IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

Bad MPG is350 f sport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-15, 11:02 PM
  #181  
Nexx
Driver School Candidate
 
Nexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

MPG calculated by recording distance traveled divided by number of gallons at each refill. Tank topped off at each refill. Normal mode. AC/Auto temperature = Off. Grandma on the throttle. Average temperature in November ~ 70. December~ 60. January~60

100%~80% HWY = HWY
70%~40% HWY= COMBINED
30%~0% HWY = CITY


388 miles, 14.47g = 26.8mpg, 90% hwy / 10% city; Chevron
335 miles, 14.59g = 22.9mpg, 70% hwy / 30% city; Chevron
109 miles, 3.96g = 27.52mpg, 100% hwy / 0% city; Arco
76 miles, 4.31g = 17.63mpg, 20% hwy / 80% city; Chevron
301 miles, 13.48g = 22.3mpg, 70% hwy / 30% city; Chevron
334 miles, 13.51g = 24.72mpg, 70% hwy / 30% city; Chevron
299 miles, 11.78g = 25.38mpg, 80% hwy/ 20% city; 76
175 miles, 10.15g = 17.24mpg, 10% hwy / 90% city; Chevron
296 miles, 12.34g = 23.98mpg, 60% hwy/ 40% city; Chevron
121 miles, 4.43g = 27.31mpg, 90% hwy/ 10% city; Chevron
41 miles, 2.32g = 17.67mpg, 10% city; 90%; Chevron

My thoughts so far:
  • City MPG is not very good.
  • Combined MPG is higher than EPA estimates. I generally spend more time on the hwy than the city so MPG might be a little skewed toward higher MPG during combined driving.
  • Can't get to 28mpg on the HWY.

2015 IS350 RWD F-Sport.

Last edited by Nexx; 01-27-15 at 11:09 PM.
Old 01-28-15, 03:42 AM
  #182  
Loe
Pole Position
 
Loe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

currently having a hard time hitting EPA estimates for highway only, and . im near sea level and it's flat here...
Old 01-28-15, 07:55 AM
  #183  
rgonza1
Driver
 
rgonza1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: AZ
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I average about 22 mpg (70% highway 30% surface streets). I have been testing on ECO mode and I still can't get above 22 mpg. I've heard of other users getting about 27-29 mpg in ECO mode.
Old 02-03-15, 07:06 PM
  #184  
Savjam
Pit Crew
 
Savjam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

The mileage on the IS 350 is worst than expected. You can meet or exceed Lexus EPA numbers if you keep the rpms steady and low. Spirited driving will yield atrociously poor mileage and normal driving worst than expected. The 335i engine from BMW is much more fuel efficient under the same driving conditions. Lexus can do better, but I guess they have higher priorities right now.

Savjam
Old 02-03-15, 09:54 PM
  #185  
computerwi
Advanced
 
computerwi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 638
Received 48 Likes on 35 Posts
Default



See my stats above after 4000 km in mostly winter conditions. Coming from a 4-cyl Acura TSX, the IS350 is much heavier in fuel consumption. With that, comes more power and a better driving experience
Old 03-22-15, 07:44 PM
  #186  
Savjam
Pit Crew
 
Savjam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
Received 59 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nexx
MPG calculated by recording distance traveled divided by number of gallons at each refill. Tank topped off at each refill. Normal mode. AC/Auto temperature = Off. Grandma on the throttle. Average temperature in November ~ 70. December~ 60. January~60

100%~80% HWY = HWY
70%~40% HWY= COMBINED
30%~0% HWY = CITY


388 miles, 14.47g = 26.8mpg, 90% hwy / 10% city; Chevron
335 miles, 14.59g = 22.9mpg, 70% hwy / 30% city; Chevron
109 miles, 3.96g = 27.52mpg, 100% hwy / 0% city; Arco
76 miles, 4.31g = 17.63mpg, 20% hwy / 80% city; Chevron
301 miles, 13.48g = 22.3mpg, 70% hwy / 30% city; Chevron
334 miles, 13.51g = 24.72mpg, 70% hwy / 30% city; Chevron
299 miles, 11.78g = 25.38mpg, 80% hwy/ 20% city; 76
175 miles, 10.15g = 17.24mpg, 10% hwy / 90% city; Chevron
296 miles, 12.34g = 23.98mpg, 60% hwy/ 40% city; Chevron
121 miles, 4.43g = 27.31mpg, 90% hwy/ 10% city; Chevron
41 miles, 2.32g = 17.67mpg, 10% city; 90%; Chevron

My thoughts so far:
  • City MPG is not very good.
  • Combined MPG is higher than EPA estimates. I generally spend more time on the hwy than the city so MPG might be a little skewed toward higher MPG during combined driving.
  • Can't get to 28mpg on the HWY.

