IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Aggressive fitment IS-F pics!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-15, 09:24 PM
  #706  
shyguyF
Lead Lap
 
shyguyF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: il
Posts: 552
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jleonard71
You're right, I didn't even think about that. A 295 tire on a 9.5 wheel is going to bulge out quite a bit past the edge of the wheel since a 9.5" wheel is a lot narrower (9.5 x 25.4 = 241mm). With a 9.5" wheel the 295mm tire is going to be 54mm wider than the bead seat, in other words it will stick out 27mm on each side. But a 305 tire on an 11" wheel is only going to be 25.6mm wider (11 x 25.4 = 279.4mm) than the bead seat, and stick out 12.8mm (1/2") past the beat seat on each side - which would put it about flush with the outer edge of the wheel since most wheels have about 1/2" from the bead seat to the outer edge. So even though his 19x11 +61 wheel sticks out 3mm more than a 19x9.5 +45 and a 305 tire is 5mm wider on each side, the 295 tire on the 9.5" wheel would actually protrude a whopping 14.2mm more than a 305 tire on an 11" wheel. Very interesting.

As for your comment about being lowered, I would think that would give you a little less clearance on the outside since the wheels get pushed out a bit as you lower it - but it also tilts the top of the wheel in a little giving it a slight negative camber (unless you have that adjusted after lowering it).

I have spent the last few days reading countless posts about wheel fitment and I'm trying to come up with exactly what you said - get the most aggressive fitment without having the rubber stick out past the fender lip and without needing major modification to the fender. But I don't know if I want to go with a heavy 11" rear wheel, I want to keep it as lightweight as possible.

Using your 19x11 +61 as a baseline, I'd likely go with one of these:

9x9.5 +42 265/35


9x10 +52 285/30
Hey Jleo !
You can PM the Bnizzle87 member here, he is running on 9.5" rear wheels with 295/30 michelin PSS tires
Old 03-16-15, 09:42 PM
  #707  
jleonard71
Intermediate
 
jleonard71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shyguyF
Hey Jleo !
You can PM the Bnizzle87 member here, he is running on 9.5" rear wheels with 295/30 michelin PSS tires
He's one of the guys I read about, he needed to roll & pull the fenders and I think still rubbed slightly. Another guy also got the Volk G25's in 19x9.5 +45 w/295 and also had problems rubbing even after rolled & pulled fenders. But if you read above I figured out why that is, because the 295 tire sticks out quite a bit past the edge of a 9.5 wheel compared to a 11" wheel where a 305 tire is flush with the edge.
Old 03-16-15, 10:32 PM
  #708  
jleonard71
Intermediate
 
jleonard71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

For anyone who is interested, using KJH's specs (which I feel gives the perfect combo of aggressiveness & functionality, with little to no fender modification needed depending on the tires) and the willtheyfit.com fitment calculator, I came up with this chart of wheel sizes along with the corresponding offsets & tire sizes which will give the exact same stance. I also included tire diameters if you want to match front-to-rear or prefer the rears slightly larger. These numbers are going to be +/- a few mm depending on what tires you're running. You could probably get away with 3-4mm less in front and 2-3mm less in back if you're at stock height, and easily 5-7mm less in back if you don't mind rolling the fenders (which can be done for pretty cheap at any body shop).

FRONT:
Size Offset Tire size Tire diameter
19x8 +26 225/40 662.6
19x8.5 +36 245/35 654.1
19x9 +42 255/35 661.1
19x9.5 +49 265/35 668.1

REAR
Size Offset Tire size Tire diameter
19x9 +35 255/35 665.6
19x9.5 +41 265/35 668.1
19x10 +51 285/30 653.6
19x10.5 +56 295/30 659.6
19x11 +61 305/30 665.6

Last edited by jleonard71; 03-16-15 at 11:54 PM.
Old 03-16-15, 10:33 PM
  #709  
shyguyF
Lead Lap
 
shyguyF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: il
Posts: 552
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Right now i'm running on 19x11" +52 Forgestar CF10 with 275/35r19 on stock suspension. No fender modded at all. I still see a little room for 285/30r19 tires for next time.
You can check on Modbargain.com for customing your offset. 19x11 forgestar wheels is not heavy just about the same stock wheels.
Old 03-16-15, 10:54 PM
  #710  
jleonard71
Intermediate
 
jleonard71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by shyguyF
Right now i'm running on 19x11" +52 Forgestar CF10 with 275/35r19 on stock suspension. No fender modded at all. I still see a little room for 285/30r19 tires for next time.
You can check on Modbargain.com for customing your offset. 19x11 forgestar wheels is not heavy just about the same stock wheels.
Obviously you can always run a lower offset with a narrower tire, but my chart was meant for people who prefer a wider tire that is flush with the edge of the rim rather than being stretched at all.

