IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

IS200t Test Drive

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-12-15, 07:51 PM
  #121  
peteharvey
Lead Lap
 
peteharvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Ca
Posts: 4,173
Received 449 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

The IS250 & the IS200t are both good, but in different ways.
Both engines have their good and bad points.
Neither engine is perfect.

Horses for courses.
Each to their own...
.

Last edited by peteharvey; 10-13-15 at 09:08 AM.
Old 10-12-15, 10:39 PM
  #122  
lexusplz
Driver
 
lexusplz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: CA
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does anyone have an average MPG for IS 200t vs the IS 250?
Old 10-14-15, 07:36 AM
  #123  
bakalag
Intermediate
 
bakalag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: ca
Posts: 452
Received 403 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bakalag
I have a 2008 IS350 and got a IS200t as a loaner for a few days (recall) I did test drive a new one last week but so far I'm not a fan of the car. It has great turn in like all the 3IS's (I have driven the IS250 and IS350 very extensively) but I'm not liking the turbo lag personally, the car probably goes faster than it feels and has a smooth transition for boost though. But the aggressive first gear in my 2nd gen IS350 I like so much better personally. I still think the IS200t is great but I might have been expecting too much. I do like the shifts in the 8speed but I wish it would not shift by itself near redline. My IS350 won't upshift in S mode unless I upshift, even as slow responding as it is. I think the IS250 feels faster initially off the line, but the IS200t is faster once that boost kicks in.
So I had driven the car 350 miles roughly in multiple scenarios and I have grown to like it, I don't dislike the turbo lag as much but its still turbo lag.... but it picks up pretty quick on the freeway. About the redline thing is probably has to warm up? I noticed it held the RPMS after driving it longer on some minor twisties. So IS250 VS IS200t... I think I would lean towards the IS200t a little more, the 8 speed is just better to have than the 6 speed in terms of manual shift response. I personally would need an exhaust though. Car is too quiet stock for me personally and the speed creeps up on you and the stock suspension is comfy and handles great but a bit numb to feel a sense of speed.

I got my IS350 back now though and the IS200t is just a past memory to me now but wanted to share my input =P
Old 10-14-15, 08:46 AM
  #124  
adidas
Driver School Candidate
 
adidas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Ohio
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would you guys know if the 8speed in this thing is the ZF8 that's in the m235i?
Old 10-24-15, 03:45 AM
  #125  
Sango
Pole Position
iTrader: (10)
 
Sango's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC / Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,382
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
I was at Lexus of Seattle last week and did not see an IS200t, though they did have a new IS300.
Originally Posted by DemonIS300
I wonder if Seattle has one of these yet...I really want to test drive it and see this turbo lag you guys talk of. The turbo can't be that big to cause a 1 sec turbo lag and only producing 240 something horses. I'm sure it has to do something with how the ECU is setup on throttle response or something. Either way, I'll try to see when Seattle gets one and test it.
Lexus of Bellevue has the IS200t on display now.



Old 10-30-15, 07:24 AM
  #126  
GMan200T
Driver School Candidate
 
GMan200T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know what turbo lag the OP speaks off. Lag free is one of the features of the turbo. Make sure you're in the right gear and you'll be fine.
Old 10-30-15, 07:52 AM
  #127  
evident
Racer
 
evident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,381
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

USB color looks gorgeous. I just "test drove" a 2015 is250 AWD as a loaner. I can't imagine the 200t being worse than it in any conceivable way.
Old 10-30-15, 09:38 AM
  #128  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 227 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evident
USB color looks gorgeous. I just "test drove" a 2015 is250 AWD as a loaner. I can't imagine the 200t being worse than it in any conceivable way.
The 250 is just a weak motor. Really lackluster. The 200t should be much better but I love the 3.5L. Its a wonderfully responsive motor that feels great in any gear.
Old 10-30-15, 01:36 PM
  #129  
stlgrym3
Racer
iTrader: (4)
 
stlgrym3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,351
Received 20 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

