IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) Discussion about the 2014+ model IS models

Road&Track: October 2013 - IS vs ATS vs 3 vs Q50 - WINNER?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-05-13, 10:02 PM
  #16  
05RollaXRS
Lexus Test Driver
 
05RollaXRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 9,767
Received 2,417 Likes on 1,741 Posts
Default

Those 3IS numbers almost match the 2IS especially in the 0 - 60 mph.

What were the slalom speeds??

Originally Posted by corradoMR2
0-60 / quarter mile / slalom / braking 60-0:
3: 4.9 s / 13.5 s / 0.87g / 124 ft
ATS: 5.4 s / 14.0 s / 0.89g / 119 ft
Q50: 5.3 s / 13.8 s / 0.86g / 123 ft
IS: 5.4 s / 13.9 s / 0.85g / 126 ft

The IS has the worst tires (Turanza ER 33) (3 has Potenza S001s) which explains the worst (not by much) braking and lateral grip. No surprise on the acceleration with the 3's turbo six...
Old 09-06-13, 12:34 AM
  #17  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 87 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corradoMR2
I know!!! The win is by a clear margin. And look at the score on Exterior Styling. So much for controversy...
Lexus now has it all. RELIABILITY and PERFORMANCE. This is an unstoppable force.

And let's not forget that ease of maintenance and reliability weren't even considered. Traditionally factors that Lexus excels at.

If reliability were considered, choosing an IS would be even more of a no-brainer decision...
Old 09-06-13, 12:47 AM
  #18  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 87 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by corradoMR2
0-60 / quarter mile / slalom / braking 60-0:
3: 4.9 s / 13.5 s / 0.87g / 124 ft
ATS: 5.4 s / 14.0 s / 0.89g / 119 ft
Q50: 5.3 s / 13.8 s / 0.86g / 123 ft
IS: 5.4 s / 13.9 s / 0.85g / 126 ft

The IS has the worst tires (Turanza ER 33) (3 has Potenza S001s) which explains the worst (not by much) braking and lateral grip. No surprise on the acceleration with the 3's turbo six...
Thanks for the numbers but the .85g you posted is more for skidpad. Was there a slalom speed or timing posted as well?
Old 09-06-13, 03:51 AM
  #19  
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
Thread Starter
 
corradoMR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 8,296
Received 288 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

^^^^^ True, 0.85g is the skidpad "roadholding". Unfortunately, no slalom stats. My guess is because the testing was more on the open-road than on a track and again, this is where the IS excels as an overall superior performance and real-world driving vehicle.

Other stats:
Braking Fade, NONE for the 3 and IS, LOW for the Q50 and ATS
Mild Understeer for all four.
Old 09-06-13, 06:23 AM
  #20  
asoksevil
Pole Position
 
asoksevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Irvine, CA - Madrid, ES
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Well done Lexus, well done.
Old 09-06-13, 06:44 AM
  #21  
Glashub
Lexus Test Driver
 
Glashub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 916
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Based on some of the posts I've read on this forum about how BMW blows away the Lexus in a straight line I'm surprised to see how close their times are. Granted another 50hp would be nice but still not too shabby.
Old 09-06-13, 09:06 AM
  #22  
madmax2k1
Intermediate
 
madmax2k1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CA
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Seriously, the Q50 got 2.5 for exterior styling and the IS350 got 4.5. Even the most diehard Lexus fans will find this laughable.
Old 09-06-13, 09:11 AM
  #23  
natnut
Pole Position
 
natnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2,602
Received 87 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmax2k1
Seriously, the Q50 got 2.5 for exterior styling and the IS350 got 4.5. Even the most diehard Lexus fans will find this laughable.
I've seen the IS F-Sport in the flesh and I think it's the most beautiful compact sedan on the roads at the moment. Even if it were to be docked 1 or 2 points for styling, it would still win overall, so great is its points lead over the second place finisher, the BMW 335i.
Old 09-06-13, 09:25 AM
  #24  
azmojo
Instructor
 
azmojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 115 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by madmax2k1
Seriously, the Q50 got 2.5 for exterior styling and the IS350 got 4.5. Even the most diehard Lexus fans will find this laughable.
I like the new IS styling because it doesn't look like every other car out there. TheQ50 styling is boring, the car looks like every other newer 4D sedan. The G37 was a nice looking car, but they took a step backwards with the Q. I agree with the numbers.
Old 09-06-13, 09:31 AM
  #25  
pianospike
Rookie
 
pianospike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know what it is exactly about the q50 styling, but I thought it had, despite being a bit conservative and boring, potential when the rendering below was shown.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/7643503-post12.html

And even though the final product seems close to that rendering above, it just doesn't seem to flow as well. So now all that is left is conservative and boring in my eyes.

http://wot.motortrend.com/build-your...#axzz2e3yKu6P5
Old 09-06-13, 09:59 AM
  #26  
mso4
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
mso4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The BMW boys are still recovering from the C&D and Motortrend fiasco, now this!

I believe a mutiny is about to take place in Munich lol. Great win for the Lexus!!
Old 09-06-13, 10:26 AM
  #27  
Glashub
Lexus Test Driver
 
Glashub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 916
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pianospike
I don't know what it is exactly about the q50 styling, but I thought it had, despite being a bit conservative and boring, potential when the rendering below was shown.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/7643503-post12.html

And even though the final product seems close to that rendering above, it just doesn't seem to flow as well. So now all that is left is conservative and boring in my eyes.

http://wot.motortrend.com/build-your...#axzz2e3yKu6P5
To me the roof line looks too old school and is at odd with the rest of the design. It's like they took the stately roofline of the Genesis and put it on top of a really stylized body.
Attached Thumbnails Road&Track: October 2013 - IS vs ATS vs 3 vs Q50 - WINNER?????-hyundai_genesis_-_04-13-2010.jpg  
Old 09-06-13, 11:06 AM
  #28  
dojoman
Lead Lap
iTrader: (5)
 
dojoman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,900
Received 268 Likes on 216 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mso4
The BMW boys are still recovering from the C&D and Motortrend fiasco, now this!

I believe a mutiny is about to take place in Munich lol. Great win for the Lexus!!
Well typical BMW fans will take a jab at how ugly 3IS looks and compare it to predator face. But I'll take Predator face over squish face look of BMW front end and dual kidney grills that look like every other BMW's on the road.
Old 09-06-13, 02:09 PM
  #29  
ydooby
Lexus Champion
 
ydooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: CA
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Awesome stuff!! Notice how there's not even one category where the IS scores below 4. Thanks for the scan corradoMR2!

The Q50S has the best ride quality of the four? I thought others have commented that it's too stiffly sprung.

Also, is the 335i equipped with the M-Sport package? I can't tell.

Last edited by ydooby; 09-06-13 at 03:50 PM.
Old 09-06-13, 04:40 PM
  #30  
corradoMR2
The pursuit of F
Thread Starter
 
corradoMR2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 8,296
Received 288 Likes on 209 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ydooby
Awesome stuff!! Notice how there's not even one category where the IS scores below 4. Thanks for the scan corradoMR2!

The Q50S has the best ride quality of the four? I thought others have commented that it's too stiffly sprung.

Also, is the 335i equipped with the M-Sport package? I can't tell.
No M-Sport package but from other articles out there, it didn't make a difference against the F-Sport.

And one other crucial item to publish here. Price. The IS is the BARGAIN similarly equipped as tested:

IS: $47,955
3: $49,225
Q50: $51,805
ATS: $52,405


Quick Reply: Road&Track: October 2013 - IS vs ATS vs 3 vs Q50 - WINNER?????



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 AM.