IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

Consumer Report IS250 Smackdown!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-13, 09:42 PM
  #46  
ISFPOWER
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (20)
 
ISFPOWER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: NORTH CAROLINA
Posts: 3,236
Received 144 Likes on 119 Posts
Default

also, im sure real drivers will get better times than these magazine and blog drivers.
ISFPOWER is offline  
Old 10-23-13, 09:42 PM
  #47  
SonyHome
Lexus Test Driver
 
SonyHome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MN
Posts: 1,216
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by JerryWest
Note that the above are for IS250 RWD --- anyone know the 1/4 mile times for the IS250AWD?

CR used the smallest engine and the heaviest IS variant -- the IS250 AWD for its study

0-60 mph time comparisons
----------------
3IS 250AWD 8.3
3IS 250RWD 7.6
3IS 350AWD 5.7
3IS 350RWD 5.6
It's interesting that 250 variants have .7 difference while the 350 variants only have .1 difference.
SonyHome is offline  
Old 10-23-13, 10:55 PM
  #48  
tclakfan
Driver School Candidate
 
tclakfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I actually think its a good thing (for those that want to pick up an IS) I am in the market for a IS, Maybe a little negativity might slow sales a bit and more room for a better deal?!
tclakfan is offline  
Old 10-23-13, 11:57 PM
  #49  
alexlude
Lead Lap
 
alexlude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cali
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For those that care.. a KBB analyst going against CR's latest reviews... and Lexus going to follow up with CR.. let's see how this pans out...

http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/...ports/3146525/
alexlude is offline  
Old 10-24-13, 12:32 AM
  #50  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,678
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

The CR video above wasn't that bad. They did their usual complaining like they do with most cars. Other than the acceleration, which was stupid to pick the slowest test car, everything else panned out decent. Again, no good reason not to recommend it. They've tested a million cars in the past with "slow" acceleration and recommended those.

For the record, according to the numbers, the 3IS 250 RWD should be faster than the 2IS 250 RWD. Lexus listed the 2IS at 7.9 and the 3 is down to 7.6.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 10-24-13, 12:48 AM
  #51  
alexlude
Lead Lap
 
alexlude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cali
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blksolara
Here is the official quarter mile times:

2IS 250 - 15.6
2IS 350 - 13.3

3IS 250 - 15.4
3IS 350 - 13.4

ISF - 12.6
curious, where did u find these official qtr mile times for 3IS? for some reason i thought it was in the low 14s (3IS 350 RWD)
alexlude is offline  
Old 10-24-13, 07:29 AM
  #52  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,574
Received 2,519 Likes on 1,817 Posts
Default

CR told me my refrigerator was boring to drive too, but I bought it anyways and couldn't be happier
SW17LS is online now  
Old 10-24-13, 08:08 PM
  #53  
Ramon
Lexus Champion

 
Ramon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,553
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexlude
curious, where did u find these official qtr mile times for 3IS? for some reason i thought it was in the low 14s (3IS 350 RWD)
I'd like to see what makes these times "official" also
Ramon is offline  
Old 10-24-13, 08:18 PM
  #54  
eyeball
Lead Lap
 
eyeball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: California
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't know that only 20 percent of buyers go for the IS350 vice 250
eyeball is offline  
Old 10-24-13, 11:51 PM
  #55  
alexlude
Lead Lap
 
alexlude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Cali
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You do know a similarly optioned 335i msport is 60k+ right (before tax + license) Not getting that power for free!
alexlude is offline  
Old 10-25-13, 02:46 AM
  #56  
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
 
corradoMR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 8,296
Received 289 Likes on 210 Posts
Default

^^^It's uncanny how a select few reviews of the 250 have been at polar opposite to the 350 primarily due to the power, yet 80% of the IS purchases are of the 250 despite the small price savings of less than 4K. It's unfortunate in your case but majority of 250 owners are content with the peppy smooth V6, better fuel economy, lower insurance costs, and the initial cost savings. I am twice a 250 AWD owner now and power is extremely relative and subjective, almost to the same degree as styling. It's clear the market's focus with sales of the IS has and continues to be on the 250 with now a greater demand for the F-Sport than expected. Majority dictates - simple law of economics. If 250 sales continue to dominate, this weakens the case to replace it with the upcoming 2L turbo (240-260 hp) sooner rather than later. I believe when that will happen, will the automotive community then criticize the 350 for not having significantly greater performance for the extra 4k making the new value proposition the IS200t?
corradoMR2 is offline  
Old 10-25-13, 03:42 AM
  #57  
CtSFox
Lead Lap
 
CtSFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexlude
You do know a similarly optioned 335i msport is 60k+ right (before tax + license) Not getting that power for free!
Besides that, the IS350 F Sport handles better and provides an overall superior driving experience than the 335i. BMW turbocharged motor provides more low end torque, that's about all. AND,,,let me tell you, as a former owner of several BMW's, they don't seem quite as sexy as the power windows, cooling systems,, fuel pumps, etc. begin to fail as the miles roll along.
CtSFox is offline  
Old 10-25-13, 11:52 PM
  #58  
JayRo354
Rookie
 
JayRo354's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: WA
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Well those other companies have to do something else to sell their cars since saying they have the best stuff in a commercial isn't working too well. I sampled the competition before I made my choice. I was not impressed. We all have our favorites . Aside from the bad press; the reality is that the consumer will be the one to decide.
JayRo354 is offline  
Old 10-26-13, 12:22 AM
  #59  
azmojo
Instructor
 
azmojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 115 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

I decided CR was trash years ago when they had greatly different reviews for the Eagle Talon and Mitsubishi Eclipse, even though they were the same car and rolled off of the same assembly line. CR is a joke.
azmojo is offline  
Old 10-26-13, 07:50 AM
  #60  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by azmojo
I decided CR was trash years ago when they had greatly different reviews for the Eagle Talon and Mitsubishi Eclipse, even though they were the same car and rolled off of the same assembly line. CR is a joke.
That's carrying a grudge for a long time LOL.
LexBob2 is online now  


Quick Reply: Consumer Report IS250 Smackdown!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:39 PM.