Those with a ECU tune , results please
#451
#452
What was the DA between the runs though. DA, especially negative, has a massive impact on ET/MPH. You need to correct all times to standard conditions in order to have any hope of gauging power modification gains/losses. Negative DA conditions like those seen in the Northeast during the Fall/Winter/Spring months really skews the data. I've seen this for years. Most of the quickest/fastest stock and lightly modded cars reside in the NE. There's good reason for that.....negative DA. LOL
#453
What was the DA between the runs though. DA, especially negative, has a massive impact on ET/MPH. You need to correct all times to standard conditions in order to have any hope of gauging power modification gains/losses. Negative DA conditions like those seen in the Northeast during the Fall/Winter/Spring months really skews the data. I've seen this for years. Most of the quickest/fastest stock and lightly modded cars reside in the NE. There's good reason for that.....negative DA. LOL
#454
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...ect+ET+and+MPH
You can use this website help you correct your ET/MPH to SAE conditions to compare gain improvements assuming 60 foots are close. It also allows you to pull historical weather conditions in order to accurately source your DA conditions. Your 11.93@119.73mph (quite impressive, I may add) would correct to a 12.11@117.85mph in sea level/SAE conditions. Still impressive. So basically that very oxygen rich air is giving your ISF a "free" increase of power of around 20-25whp/wtq.
You can use this website help you correct your ET/MPH to SAE conditions to compare gain improvements assuming 60 foots are close. It also allows you to pull historical weather conditions in order to accurately source your DA conditions. Your 11.93@119.73mph (quite impressive, I may add) would correct to a 12.11@117.85mph in sea level/SAE conditions. Still impressive. So basically that very oxygen rich air is giving your ISF a "free" increase of power of around 20-25whp/wtq.
#456
http://www.dragtimes.com/da-density-...ect+ET+and+MPH
You can use this website help you correct your ET/MPH to SAE conditions. It also allows you to pull historical weather conditions. Your 11.93@119.73mph (quite impressive, I may add) would correct to a 12.11@117.85mph in sea level/SAE conditions. Still impressive. So basically that very oxygen rich air is giving your ISF a "free" increase of power of around 20-25whp/wtq.
You can use this website help you correct your ET/MPH to SAE conditions. It also allows you to pull historical weather conditions. Your 11.93@119.73mph (quite impressive, I may add) would correct to a 12.11@117.85mph in sea level/SAE conditions. Still impressive. So basically that very oxygen rich air is giving your ISF a "free" increase of power of around 20-25whp/wtq.
Last edited by Drok149; 04-14-16 at 12:57 PM.
#457
I would think it should help because your very limited now crossing the line. Your at a tough rpm. I experimented with shifting a few runs early at 6.3-6.5k and it didn't yield great results unfortunately
#458
Lead Lap
iTrader: (7)
I'm familiar with the site that's where I calculate my DA but from reading the stickied drag thread that's not how it's done here. DA is noted but your time is your time plain and simple. The top times from toothdoc and caymandiver are not corrected the way your stating.
I mean I've never seen anybody post their 1/4 mile runs with disclaimer "corrected SAE sea level" condition before...
If that was the case, Drok149 would hold the record for quickest FBO ISF currently because I think caymandiver's 11.87 run iirc was at a much lower DA than Drok149's.
#459
^^ Yup.
I mean I've never seen anybody post their 1/4 mile runs with disclaimer "corrected SAE sea level" condition before...
If that was the case, Drok149 would hold the record for quickest FBO ISF currently because I think caymandiver's 11.87 run iirc was at a much lower DA than Drok149's.
I mean I've never seen anybody post their 1/4 mile runs with disclaimer "corrected SAE sea level" condition before...
If that was the case, Drok149 would hold the record for quickest FBO ISF currently because I think caymandiver's 11.87 run iirc was at a much lower DA than Drok149's.
#461
Even better so those 5 things plus the tuned intake, IMHO I think 11.4-11.5 is possible in the right conditions(-1000+ DA). The biggest issue will be the shift to 5th at that point I would think.
#462
Originally Posted by Drok149
Unfortunately (for me) his was less than mine, around -1100 or -1200. The figs 2 piece rear rotors I think are a huge help as well as his 3.5lb battery, M/T's and Bc coilovers with swift springs . It's crazy a tune can pretty much offset all 4 of those things
#463
Lead Lap
iTrader: (7)
http://www.shopfigs.com/v1/index.php...product_id=127
#464
Originally Posted by RSXiMUS
I was under the impression that the FIGS 2pc were 4.5lbs lighter each in the rear and 7lbs lighter in the front?
#465
Racer
iTrader: (3)
I was under the impression that the FIGS 2pc were 4.5lbs lighter each in the rear and 7lbs lighter in the front?
http://www.shopfigs.com/v1/index.php...product_id=127
http://www.shopfigs.com/v1/index.php...product_id=127
I've seen people post different numbers, but I'm positive my 2 pc. rears were lighter than the factory ones, which I changed at 33k miles.