View Poll Results: New TSX vs IS250 vs IS350
IS250
32
16.58%
IS250 AWD
24
12.44%
IS350
123
63.73%
Acura TSX
14
7.25%
Voters: 193. You may not vote on this poll
New TSX vs ISX50
05-16-08, 05:15 AM
#47
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Lake Country, WI
Posts: 2,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TSX Part II- latest review
Didn't expect so many comments/views on TSX vs ISX50, so here's Edmunds' review:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
Last edited by rdgdawg; 05-16-08 at 05:20 AM.
05-16-08, 05:28 AM
#48
Pit Crew
Agreed. The only four-cylinder sedan remaining in the Japanese luxury market would benefit from a V6. That being said, the 2009 TSX's 0 to 60 time is still superior to that of the IS 250 all-wheel and rear-wheel drive, including manual.
05-16-08, 09:42 AM
#49
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: *661* CA
Posts: 2,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Didn't expect so many comments/views on TSX vs ISX50, so here's Edmunds' review:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...hotopanel..1.*
"Bottom Line: A more relaxed and sophisticated commuter device than the original TSX, but it no longer makes the cut as a driver's car."
05-16-08, 01:48 PM
#50
Lexus Fanatic
05-16-08, 02:03 PM
#51
Okay, so it's sharp.... and I haven't driven one... but when one compares all the similar featues/options... for the 250, no comparison to me, IS rules on this one.
For the 350, price does enter the equation... oh yeah, 350 has 105 more ponies...
Anyone feeling some love for the new TSX? I'm sure there are some, personally (if I didn't go with any IS) I'd go with an 08 Accord V-6 (which I drove and it handles) if I went Honda and save the $$$ over the TSX.
http://autos.yahoo.com/acura_tsx/
Thoughts?
For the 350, price does enter the equation... oh yeah, 350 has 105 more ponies...
Anyone feeling some love for the new TSX? I'm sure there are some, personally (if I didn't go with any IS) I'd go with an 08 Accord V-6 (which I drove and it handles) if I went Honda and save the $$$ over the TSX.
http://autos.yahoo.com/acura_tsx/
Thoughts?
The line should start with the TL and then they need to stick another one in the line up...between the TL and RL
my opinion
05-16-08, 06:31 PM
#53
They wouldn't have enough cars to compete without the TSX. The TL is probably going to start between 35 and 38 with the next gen so Acura doesn't have anything between 30 and 35. Also, without the TSX they only have the TL, RL, RDX, MDX. Not much of a lineup there...
05-16-08, 08:14 PM
#54
Pole Position
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
styling aside, not sure y there's no luv for the abundance of extra options u get from a 30k tsx vs a 30k IS250...
RL is already a slow seller, 6000 a year... doubt they want anything more to steal away at those sales.
RL is already a slow seller, 6000 a year... doubt they want anything more to steal away at those sales.
05-28-08, 09:27 PM
#55
Driver
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Overall, I like the interior of the TSX but since having the Lexus, I can't think about getting a car that doesn't have a touchscreen. I like Acura and I definitely like infiniti but the lack of touchscreen nav is always a turn off. That may sound cocky and conceited but manual entry with those ***** and arrows is just a pet peeve of mine after owning a Lexus.
05-29-08, 04:03 AM
#59
Pole Position
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
touchscreen on the map? or just touch screen in general? cuz the prev-gen tsx does have touchscreen, but not to point at places on the map. the tsx nav screen doesn't have the sharpest resolution, compared to those on the lexus and infiniti.. and the buttons on the touchscreen don't always give the correct button when pressed.
