IS F (2008-2014) Discussion topics related to the IS F model

2013 C63 AMG vs ISF with full bolt ons.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-13-13, 07:31 PM
  #1  
PhiDeltBee
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
PhiDeltBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OK
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 2013 C63 AMG vs ISF with full bolt ons.

So a good friend of mine bought a new C63 AMG P31 package in January. I've read up on the specs and it has 481hp and 443tq. But it weighs 3992lbs. We've been talking about having a little run to see how we compare. What do you guys think and outcome will be? I'm guessing we're neck to neck. We both have white cars and man do we look good driving around together!



Last edited by PhiDeltBee; 04-13-13 at 07:42 PM.
Old 04-13-13, 07:49 PM
  #2  
willys4
Rookie
 
willys4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Amg with 1.5-2 car lengths is my guess
Old 04-13-13, 07:53 PM
  #3  
itsmike177
Advanced
iTrader: (3)
 
itsmike177's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 504
Received 45 Likes on 33 Posts
Default

I've ran against a p31 C63, albeit the 08 ISF is completely stock, and it was no contest. From a standstill, the C63 kept pulling away steadily. I would say by 100mph, he was 6-7 car lengths ahead and the distance was increasing.

ISF with headers and exhaust will probably stand a better chance, but towards the top end, the C63 will still pull ahead, assuming it can lay down the traction.
Old 04-13-13, 07:54 PM
  #4  
PhiDeltBee
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
PhiDeltBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OK
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

You think? I have headers, intake and exhaust and weigh less. I drove his car and quite frankly I couldn't tell a whole lot of different than my stock (at the time) ISF.
Old 04-13-13, 07:55 PM
  #5  
PhiDeltBee
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
PhiDeltBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OK
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I believe they trap around 115 in the 1320 and it looks like with our full bolt ons, we're around 116-117 with cayman hitting 120 a few times.
Old 04-13-13, 08:05 PM
  #6  
ToothDoc
11 Second Club
 
ToothDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I honestly think we're around 470 crank HP and we have tight gearing which keeps us in our powerband so the torque advantage is a moot point (torque at the wheels is about the same IMO). The advantage is the 200 pounds - but you have all that audio stuff which offsets some of that advantage.

If you go into this all ready to run, you can beat him (ie no spare, no subs, low fuel, and shifting just right). You'll probably pull about 2 mph at the 120 mark IMO.

For comparison, I pull E60 SMG II M5s by 2 mph at the 1/4. They're 500 hp and about 4000 pounds. Of course, my car at drag racing weight is just a touch over 3500 pounds!
Old 04-13-13, 08:39 PM
  #7  
PhiDeltBee
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
PhiDeltBee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: OK
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Doc, I'll just borrow your 997.2 and be done with it. Times like these I miss having Godzilla in the garage!
Old 04-13-13, 09:14 PM
  #8  
ISF4life
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (30)
 
ISF4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SoCal714
Posts: 6,063
Received 164 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

With full bolts on , the F should get around 490 to 500 ish. and with lighter suspensions, lighter wheels trunk is empty to even out the AMG torque . Even match u better believe

Last edited by ISF4life; 04-13-13 at 09:59 PM.
Old 04-13-13, 09:22 PM
  #9  
ToothDoc
11 Second Club
 
ToothDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 963
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You can pick up an excellent condition 997 TT for around 80K these days and get an exhaust and tune! I just took mine to the strip just for a baseline. With snow tires and no track prep (couldn't take off) I got an 11.4x@127.x with a 2.0 60'. For sure, this is a mid-high 10 second car with traction. I'm sure that with the launch control and traction, I can hit 1.5x 60' times. But I don't plan on getting drag radials.

Be proud of the the F. To this day, my over 5 year old F is rock solid and squeak free (got rid of the dash squeak with some felt). My TT is only 8K miles and the spoiler rattles on bumps and there are all sorts of random squeaks. LOL Today, I managed to activate some transmission failure mode by doing a tight 180 in sport mode in the TT. Had to turn off the car and turn it back on. Hopefully, just a one time deal. You just can't beat Lexus reliability. Seriously! One of the reasons why the F will ultimately be my track car instead of the TT.
Old 04-13-13, 10:06 PM
  #10  
djhydro
Driver
 
djhydro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well my friend has a C63 and I ran him twice on the same day... He's completely stock and I have an with exhaust and intake. His first launch wasn't as great but to be honest we were running neck to neck on both runs... We went upto 125-130 from stand still
Old 04-13-13, 11:58 PM
  #11  
SpmMorrow
Driver
 
SpmMorrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ca
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by djhydro
Well my friend has a C63 and I ran him twice on the same day... He's completely stock and I have an with exhaust and intake. His first launch wasn't as great but to be honest we were running neck to neck on both runs... We went upto 125-130 from stand still
I agree 100%. I have been in the same situation with I/E only. It's a drivers race. If the amg has the right driver you could be toast. They are fast. My friend couldn't believe the F was neck and neck.
Old 04-14-13, 04:18 AM
  #12  
MRxSLAYx
Lexus Champion
 
MRxSLAYx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aventura, Florida
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A full bolt-on c63 was about a car faster than me motor to motor up to 140-150. If your car runs strong and your capable, you should be competitive.
Old 04-14-13, 07:52 AM
  #13  
Civic Si-r
Lead Lap
 
Civic Si-r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: California
Posts: 466
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Have you looked at the AMG's torque, christ the thing is a beast

No wonder the car keeps pulling even at 100mph
Old 04-14-13, 08:31 AM
  #14  
Gymkata
Instructor
 
Gymkata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 1,102
Received 28 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Below is from the Car&Driver test of a 2011 C63 with the P31 package. Basically I think it is a driver's race between an ISF with I/H/E vs stock C63 with P31. I think if both driver's launch perfectly a small edge goes to the ISF.

VEHICLE TYPE: front-engine, rear-wheel-drive, 5-passenger, 4-door sedan

PRICE AS TESTED: $77,105 (base price: $66,275)

ENGINE TYPE: DOHC 32-valve V-8, aluminum block and heads, port fuel injection

Displacement: 379 cu in, 6208 cc
Power (SAE net): 481 bhp @ 6800 rpm
Torque (SAE net): 443 lb-ft @ 5000 rpm

TRANSMISSION: 7-speed automatic with manumatic shifting

DIMENSIONS:
Wheelbase: 108.7 in Length: 186.0 in
Width: 70.7 in Height: 56.3 in
Curb weight: 3992 lb

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 3.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.1 sec
Street start, 5–60 mph: 4.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.3 sec @ 117 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 174 mph
Braking, 70–0 mph: 165 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.91 g

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 12/19 mpg
C/D observed: 13 mpg
Old 04-14-13, 09:54 AM
  #15  
LOLM3
Pole Position
iTrader: (3)
 
LOLM3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 379
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gymkata
Below is from the Car&Driver test of a 2011 C63 with the P31 package. Basically I think it is a driver's race between an ISF with I/H/E vs stock C63 with P31. I think if both driver's launch perfectly a small edge goes to the ISF.

FUEL ECONOMY:
EPA city/highway driving: 12/19 mpg
C/D observed: 13 mpg
And that is why I didn't get a C63 along with the speedy tire wear and the expensive maintenance.


Quick Reply: 2013 C63 AMG vs ISF with full bolt ons.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:37 PM.