IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

Wider cross section tire on stock IS-F rims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-11, 05:11 PM
  #1  
J2K
Pole Position

Thread Starter
 
J2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Wider cross section tire on stock IS-F rims?

I've read several threads where people are increasing the cross section from 225 to 245 on the front and 255 to 275 on the rear tires while decreasing the aspect ratio to 35 and 30 respectively. Has anyone gone with a wider tire while keeping the aspect ratio at 40 on the front and 35 on the rear?

I'm concerned about ride quality if I go any smaller on the wall of the tire.
Old 01-12-11, 05:35 PM
  #2  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

No one would do that unless they wanted to fundamentally change the car. The sidewall height is the same with the smaller aspect ratios because the tire is wider. Ride quality does not change because of the sidewall height if the overall diameter is the same.
Old 01-12-11, 07:21 PM
  #3  
flowrider
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (9)
 
flowrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,397
Received 1,831 Likes on 1,293 Posts
Default

In other words, the tire height with a particular aspect ratio is not a constant. It is a percentage of the width of the tire and changes (goes up or down) as the width of the tire changes. Thus the width of a 285 or 295 tire with an aspect ratio of 30 is roughly the same height as a 255 tire with an aspect ratio of 35. If we go look at the specs of the Michelin PS2 tire for instance - the OD, Overall Diameter, of a 255/35/19 tire is 26". The 295/30/19 tire is also 26" or exactly the same. Since the stock rear wheel of an F is 10" wide, the 295 tire will not fit (it's too wide). However a 285/30/19 will fit, and the OD of that tire is 25.8" or only .2" shorter than the stock 255 tire.

BTW, I'm running The Continental DW in sizes 245/35/19 in front and 285/30/19 in back with great results.

Lou
Old 01-12-11, 07:26 PM
  #4  
airvtec
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
airvtec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: CA
Posts: 335
Received 17 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Change in ride quality might be minute. But you'll definitely throw off your speedo and mileage a bit.
Old 01-12-11, 07:29 PM
  #5  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by airvtec
Change in ride quality might be minute. But you'll definitely throw off your speedo and mileage a bit.
And roll center, roll axis, instant center, scrub radius, center of gravity...

I wouldn't do it personally, I value the stock performance too much.
Old 01-12-11, 07:31 PM
  #6  
flowrider
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (9)
 
flowrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,397
Received 1,831 Likes on 1,293 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by airvtec
Change in ride quality might be minute. But you'll definitely throw off your speedo and mileage a bit.
No it wont. Not if you pay attention to tire height. My 285/30 is only .2" in shorter than the 255/35 stock size or less than 1%. There is a thread somewhere here that compared our MPH numbers at a constant 2K RPM. I was off about .5MPH from folks here with stock tires.

Lou
Old 01-12-11, 07:49 PM
  #7  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

0.5 fast at 60 mph? Calculated, you should see 60.68 mph. It's a 1.18% decrease, so your odometer will show more miles than actual with smaller tires and get worse as the tires wear.

Stock rear is not 10". I wish it were. It's only 9.0 inches which is severely limiting for wider tires.
Old 01-12-11, 08:35 PM
  #8  
flowrider
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (9)
 
flowrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 10,397
Received 1,831 Likes on 1,293 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
0.5 fast at 60 mph? Calculated, you should see 60.68 mph. It's a 1.18% decrease, so your odometer will show more miles than actual with smaller tires and get worse as the tires wear.

Stock rear is not 10". I wish it were. It's only 9.0 inches which is severely limiting for wider tires.
Oops - I meant 9" And my difference in tire height is .77%, as I said less than 1%. We have had this discussion before. The tread thickness is much thicker than the less than 1% difference in tire height. The wear difference will be so insignificant, as to be negligible.

Lou
Old 01-12-11, 09:06 PM
  #9  
spekterg35
Rookie
 
spekterg35's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: arizona
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

At my last autocross there was a guy who was running 305/30 on the rear w/ 255/35 on the front. Stock wheels. They looked squeezed on, but he ran strong. No rubbing. The tires were Hankook Ventus V12 Evo K110.

Pics

Old 01-12-11, 09:41 PM
  #10  
AAM6906
Rookie
 
AAM6906's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: PA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by spekterg35
At my last autocross there was a guy who was running 305/30 on the rear w/ 255/35 on the front. Stock wheels. They looked squeezed on, but he ran strong. No rubbing. The tires were Hankook Ventus V12 Evo K110.

Pics

wow haha.......
Old 01-13-11, 05:31 AM
  #11  
mugenh22a4
Lead Lap
iTrader: (9)
 
mugenh22a4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: WA
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Call me crazy, but I like the beefy tires look.....Stretched tires to me is like a fat chick that needs to squeeze herself into shoes that are 2 sizes too small.
Old 01-13-11, 10:41 AM
  #12  
bnizzle87
Lexus Fanatic
 
bnizzle87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,595
Received 60 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

i thought about upsizing with the stock wheels, but 305 in the rear might be too much.
Old 01-13-11, 11:23 AM
  #13  
lobuxracer
Tech Info Resource

iTrader: (2)
 
lobuxracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 22,207
Received 3,849 Likes on 2,334 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lowrideraz
Oops - I meant 9" And my difference in tire height is .77%, as I said less than 1%. We have had this discussion before. The tread thickness is much thicker than the less than 1% difference in tire height. The wear difference will be so insignificant, as to be negligible.

Lou
Sorry Lou, but your calcs are wrong. Tire Rack shows the DW turning 811 revolutions per mile and the Bridgestone RE050A for the IS F turning 801. This is a 1.24% difference - even more than the calculated difference using the sizing. So it's more than you think. If resale value is any concern, you're giving away mileage by running a smaller tire. If anything, you'd want slightly larger tires. At least the odometer won't be showing more than actual mileage.

And I did figure out the speedometer/odometer uses only the rear wheels for speed calculations, not the fronts, so front size does not impact speed or distance traveled.
Old 01-13-11, 03:05 PM
  #14  
J2K
Pole Position

Thread Starter
 
J2K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
No one would do that unless they wanted to fundamentally change the car. The sidewall height is the same with the smaller aspect ratios because the tire is wider. Ride quality does not change because of the sidewall height if the overall diameter is the same.
I definitely don't want to fundamentally change the car. I really just wanted to go with a wider tire while keeping the same OD as my current stock setup. I wasn't aware that the sidewall height varies as the width changes. Thanks for the information. I appreciate it.
Old 01-13-11, 03:21 PM
  #15  
Joe Z
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (10)
 
Joe Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Under an IS F since 2008
Posts: 13,446
Received 1,058 Likes on 586 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by lobuxracer
And I did figure out the speedometer/odometer uses only the rear wheels for speed calculations, not the fronts, so front size does not impact speed or distance traveled.
Right...

When my Speedo shows me doing 80 mph, I know I'm only going around 77 mph..

I verified two ways..
http://www.miata.net/garage/tirecalcold.html

and

Also opened up the tech menu in the nav & watched the km/mph data from the vehicle speed sensor...

~ Joe Z

Last edited by Joe Z; 01-13-11 at 04:25 PM.


Quick Reply: Wider cross section tire on stock IS-F rims?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 AM.