IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

Redesigned 2017 Lexus IS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-16, 03:47 PM
  #331  
Olasek
Intermediate
 
Olasek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 489
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

NO, it is much SLOWER, multiple times slower.
I have SD in my PC, I have no HD anymore, my Windows boot up in 5-10 sec comparing to a typical HD boot of close to a minute. Plus SD doesn't suffer from defragmentation problems. People who buy PCs these days with HD are those who can't afford an SD or they have monumental storage requirements and SD would be economically impossible.
Old 06-14-16, 10:39 AM
  #332  
Jeff Lange
Keeping it Real
iTrader: (1)
 
Jeff Lange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Edmonton, CA
Posts: 5,016
Received 584 Likes on 393 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Olasek
NO, it is much SLOWER, multiple times slower.
I have SD in my PC, I have no HD anymore, my Windows boot up in 5-10 sec comparing to a typical HD boot of close to a minute. Plus SD doesn't suffer from defragmentation problems. People who buy PCs these days with HD are those who can't afford an SD or they have monumental storage requirements and SD would be economically impossible.
SD is not SSD. SD = Secure Digital, SSD = Solid State Drive. Even though an SD card is solid state memory, it is in fact quite a bit slower than most hard drives or SSD's.

The cards used in the Lexus Navigation systems are SD speed class 4, which is approximately 4 MB/sec. The fastest SD cards are UHS Class 3, which is 30 MB/sec.

Compare that to a standard-type 5400rpm or 7200rpm laptop hard drive which will average somewhere around 100-125 MB/sec. or something like the SSD in a computer which can hit over 500 MB/sec.

tl;dr: SD cards are way slower than hard drives and way way slower than SSD's.

Jeff
Old 06-14-16, 10:55 AM
  #333  
My0gr81
Lexus Test Driver
 
My0gr81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 1,363
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff Lange
SD is not SSD. SD = Secure Digital, SSD = Solid State Drive. Even though an SD card is solid state memory, it is in fact quite a bit slower than most hard drives or SSD's.

The cards used in the Lexus Navigation systems are SD speed class 4, which is approximately 4 MB/sec. The fastest SD cards are UHS Class 3, which is 30 MB/sec.

Compare that to a standard-type 5400rpm or 7200rpm laptop hard drive which will average somewhere around 100-125 MB/sec. or something like the SSD in a computer which can hit over 500 MB/sec.

tl;dr: SD cards are way slower than hard drives and way way slower than SSD's.

Jeff

Adequate for the intended use, with the advantage of improved "security" through device ID and once locked, they cannot be modified without invalidating the Device ID.
Old 06-14-16, 12:49 PM
  #334  
Olasek
Intermediate
 
Olasek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 489
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Correct, even if I were wrong about the speed of the particular device in question the fact remains that hard drive in a car these days is a relic because of its size and moving parts. How many hard drives did NASA ever put on their Mars landers or interplanetary probes - zero.
Old 06-14-16, 01:30 PM
  #335  
alvinklee
Pit Crew
 
alvinklee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: California
Posts: 130
Received 21 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Even with slower transfer rates, generally you aren't transferring very much. What SD cards have that are advantageous is faster access times to the data as hard drives take longer to access the data due to the need to seek.
Old 06-22-16, 09:14 PM
  #336  
Olasek
Intermediate
 
Olasek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 489
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
I don't like that the non-F Sport seems to have lost its fog lights, though.
Do we know that for fact or perhaps the imagery is at such angle that the lights aren't visible?
Old 06-24-16, 01:27 PM
  #337  
sc400
Lead Lap
 
sc400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Bay area, California
Posts: 439
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by abbeyrd
They use SD cards for nav/maps? That seems more archaic than the DVD disc that was in my 06 SC 430.
My BMW & MB use Hard Drives.
Actually you got it backward. When nav system first came out it was on dvd. Then it was moved to hard disk. Now it's in much smaller form like SD or SSD.
Old 06-25-16, 10:06 AM
  #338  
MoodyHank
Rookie
 
MoodyHank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 34
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff Lange
SD is not SSD. SD = Secure Digital, SSD = Solid State Drive. Even though an SD card is solid state memory, it is in fact quite a bit slower than most hard drives or SSD's.

The cards used in the Lexus Navigation systems are SD speed class 4, which is approximately 4 MB/sec. The fastest SD cards are UHS Class 3, which is 30 MB/sec.

Compare that to a standard-type 5400rpm or 7200rpm laptop hard drive which will average somewhere around 100-125 MB/sec. or something like the SSD in a computer which can hit over 500 MB/sec.

tl;dr: SD cards are way slower than hard drives and way way slower than SSD's.

Jeff
You are right Jeff except the automotive drives are 4200 rpm. We categorize them as industrial grade drives due to their higher extreme temperature and vibration tolerance than the regular consumer drives. Even with 4200rpm spin speed they are still faster than SD cards but SSD is the future of automotive drives...
Old 06-25-16, 10:09 AM
  #339  
MoodyHank
Rookie
 
MoodyHank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 34
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alvinklee
Even with slower transfer rates, generally you aren't transferring very much. What SD cards have that are advantageous is faster access times to the data as hard drives take longer to access the data due to the need to seek.
Well, the automotive HDDs generally have very small capacities (40GB, 60GB and 80GB) so only a small portion of the disc gets used so the head does not have to search long to read.
Old 06-27-16, 06:24 AM
  #340  
CrackerJac
Driver
 
CrackerJac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mo
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I really wish they would integrate the turn signal into the DRL, similarly to the NX and the new LX.
Old 06-27-16, 06:19 PM
  #341  
CarlitoIS
Intermediate
 
CarlitoIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: FL
Posts: 274
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrackerJac
I really wish they would integrate the turn signal into the DRL, similarly to the NX and the new LX.
The new RX has this also. I think it looks nicer and clean. How do we know it's not in the making for 2017?
Old 06-28-16, 07:28 AM
  #342  
mangoman75
Driver School Candidate
 
mangoman75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: NJ
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

saw the new 2017 IS on the road over the weekend. white f-sport with NY tags.. i was behind it on the highway in traffic and i was confused for a minute since the rear lights looked like a hybrid between 2014-16 IS and the new GS. looked pretty nice though. they changed the front DRL so it lights up like a bar, not dots. one thing i noticed is that the headlights were located horizontally in the middle of DRL instead of at the ends like the pre-refresh IS (unless the person had high beams on which i doubt). don't know why but for some reason it didn't look good.. oh well..
Old 06-28-16, 07:47 AM
  #343  
RoiteTrom
Pole Position
 
RoiteTrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Illinois
Posts: 370
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mangoman75
saw the new 2017 IS on the road over the weekend. white f-sport with NY tags.. i was behind it on the highway in traffic and i was confused for a minute since the rear lights looked like a hybrid between 2014-16 IS and the new GS. looked pretty nice though. they changed the front DRL so it lights up like a bar, not dots. one thing i noticed is that the headlights were located horizontally in the middle of DRL instead of at the ends like the pre-refresh IS (unless the person had high beams on which i doubt). don't know why but for some reason it didn't look good.. oh well..
I always wanted my IS DRL to be one solid beam of light instead of those dots lol.
Old 06-28-16, 08:57 AM
  #344  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 227 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

If I could give a grade for this mid model refresh, i'd give it a solid Fail. It got uglier and its just as slow while the competitors amped up their lineup (335-->340; Q50 RS with 400hp). Complete FAIL Lexus...
Old 07-03-16, 06:39 PM
  #345  
Cake
Rookie
 
Cake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone know when these will go into production?


Quick Reply: Redesigned 2017 Lexus IS



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:44 PM.