IS350 doesnt feel fast at all. Test drove one.. wth
#1
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IS350 doesnt feel fast at all. Test drove one.. wth
it doesnt feel fast at all.. is there something wrong with this one? I drove a g35 to the dealer ship and it didnt feel fast at all. Very smooth though. Is this normal.
#5
That's actually an issue, because not only is the IS350 actually faster than a G35 sedan or coupe (or G37, for that matter), but from my experience, it feels noticeably faster than the G.
If the car did not feel fast, I would be worried about potential engine issues. I can only assume this is a used car that you test drove.
So, to answer your question - no, it's not normal. Keep test driving IS350s (driver only, obviously, you don't want to test drive a car with extra weight in the passenger seats) until you find one that feels faster.
If the car did not feel fast, I would be worried about potential engine issues. I can only assume this is a used car that you test drove.
So, to answer your question - no, it's not normal. Keep test driving IS350s (driver only, obviously, you don't want to test drive a car with extra weight in the passenger seats) until you find one that feels faster.
#7
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#10
Lead Lap
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you floor it in both cars? There's no way an IS350 would be slower IRL. Pedal travel in the cars is different though, G35 has faster tip-in IMO. 2IS in general is more linear/soft feeling so it won't have "pep" off the line.
VWs are notorious for this, G is more refined but still same type of behavior. That's not to say the G is a worse car in this regard, just different.
VWs are notorious for this, G is more refined but still same type of behavior. That's not to say the G is a worse car in this regard, just different.
#11
Torque curves nothing, the IS350 gets to 45-50 MPH almost a full half second faster than the G35 6MT.
A full half second should be pretty noticeable by anybody.
Here are some things to consider - was traction control off during your test drive? The traction control in the IS350 is ridiculous in that it bogs down the car by kicking in when it's not needed. Great safety feature, but annoying sometimes.
Having traction control on can literally add a full second to your acceleration runs, depending on the street conditions, and it's very noticeable.
With traction control off and decent tires, you should be able to feel a noticeable difference, especially the 1st gear of this car. 0 to ~40 MPH in the IS350 is nearly as fast as an '03 Gallardo, for comparison, thanks to the phenomenally aggressive gearing in the IS350. Far more aggressive than the G35 or G37 which is precisely why it's faster than these vehicles despite having comparable HP.
With the G37 coupe for example, the additional 14 HP to the IS350 (rated at 316 from the factory at the crank) is pretty much entirely mitigated by the added weight. Then you take into consideration the gear ratios, and it becomes obvious why the G37 is not nearly as quick.
A full half second should be pretty noticeable by anybody.
Here are some things to consider - was traction control off during your test drive? The traction control in the IS350 is ridiculous in that it bogs down the car by kicking in when it's not needed. Great safety feature, but annoying sometimes.
Having traction control on can literally add a full second to your acceleration runs, depending on the street conditions, and it's very noticeable.
With traction control off and decent tires, you should be able to feel a noticeable difference, especially the 1st gear of this car. 0 to ~40 MPH in the IS350 is nearly as fast as an '03 Gallardo, for comparison, thanks to the phenomenally aggressive gearing in the IS350. Far more aggressive than the G35 or G37 which is precisely why it's faster than these vehicles despite having comparable HP.
With the G37 coupe for example, the additional 14 HP to the IS350 (rated at 316 from the factory at the crank) is pretty much entirely mitigated by the added weight. Then you take into consideration the gear ratios, and it becomes obvious why the G37 is not nearly as quick.
#12
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
^^^ What you said pretty much hit the nail on the head. As we've all talked about time and time again, the power, weight, and gearing has proved the IS to be faster car.
And just to reiterate what carLx stated, there are many factors why the 350 may have felt slower (quieter, traction, environment conditions) etc.
Not sure why the IS felt slow to you Dajon, but it is the faster car. I suggest looking for a different 350
And just to reiterate what carLx stated, there are many factors why the 350 may have felt slower (quieter, traction, environment conditions) etc.
Not sure why the IS felt slow to you Dajon, but it is the faster car. I suggest looking for a different 350
#15
I think car makers play around with the throttle tip in (non linear throttle mapping) to give a sense of more power. This was my experience 3 years ago when I compared the Acura TL-S to the IS 350. On the TL the throttle was so sensitive that it literally jerked my head back when I started from a stop unless I stepped on it ever so lightly. It made the TL feel faster initially but it's all smoke and mirrors.