IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013) Discussion about the 2006+ model IS models

Why doesn't Lexus build better handling cars?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-11-05, 08:25 PM
  #16  
sha4000
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
sha4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N.Y.
Posts: 6,853
Received 334 Likes on 288 Posts
Default

lexus is fine just doing what they do
Old 11-11-05, 08:29 PM
  #17  
jlin101
Lexus Test Driver
 
jlin101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OUMalibu
If you compare similar Lexus and BWM models, the Lexus is generally superior except for one important area: handling.

Now, I realize there is somewhat of a comfort/handling tradeoff, but they aren't mutually exclusive concepts. In fact, most will admit that while the 330 handles much better than the new IS, it also rides almost as well.


So, if it's a marketing plan, who would rather not have a lot better handling -- especially in cars like the IS -- in exchange for a little compromise on ride comfort?

I'm beginning to believe it's not so much a matter of them making that choice, but rather lacking the engineering expertise to approach what BMW does so well.


BTW, this will be my 4th Lexus so I'm very brand loyal, but they would murder BMW in sales if their cars could compete in handling.
If you recall 15 years ago when Toyota and Nissan started Lexus and Infiniti, they imitated the two German makers. Lexus copied Mercedez (luxurious and conservative), and Infiniti went after BMW (sporty and adventurous). Over the years the distinctions blurred, as Lexus started adding more performance to luxury, and Infiniti the opposite (until the current G and M series, that is). It's not that Toyota/Lexus couldn't build a great handling car, it's what they think the majority of their buyers would desire and demand. Sales number have indicated that they are indeed quite successful, with the exception of IS300 (nimble and fun to drive, but tanked in sales).
Old 11-11-05, 08:42 PM
  #18  
OUMalibu
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
OUMalibu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's a good point about Lexus and Infiniti starting off on opposite ends of the luxury/sports spectrum, but it's also obvious that Lexus has really been targeting BMW of late, not MB.

I'm not complaining... As stated, when I get my IS it will be my 4th Lexus in a row. But if they could do a little better job in the handling department, they would convert more BMW drivers.
Old 11-11-05, 08:48 PM
  #19  
meta1
Driver School Candidate
 
meta1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oh
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jlin101
If you recall 15 years ago when Toyota and Nissan started Lexus and Infiniti, they imitated the two German makers. Lexus copied Mercedez (luxurious and conservative), and Infiniti went after BMW (sporty and adventurous). Over the years the distinctions blurred, as Lexus started adding more performance to luxury, and Infiniti the opposite (until the current G and M series, that is). It's not that Toyota/Lexus couldn't build a great handling car, it's what they think the majority of their buyers would desire and demand. Sales number have indicated that they are indeed quite successful, with the exception of IS300 (nimble and fun to drive, but tanked in sales).
That's it in a nutshell. They have a formula that works. We a small community that make up a very small percentage of the Lexus market. I think the current IS350 handles very well compared to a BMW 330. If it takes a couple of drivers on a closed track pushing the cars to there limits to say the BMW handled slightly better, I wouldn't feel bad at all. I look at the trade off that the current IS250/350 provides in real world driving. We keep talking about BMW's and how much better they handle. The majority of people who own a Bimmer couldn't tell you squat about the car. What it's strong points are, etc. Most of those owners buy because of the nameplate. Im not mad at that. They are regular driving folks like most of the population. They aren't carrening around tracks. Lexus is still spreading it's wings across the globe. So if it handles 9/10 of what a BMW limits are. I will take the trade off. And I think most daily drivers will too. Above average handling, reliability, value, fit & finish, service, in most cases.
Old 11-11-05, 09:08 PM
  #20  
Zephyr
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (1)
 
Zephyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: California
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Go around and ask random people what they think about Lexus. Most hear Lexus and say "oh luxury and comfort" because Lexus is considered a luxury brand. Most people in the world are not car nuts, they just like to own a car that can take them places. And like what some people already mention, we are just a tiny percentage of the market. Lexus did a great job on this car, comfort and styling, I don't think they need to go out of their way to please a tiny specific market with one of their more affordable models, thats why we have aftermarket companies.
Old 11-11-05, 09:27 PM
  #21  
izzyracer
Driver
 
izzyracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 4CYLNDR
no, i'm pretty sure the BMW handles better. Lol.

