their 300+ horsepower. Some people may have wanted a 6-speed manual option but upon seeing it weren't available on the more powerful model either shrugged and bought the 350 anyway or went elsewhere if they were dead set on a stick.
#78
Neither would I. I'd rather have a 7MT which has already been proven in the new Corvette and 911. Beyond seven manual gears it probably wouldn't be a great experience though.
As for the fuel economy regulations... I'd much rather have a more efficient smaller displacement engine with less cylinders that is either gasoline direct injection turbo, common rail turbo diesel, or turbo gasoline hybrid rather than sacrifice the rear wheels being driven or a stick option.
There will be a time in the not too far future when even that extreme will be impossible to attain and meet CAFE requirements. At the moment, however, we aren't there yet. Lexus *could* offer the manual transmission again in the *appropriate* cars for the time being, given their new engine technologies. They just won't.
Eventually, it actually won't be something they can decide they do or do not want to offer. At the moment, it's just their choice not to. Otherwise, how would BMW, Audi, Cadillac, Ford, Chevrolet, Subaru, Mini, Fiat, etc. all be able to get away with offering traditional manuals in current models?
As for the fuel economy regulations... I'd much rather have a more efficient smaller displacement engine with less cylinders that is either gasoline direct injection turbo, common rail turbo diesel, or turbo gasoline hybrid rather than sacrifice the rear wheels being driven or a stick option.
There will be a time in the not too far future when even that extreme will be impossible to attain and meet CAFE requirements. At the moment, however, we aren't there yet. Lexus *could* offer the manual transmission again in the *appropriate* cars for the time being, given their new engine technologies. They just won't.
Eventually, it actually won't be something they can decide they do or do not want to offer. At the moment, it's just their choice not to. Otherwise, how would BMW, Audi, Cadillac, Ford, Chevrolet, Subaru, Mini, Fiat, etc. all be able to get away with offering traditional manuals in current models?
#79
I'm sorry but I think that a vehicle with a manual transmission isn't Luxury either. I would assume that someone who buys a luxurious car, wants to have a clean ride and let the car do all of the work while they relax and listen to music. They don't want to have to worry about shifting or anything like that. I like how the car comes with the manual mode and paddle shifters because when I want to use them, I can. I am not forced to use it all the time.
In general terms, a luxury item is any item at a level beyond necessary, meaning there are things in life we need and there are things in life we want, and of course there are at times overlap between the two, but the farther on the side of "want" an item falls, and the farther it drifts from "need", then the more of a "luxury" it is by definition.
So, while some might say "to me, a luxury car means ______", by the purist definition a 400HP engine is a quintessential example of a luxury item. It is in addition to, or above and beyond the amount of horsepower that is needed, and exists only for indulgence or enjoyment.
I think TV commercials have conditioned us to associate the word luxury with plush comfort, but that's not what the word means. To me when I think of the word luxury as it applies to cars, "luxury tax" always comes to mind for some reason, reminding me of a more accurate meaning of the term than what the television car salesmen want me to think it means.
#80
Neither would I. I'd rather have a 7MT which has already been proven in the new Corvette and 911. Beyond seven manual gears it probably wouldn't be a great experience though.
As for the fuel economy regulations... I'd much rather have a more efficient smaller displacement engine with less cylinders that is either gasoline direct injection turbo, common rail turbo diesel, or turbo gasoline hybrid rather than sacrifice the rear wheels being driven or a stick option.
There will be a time in the not too far future when even that extreme will be impossible to attain and meet CAFE requirements. At the moment, however, we aren't there yet. Lexus *could* offer the manual transmission again in the *appropriate* cars for the time being, given their new engine technologies. They just won't.
Eventually, it actually won't be something they can decide they do or do not want to offer. At the moment, it's just their choice not to. Otherwise, how would BMW, Audi, Cadillac, Ford, Chevrolet, Subaru, Mini, Fiat, etc. all be able to get away with offering traditional manuals in current models?
As for the fuel economy regulations... I'd much rather have a more efficient smaller displacement engine with less cylinders that is either gasoline direct injection turbo, common rail turbo diesel, or turbo gasoline hybrid rather than sacrifice the rear wheels being driven or a stick option.
There will be a time in the not too far future when even that extreme will be impossible to attain and meet CAFE requirements. At the moment, however, we aren't there yet. Lexus *could* offer the manual transmission again in the *appropriate* cars for the time being, given their new engine technologies. They just won't.
Eventually, it actually won't be something they can decide they do or do not want to offer. At the moment, it's just their choice not to. Otherwise, how would BMW, Audi, Cadillac, Ford, Chevrolet, Subaru, Mini, Fiat, etc. all be able to get away with offering traditional manuals in current models?
There's no way the manufacturers can cope with the future emission demands with a MT. There has to be a computer controlling the gears, and shift fast enough to keep the fuel consumption down.
#81
Rumor: Lexus IS to Get 2-Liter Turbocharged Four?
Rumor: Lexus IS to Get 2-Liter Turbocharged Four?
By Marcus Slater
submit to reddit
P
14-04-20-lexus-nx-turbo-engine-2.jpg
Now here's an interesting thought: What if Lexus put their new turbo four into the IS? They could call it, "The IS 200t." I can practically smell the promotional materials being printed already.
I don't hate Lexus' 2.5-liter V6, but it's not a particularly thrilling engine . For it's displacement and size and weight, it's seriously under powered . Even with the understanding that it's a base model option, the IS needs a better powerplant for it's entry level option . If the rumormill is to be believed, it'll be getting it soon.