2015 IS350 RWD F-Sport.
I am getting about the same mileage under the same conditions - primarily using ECO mode and babying the throttle about 75% of the time. The rest of time I drive aggressively in sport + mode. I did notice better mileage after 3,000 miles.
Old 03-23-15, 04:51 PM
  #187  
Nexx
Driver School Candidate
 
Nexx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've driven 3000+ miles and haven't noticed a significant increase in MPG to suggest that there's a "break in period" before MPG will improve.

My experience hasn't changed since I last reported.
  • Combined driving is as advertised if not better than EPA estimates.
  • City is a struggle. 17~ is still the norm. Don't know how EPA got 19 MPG in the city. I think I'm doing something wrong or there's something wrong with my car.
  • Highway is acceptable. 27~ MPG is not impressive but within advertised specs. No real complaints considering the expectations.

Last edited by Nexx; 03-23-15 at 04:57 PM. Reason: list
Old 03-23-15, 06:56 PM
  #188  
Loe
Pole Position
 
Loe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My combined average gets higher with each tank (nearing 8,000miles now), and it actually improved 1.7 mpg since 5,000miles. Heres to looking up
Old 04-04-15, 06:04 AM
  #189  
Loe
Pole Position
 
Loe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had to do a drive at 95% interstate hovering between 70-80mph on I-75 and I-4 (for those that have been on I-4 know the congestion and how the speeds are never steady when you are surrounded by a pack of cars)...

I took a quick snap when I switched over to the extended gauge mode and saw my after refueling MPG was at 32.9mpg (my overall that day was 34.1mpg when I got home to Sarasota, FL from the Sanford/Orlando area)
Attached Thumbnails Bad MPG is350 f sport-2015-04-02-19.45.26.jpg  
Old 04-04-15, 06:13 AM
  #190  
wthrman2
Lead Lap
 
wthrman2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: ON
Posts: 3,532
Received 3,544 Likes on 1,734 Posts
Default

While I am not one to give money to the gas companies, I was fully aware that this car wasn't the greatest on fuel when I got it but I don't put lots of mileage annually on my toy (~10 000 - 12 000km) so even if this gets 4L more per 100 km than my TL SH-AWD got, it is only about 200-300$ a year extra. The pleasure I get from this car is worth the extra 300$ a year and I can easily save some money elsewhere and besides, life is too short to be driving something better on fuel that I wouldn't be as happy with.

At least, that is how I feel now
Old 06-04-15, 12:51 PM
  #191  
PurplePoo
Driver School Candidate
 
PurplePoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: ca
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bought this bad girl in summer of 2013. It now has 12k miles. Today, I did a 180 mile road trip. Averaged 38 mpg in standard mode at crushing speeds. If I draft I know I would have done better. There are many things you need to do when trying to get the best mph from your car. As stated earlier, another member got 30's. It's not impossible.




Originally Posted by wthrman2
While I am not one to give money to the gas companies, I was fully aware that this car wasn't the greatest on fuel when I got it but I don't put lots of mileage annually on my toy (~10 000 - 12 000km) so even if this gets 4L more per 100 km than my TL SH-AWD got, it is only about 200-300$ a year extra. The pleasure I get from this car is worth the extra 300$ a year and I can easily save some money elsewhere and besides, life is too short to be driving something better on fuel that I wouldn't be as happy with.

At least, that is how I feel now
Old 07-27-15, 10:01 PM
  #192  
dbs600
Lexus Test Driver
 
dbs600's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

For those who’ve experienced poor fuel economy / mpg’s, any luck having Lexus acknowledge and correct same? Thank you!
Old 07-28-15, 02:43 PM
  #193  
SummerRain
Driver
 
SummerRain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: California
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am not expecting good MPG in a sport sedan. My friend's C400 is making 18MPG commuting to work, local only. I am making the same with my IS350 F-Sport. I am happy with that.

I will be driving from SF to LA soon. Will report back afterwards.
Old 07-28-15, 03:55 PM
  #194  
Sexis350
Pole Position
 
Sexis350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: FL
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ok i gotta call bs on 38mpg. Factory doesnt even have it going over 30 mpg high way, yet you get better mileage than a civic.
Old 07-28-15, 04:16 PM
  #195  
Baopee
Pit Crew
 
Baopee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: texas
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

18 miles highway 7 miles local, drive on ECO mode only, i get 21 MPG.


Quick Reply: Bad MPG is350 f sport



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:56 PM.