By the by, whereabouts on the 405 could you possibly find enough turns to determine how well that car of yours handles?
Let me see, mild traffic, passing one car from the other, left to right.
Old 11-11-05, 09:34 PM
  #22  
carenthus
Driver
 
carenthus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why doesn't Lexus build better handling cars?

You ask for it you got it. The car will be coming out soon. It's the LF-A. With the LF-A introduction, Lexus will have three sport luxury cars (IS, GS, LF-A) to choose from.
Old 11-12-05, 04:07 AM
  #23  
PhilipMSPT
Cycle Savant
iTrader: (5)
 
PhilipMSPT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: In rehab...
Posts: 21,527
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OUMalibu
So, if it's a marketing plan, who would rather not have a lot better handling -- especially in cars like the IS -- in exchange for a little compromise on ride comfort?
I don't think it's about ride comfort. I think the IS cannot handle as well as a BMW because of its safety features such as VDIM. I believe that Lexus decided long ago that "Safety" is far more of a luxury than "Performance and Handling." That is why although they make performance cars, they still add computer/electronically-controlled handling components that will make them inferior to BMW and the such. Safety is something that Lexus can market (and they are on top of the game with safety), whereas performance and handling can be taken by anyone -- even Honda Civic owners.

I think that Lexus has made an excellent commitment to safety (in fact, a little too much of a commitment). By doing so, they have sacrificed handling in the performance department, and has covered it up by increasing the HP. Perhaps they can add an off button for these functions in the near future, but is unlikely as discussed on previous posts with Lexus engineers.

GOD FORBID THEY ADD THE VDIM SYSTEM TO THE LF-A!!!

We'll see how Lexus addresses this concern in the future. As for now, I think that the GS and IS will always have the safety controls such as VSC and VDIM, and will always compromise handling for safety.
Old 11-12-05, 04:54 AM
  #24  
mkaresh
Rookie
 
mkaresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You could as well ask this same question about any manufacturer. Porsche and Mazda both put out some very fine handling sports cars, but only BMW puts out a whole line of top-handling vehicles.

If you haven't driven a new 3 with sport package (but not necessarily the active steering) along a challenging road, then you should. Except that this might raise your expectations of how a car should handle, and make you dissatisfied with anything else. I've personally had trouble getting excited about past 3-Series. You really had to push them to enjoy them, and this wasn't often possible on public roads. But I find the new 3's handling very enjoyable even when far from the car's limits.

One problem with relying on the aftermarket is that I'm personally not aware of any aftermarket steering systems, and steering is a HUGE part of the equation that very few companies get right. Similarly, the manual shift mechanism in the new IS 250 feels like junk. How hard is it to get a shifter right after decades of engineering the things? Apparently pretty hard.

The answer to this question likely has to do with how organizations work. I wrote a Ph.D. thesis on the topic based on time spent inside an auto manufacturer. Steering and handling quality involve a lot of intangibles. Most organizations have a lot of trouble working with intangibles, because you've got to have experts and then--this is the hard part--trust these experts enough to put time and money into doing what they say to do, just because they're the experts and they say to do it.

Most organizations are more comfortable just dealing with "facts" and metrics. And you can't really describe steering feel in numbers. I'm sure many manufacturers have tried, but you really can't.
Old 11-12-05, 07:18 AM
  #25  
OUMalibu
Rookie
Thread Starter
 
OUMalibu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That's a very interesting perspective, mkaresh.

Emphasis and expertise in handling dynamics probably needs to be cultural... Engineers with a passion for it and that spend decades refining the subtleties. It seems Lexus has only made this a priority of late and the IS is step in the right direction and I'm sure they'll continue to make gains in this area.