And your numbers actually match up spot on with the chart I posted. A 275 tire on an 11" wheel is 30mm narrower than a 305, so it sticks out 15mm less on the outside. And your 52mm offset is 9mm less than 61mm so it sticks out 9mm more - which means you still have 6mm of clearance before the edge of the tire is where the 305 is on KJH's setup. So yes, you should definitely be able to get away with a 285 tire since they will only sticks out 5mm more than the 275's. But if you were to go with a 295 then you'd definitely need to roll your fenders to get the additional 5mm of clearance needed, and possible even pull them slightly depending on if they have a large "rim saver" on the outer edge or not.

Last edited by jleonard71; 03-16-15 at 11:43 PM.
Old 03-17-15, 08:49 AM
  #711  
FIGS
The Maker
iTrader: (11)
 
FIGS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 2,292
Received 141 Likes on 73 Posts
Default

one thing to note on 305 fitment is that we tested 5 different tires in this size all with different section widths. The PSS was by far the widest adding nearly 1" to the width over the narrowest tire. Also some wheels have a 1/4" protrusion on the rear lip making fitment more critical than others. There are no absolutes in wheel fitment which is one more reason we have a full linked rear end to make small adjustments for wheel and tire fitment.
__________________
Redefining Lexus Aftermarket Parts Since 2001
-- We are your Lexus suspension experts--
BCR - KW - PENSKE - OHLINS - HKS - GREDDY - STANCEPARTS
Links - Arms - SuperPro Poly Bushings - Solid Bearing Conversions - Motor Mounts
RB BBK's and 2P Rotors, G-Loc pads, Radium Fuel Systems
Custom Fabrication Design and Machining - Industrial 3D Printing - Laser Cutting
2018 USTCC Sportsman Class Champions - 2018 NASA ST5 National Champions
Old 03-17-15, 08:52 AM
  #712  
jleonard71
Intermediate
 
jleonard71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FIGS
one thing to note on 305 fitment is that we tested 5 different tires in this size all with different section widths. The PSS was by far the widest adding nearly 1" to the width over the narrowest tire. Also some wheels have a 1/4" protrusion on the rear lip making fitment more critical than others. There are no absolutes in wheel fitment which is one more reason we have a full linked rear end to make small adjustments for wheel and tire fitment.
Exactly, that's why I said those measurements are +/- a few mm depending on what tires you're running. I realize there are no absolutes, this just gives people a ballpark idea as to what size rims will fit with the lowest offset w/largest tire size without any concern of rubbing. If you use narrower tires or roll the fenders you can get away with 5-10mm less offset, if you use wider tires you'll have to use a few more mm offset. And the numbers I listed are actually with PSS tires on a lowered car, so any other tire on either a lowered or stock ride height should fit with room to spare.

Last edited by jleonard71; 03-17-15 at 08:56 AM.
Old 03-17-15, 11:29 AM
  #713  
STLblueF
Pole Position
iTrader: (3)
 
STLblueF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mo
Posts: 379
Received 18 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

I ordered a set of forgestar CF5V wheels in 19x9 +35 & 19x10 +45. Will I be able to fit bridgestone potenza S-04's in 295/30/19 in the rear with rolling the fenders on stock ride height, or is that going to rub pretty much regardless? I haven't ordered the tires yet so I can still downsize them if need be.
Old 03-17-15, 11:50 AM
  #714  
jleonard71
Intermediate
 
jleonard71's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: AZ
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STLblueF
I ordered a set of forgestar CF5V wheels in 19x9 +35 & 19x10 +45. Will I be able to fit bridgestone potenza S-04's in 295/30/19 in the rear with rolling the fenders on stock ride height, or is that going to rub pretty much regardless? I haven't ordered the tires yet so I can still downsize them if need be.
I had 19x10 +50 with 295 tires at stock height and they barely rubbed when the suspension was fully compressed, such as going over a large dip in the road at high speeds or going into a steep driveway too quickly. I couldn't even fit my finger tip between the tire and fender lip, it was that close, but it wasn't bad enough to make me want to get the fenders rolled. Therefore I think a 19x10 +45 w/295 would definitely rub since they'd stick out 5mm (.20") more. If you get 285/30 they would fit like my previous 19x10 +50 295 setup with very minor rubbing on occasion, or if you really want 295's just spend a few bucks and have the fenders rolled and they should fit fine. That's assuming you're at stock height. If you're lowered you might not even be able to get away with 285's on 19x10 +45 without rolling the fenders.