if you can get a 350 for around $2k more than a comparable equipped 200t, go with the V6, it's proven and NA makes it solid as a rock if you would to keep the car for along time. i don't see any significant MPG gain from the 200t over 350. turbo 4's mpg always look good on paper, but in real life driving, it's only marginally better
Old 10-31-15, 03:35 PM
  #130  
sistrunk05
Rookie
 
sistrunk05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Texas
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tea
i'm the opposite. i'd take the 250 over the 200t anyday
Me too. Since I have no plans to go on a track, my IS 250 F Sport (with no mods) has more than adequate power even without using the paddle shifters or Sport mode. But if you need some extra power, put it in manual mode and let it red line as you shift because it has a great sound to it especially on a on-ramp entering highway traffic. If you get caught up in the 0-60 sec time comparisons, you'll miss out on experiencing a great sports sedan.

Last edited by sistrunk05; 10-31-15 at 03:39 PM.
Old 11-03-15, 09:44 AM
  #131  
vlad_a
Lexus Champion
 
vlad_a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,973
Received 54 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

I have no idea WTF Lexus is doing. IS200t? IS300 AWD? What's wrong with them? Neither car is progress or move in the right direction. I owned 2x IS300 for 14 years and they lost my business there. Now, I certainly will not replace our family hauler with the monstrosity RX that they have created for 2016.
I loved this article, which is dead-on on the state of things at Lexus:
http://jalopnik.com/heres-why-the-le...yor-1696229064
Originally Posted by Jalopnik
...it helps with Lexus’s ultimate goal: to attract younger customers by deliberately scaring the hell out of their elderly ones.
They sure go out of their way to reduce the average buyer age of 61. Maybe 2.0L Turbo engine is a part of this strategy. Or they had to justify building one for the NX.
Why build a turbo engine in the first place is beyond me. In the past 2 decades, Toyota has steadily moved to NA. NA is more reliable and has no lag. I would venture as far as to guess it was relevant in non-USDM markets, where there is a higher tax on anything over 2.0L.
However, that's where they Hybrids come in. In fact, Toyota targets to completely replace their fleet with Hybrids only. Now, that makes sense. And they have already done so in some countries, where diesels prevail.

P.S.
Turbos have lag... some more, some less. That's how they operate. Gets old after a while.
Old 11-04-15, 02:38 PM
  #132  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,332
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

Car and Driver's review of the 200t F Sport:

For the price, the IS200t is a stylish (assuming you’re down with that grille), luxurious, and comfortable ride that doesn’t fall down on entertaining roads. Lexus has yet to truly deliver on the promise made by the excellent IS350 F Sport that is built on this chassis, but at least the junior model isn’t bog-slow anymore.
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...rt-test-review
Old 11-04-15, 03:00 PM
  #133  
EZZ
Lexus Test Driver
 
EZZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 7,460
Received 227 Likes on 170 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JDR76
Car and Driver's review of the 200t F Sport:



http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...rt-test-review
Finally an instrumented test. Kinda disappointing...6.8 seconds to 60 and 15.3 in the quarter with 91mph trap. This car is no where near the 350 for performance.
Old 11-04-15, 03:16 PM
  #134  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,332
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

The NX200t, with that same engine, is hitting 60 in around 6.9 seconds, so I am a bit surprised that the IS didn't substantially outperform it in that measure, given the several hundred pounds less that it carries. Once again I must wonder about the 8 speed. I think this is why Motor Trend tested the 6 speed AWD IS350 quicker than the 8 speed RWD IS350 (5.3 sec vs 5.6 sec as I recall). Still, I'm okay with it because it really does represent a large improvement over the 250.

I am a bit disappointed that the review didn't really discuss what it was like to drive. No mention of NVH or turbo lag, responsiveness, etc.

Last edited by JDR76; 11-04-15 at 03:24 PM.
Old 11-04-15, 06:27 PM
  #135  
2015isboy
Driver
 
2015isboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: il
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Drove the 200t this past weekend. The car is extremely quite and has decent pull. IMO its not worth it unless you are looking for gas savings compared to the 350.


Quick Reply: IS200t Test Drive



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:06 PM.