I've owned Bimmers and I've really loved the way they handled and they have some great engines. Other than that, I strongly prefer Lexus.
Old 11-12-05, 09:14 AM
  #26  
lovemytrx
Driver School Candidate
 
lovemytrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Alberta
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How many people are actually going to push their cars to the limits where there would be a noticeable difference in the handling between BMW and LEXUS?

The only place that I could think of where a person would appreciate the edge in handling would be at a roadcourse or autox, otherwise its just not necessary, other than bragging rights.

Of course bragging rights do add up to sales, but Lexus has their own bragging rights since the IS is so much faster in a straight line than the 330i.
Old 11-12-05, 09:41 AM
  #27  
Gojirra99
Super Moderator
 
Gojirra99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 30,054
Received 187 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lovemytrx
Of course bragging rights do add up to sales, but Lexus has their own bragging rights since the IS is so much faster in a straight line than the 330i.
Lexus have a few more bragging rights over the BMW than just that . . . I won't mind having either, both great choices
Old 11-12-05, 10:44 AM
  #28  
BradmanOH
Driver School Candidate
 
BradmanOH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: OH
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Lexus vs. BMW

I am a recent convert from a BMW330xi and I think many people are missing an important part of the equation. Both of my previous BMW's were in the shop numerous times, sometimes for major issues. My first BMW left my wife and I stranded at an Arby's drive through when the battery shorted out. Talk about a fun time, pushing your new car into a parking spot while the entire resturant watches. . . . Whee! When I picked up the car the next day they said that some of the cars had defective batteries and mine must have been one of them. Then the transmission started popping out of 2nd, after a new transmission they again said that they had found some cars had some incorrect linkages. That first car was in the shop 13 times in 24 months. I jumped over to Audi and didn't have any issues but I didn't like the "feel" of the car, especially at higher speeds. I returned to BMW with the 330xi and I only had a few issues but I just didn't enjoy the interior and the looks.
My IS350 has performed perfectly from day one and I have been very impressed with the build quality and technology features.
Lexus has moved into BMW's performance territory but it is bringing Lexus reliability and luxury (which is a pretty big feature set). Sure Lexus could tighten up the handling a bit, but I could almost guarantee that they would get a lot of comments that the car rides rough and isn't comfortable. I think Lexus is the perfect blend of performance and luxury but everyone will have their own version of the perfect combination.

Bradman
Old 11-12-05, 12:08 PM
  #29  
Lexus3oi
Rookie
 
Lexus3oi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TX
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Zephyr
Go around and ask random people what they think about Lexus. .
i'll preface this by saying i plan on buying my first Lexus, an IS350

but what does the average person think of Lexus, BMW/Mercedes - lite
Old 11-12-05, 01:04 PM
  #30  
mkaresh
Rookie
 
mkaresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Every auto company contains a good number of skilled drivers who know what a great-handling car feels like. Similarly, there are few great ideas that haven't been thought of a number of times before by someone in each of these companies. True, some companies contain more expertise than others in various areas, but in my experience expertise isn't usually the limiting factor.

Instead, the big challenge in any of these companies is getting the company to do what you think it ought to. Any organization that truly cares about handling has the talent within it to create a great-handling car. There is certainly a cultural element to this, as cultures drive priorities.

BMW clearly listens to its creative people. If anything it listens too much, as the world hasn't exactly fallen in love with Bangle's styling or iDrive. Lately it seems as if every idea within BMW gets put into a car.

Of course, people differ in how they define great handling. Whoever's in charge of how the Corvette handles, for example, clearly has a much different definition than my own.

Originally Posted by OUMalibu
That's a very interesting perspective, mkaresh.

Emphasis and expertise in handling dynamics probably needs to be cultural... Engineers with a passion for it and that spend decades refining the subtleties. It seems Lexus has only made this a priority of late and the IS is step in the right direction and I'm sure they'll continue to make gains in this area.


I've owned Bimmers and I've really loved the way they handled and they have some great engines. Other than that, I strongly prefer Lexus.


Quick Reply: Why doesn't Lexus build better handling cars?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 AM.