By the way, great taste in wheels! That's one of the wheels I'm looking at to replace mine that got stolen.
Old 03-18-15, 09:37 AM
  #715  
Sean
Lead Lap
iTrader: (3)
 
Sean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: FL
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by STLblueF
I ordered a set of forgestar CF5V wheels in 19x9 +35 & 19x10 +45. Will I be able to fit bridgestone potenza S-04's in 295/30/19 in the rear with rolling the fenders on stock ride height, or is that going to rub pretty much regardless? I haven't ordered the tires yet so I can still downsize them if need be.
I have the same exact wheels and offsets with PSS 275/30 lowered only .5" in the rear. I think 285/30 S04s would work fine without rolling but 295s would it would be necessary, even at stock height. For the front I have 245/35 PSS lowered 1" and I have almost no clearance from fender liner turned full clock either way. Front only rubs if I hit a huge dip (I've only noticed one time.)

I'm mostly leaning toward the same exact tires I have now for my next set, but if you get 295s please report back. I'll definitely be curious how they look and feel.
Old 03-19-15, 08:36 AM
  #716  
MileHIFcar
Pole Position
 
MileHIFcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,672
Received 402 Likes on 256 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jleonard71
For anyone who is interested, using KJH's specs (which I feel gives the perfect combo of aggressiveness & functionality, with little to no fender modification needed depending on the tires) and the willtheyfit.com fitment calculator, I came up with this chart of wheel sizes along with the corresponding offsets & tire sizes which will give the exact same stance. I also included tire diameters if you want to match front-to-rear or prefer the rears slightly larger. These numbers are going to be +/- a few mm depending on what tires you're running. You could probably get away with 3-4mm less in front and 2-3mm less in back if you're at stock height, and easily 5-7mm less in back if you don't mind rolling the fenders (which can be done for pretty cheap at any body shop).

FRONT:
Size Offset Tire size Tire diameter
19x8 +26 225/40 662.6
19x8.5 +36 245/35 654.1
19x9 +42 255/35 661.1
19x9.5 +49 265/35 668.1

REAR
Size Offset Tire size Tire diameter
19x9 +35 255/35 665.6
19x9.5 +41 265/35 668.1
19x10 +51 285/30 653.6
19x10.5 +56 295/30 659.6
19x11 +61 305/30 665.6
Thanks for putting up this chart based off of KJH's specs I think his set up looks great and fits all underneath the fenderliners without modifications. This is what I will look at in the future when I get an F and want to put on some aftermarket wheels which is usually the first thing I do
Old 03-19-15, 01:04 PM
  #717  
yosacchmo
Driver School Candidate
 
yosacchmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anybody have a pic of 19x10 +22 in the rear or 19x9 +22 all around. Would really like to do a set of 19inch rpf1 on my F
Old 03-19-15, 01:21 PM
  #718  
Meraki Autoworks
Your #1 Lexus Vendor
iTrader: (8)
 
Meraki Autoworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: CA - USA
Posts: 18,478
Received 668 Likes on 590 Posts
Default

Dont think the 19x9 +22 will fit in the rear, if so its going to be super super aggressive.
__________________

Your #1 Dealer for Aftermarket Performance Products
Orange County, CA
Email: info@merakiautoworks.com
Text/Call: 213 394 2886
Website: www.MerakiAutoworks.com
Old 03-19-15, 02:03 PM
  #719  
MGordo
Driver
 
MGordo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Alberta
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

19x9 +22 aren't that bad.. all depends on the tire.
I had 9.5s +22 in the rear and couldnt have anything bigger than a 235. (Which isnt very reasonable)
Old 03-19-15, 02:22 PM
  #720  
Fsport2UR
Pole Position
 
Fsport2UR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 308
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jleonard71
FRONT:
Size Offset Tire size Tire diameter
19x8 +26 225/40 662.6
19x8.5 +36 245/35 654.1
19x9 +42 255/35 661.1
19x9.5 +49 265/35 668.1

REAR
Size Offset Tire size Tire diameter
19x9 +35 255/35 665.6
19x9.5 +41 265/35 668.1
19x10 +51 285/30 653.6
19x10.5 +56 295/30 659.6
19x11 +61 305/30 665.6

Originally Posted by MileHIFcar
Thanks for putting up this chart based off of KJH's specs I think his set up looks great and fits all underneath the fenderliners without modifications. This is what I will look at in the future when I get an F and want to put on some aftermarket wheels which is usually the first thing I do

jleonard71, what calculations are you using to get the offset. There is actually a simple calculation to use for different width wheels and how to determine the same offset. Your offsets look off to me. So I was just wondering how you determined your settings. I also came up with my own chart but with all different offsets, and not just Kens settings.

But going by Kens offset in the rear with +61, I have the following.
REAR
Size Offset
19x11 +61
19x10.5 +55
19x10 +48
19x9.5 +42
19x9 +35

Last edited by Fsport2UR; 03-19-15 at 02:25 PM.


Quick Reply: Aggressive fitment IS-F pics!



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:05 AM.