Lexus just announced they'll be putting a 2-liter turbocharged four cylinder in the engine bay of the NX that'll make 238 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque. This is just a rumor, but honestly, this seems like a no brainer. The IS would be lighter, more powerful and more efficient, if it had what the NX has.
That'd be a break from the IS's six-cylinder heritage (in the USA, anyway), but I don't think the fanboys will mind that too much. Consider for a moment, that the four-cylinder turbo charged IS would be more powerful than every other base model IS, including the original IS 300. Also, consider that Lexus won't have the boost cranked all the way up out of the gate. I'm willing to bet that a chip will be able to get this motor past it's current 238 horsepower with ease.
A small, turbo charged, four cylinder sedan from Lexus. I never thought it'd happen. Next thing you know they'll give it a stick.
A guy can hope right?
via [Left Lane News]
Not my post but just wanted to see hear thoughts on it. When I read this in a magazine somewhere I was hopeful. Like the writer states "a guy can hope"
By Marcus Slater
submit to reddit
P
14-04-20-lexus-nx-turbo-engine-2.jpg
Now here's an interesting thought: What if Lexus put their new turbo four into the IS? They could call it, "The IS 200t." I can practically smell the promotional materials being printed already.
I don't hate Lexus' 2.5-liter V6, but it's not a particularly thrilling engine . For it's displacement and size and weight, it's seriously under powered . Even with the understanding that it's a base model option, the IS needs a better powerplant for it's entry level option . If the rumormill is to be believed, it'll be getting it soon.
Lexus just announced they'll be putting a 2-liter turbocharged four cylinder in the engine bay of the NX that'll make 238 horsepower and 258 lb-ft of torque. This is just a rumor, but honestly, this seems like a no brainer. The IS would be lighter, more powerful and more efficient, if it had what the NX has.
That'd be a break from the IS's six-cylinder heritage (in the USA, anyway), but I don't think the fanboys will mind that too much. Consider for a moment, that the four-cylinder turbo charged IS would be more powerful than every other base model IS, including the original IS 300. Also, consider that Lexus won't have the boost cranked all the way up out of the gate. I'm willing to bet that a chip will be able to get this motor past it's current 238 horsepower with ease.
A small, turbo charged, four cylinder sedan from Lexus. I never thought it'd happen. Next thing you know they'll give it a stick.
A guy can hope right?
via [Left Lane News]
Not my post but just wanted to see hear thoughts on it. When I read this in a magazine somewhere I was hopeful. Like the writer states "a guy can hope"
#83
Racer
iTrader: (12)
yeah the rumor has been around awhile though but im far from excited because the car will still be about is250 power range also with the lack of tuning support for these cars, the most youll probably be able to do is a boost controller and light bolt ons.
and still run the risk of getting pulled by a 350 lol
and still run the risk of getting pulled by a 350 lol
#85
yeah the rumor has been around awhile though but im far from excited because the car will still be about is250 power range also with the lack of tuning support for these cars, the most youll probably be able to do is a boost controller and light bolt ons.
and still run the risk of getting pulled by a 350 lol
and still run the risk of getting pulled by a 350 lol
#86
https://www.clublexus.com/forums/car...iscussion.html
#88
I wish my IS350 was faster and more fuel efficient.
By the way, have you guys look at the new generation Mercedes C Class? I kind of regretted that it didn't come out the same year as the new generation IS or else I might have bought the C350 instead. Not like I entirely dislike the design of my IS350, but that new C Class is sexy inside out with new and better technology equipped. Wonder what new technology is going to be in it for the 2016 IS?
By the way, have you guys look at the new generation Mercedes C Class? I kind of regretted that it didn't come out the same year as the new generation IS or else I might have bought the C350 instead. Not like I entirely dislike the design of my IS350, but that new C Class is sexy inside out with new and better technology equipped. Wonder what new technology is going to be in it for the 2016 IS?
#89
I wish my IS350 was faster and more fuel efficient.
By the way, have you guys look at the new generation Mercedes C Class? I kind of regretted that it didn't come out the same year as the new generation IS or else I might have bought the C350 instead. Not like I entirely dislike the design of my IS350, but that new C Class is sexy inside out with new and better technology equipped. Wonder what new technology is going to be in it for the 2016 IS?
By the way, have you guys look at the new generation Mercedes C Class? I kind of regretted that it didn't come out the same year as the new generation IS or else I might have bought the C350 instead. Not like I entirely dislike the design of my IS350, but that new C Class is sexy inside out with new and better technology equipped. Wonder what new technology is going to be in it for the 2016 IS?
It's true that a lot of cars suffer same, and some say will well how often do you look at the back of your car? The truth is probably more often than any other angles when not driving -- most of the time when I approach my car in a parking lot, I'm approaching from the back. The amount of time a driver heading in the same direction sees the back of my car is much greater than the amount of time drivers headed in the opposite direction see the front.
I just think the Lexus design team really redeemed their past, differentiated themselves with the current gen IS, and made BMW, Benz, and Audi look quite boring by comparison.
#90
I wish my IS350 was faster and more fuel efficient.
By the way, have you guys look at the new generation Mercedes C Class? I kind of regretted that it didn't come out the same year as the new generation IS or else I might have bought the C350 instead. Not like I entirely dislike the design of my IS350, but that new C Class is sexy inside out with new and better technology equipped. Wonder what new technology is going to be in it for the 2016 IS?
By the way, have you guys look at the new generation Mercedes C Class? I kind of regretted that it didn't come out the same year as the new generation IS or else I might have bought the C350 instead. Not like I entirely dislike the design of my IS350, but that new C Class is sexy inside out with new and better technology equipped. Wonder what new technology is going to be in it for the 2016 IS?