ISx vs C-Class Interior Legroom Comparison? - Club Lexus Forums

Log In 

ISx vs C-Class Interior Legroom Comparison?

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-02-10, 10:11 AM   #1
AKFORTY7
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ON
Posts: 39
Cool ISx vs C-Class Interior Legroom Comparison?

On alot of reviews for the IS people complain about the backseat beeing cramped. I actually posted a topic about this here before. But anyways today I was doing a comparison with the C-Class which alot of people praise for beeing roomy for a compact luxury sedan class, but it only looks like the total legroom difference is 0.6 inch.

http://www.cars.com/go/compare/trimC...1A0&compType=D

so are reviewers out there just biased or what? since the ISx has more front legroom upfront, cant you compensate for the backseat legroom by adjusting the front seat or does the back still suck even after adjusting the front?

or maybe people buy compacts then biotch about legroom because they expect a compact to have same legroom as a full or mid-sized? or are americans just too fat? lol i kid i kid

Last edited by AKFORTY7; 03-02-10 at 01:59 PM.
AKFORTY7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 11:40 AM   #2
Lawr
Driver School Candidate
 
Lawr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Valencia, CA
Posts: 41
Default

I've got an IS and my gf has a C300, the IS does have the feeling of being smaller in the backseat. I wouldn't call the C class roomy though, my 530i was what I would call the bare minimum of "roomy" for the back seat. I would just rack it up as both cars are ok if you don't have to have passengers all the time. Otherwise if you have a family, it would be ok as long as the kids are babies or very young still...
Lawr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 11:57 AM   #3
Rash
hmm
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: dxb
Posts: 12,133
Default

There was a good diagram charts about legroom/headroom comparison for IS, A4, 3-series and C-class. But I read it here long long time ago.
Rash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 11:58 AM   #4
Phil888
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Phil888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 2,990
Default

Their all the same to me. it depends on how the two seats are seated when ppl are sitting the rears. Right now, i only allow one person to sit in the back lolz.. but yeah seems like alot of ppl are biased when comparing Lexus to mercedes and BMW. Love it or Hate it!
Phil888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 01:26 PM   #5
bnizzle87
Lexus Fanatic
 
bnizzle87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,287
Default

the 0.6 inches is miniscule considering the overall configuration of the cars. theres more front seat room for the IS i think, whereas the C class felt it had more rear room (which made the front a bit cramped). some people recline further back than others, while others in the rear may not be very big- thus not needing too much rear leg room. it depends on who's in the car. both my parents sit in the back of my IS, and they're fine with it. with guys in the backseat, they tend to complain more because their knees are rubbing against the back of the front seat much of the time. but theres no rubbing. my dad even says its large enough for him (6'0", ~200 lbs).

on a completely off note, my sister's corolla s has an absurdly amount of rear leg space, even when both front seats are reclined at a good incline. i thought this was odd considering the car itself isnt even that big. haha
bnizzle87 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 01:34 PM   #6
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Many times seeing the difference in dimension size does not paint the picture. In some cars that should be smaller I fit better in.

You have to look at the IS design to see why the rear is so cramped. The IS really tapers to the rear and the C-pillar is inset compared to where the doors/body is, offering a smaller shoulder area for the rear.

It makes for a beautiful looking sedan though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-10, 02:10 PM   #7
AKFORTY7
Driver School Candidate
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: ON
Posts: 39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bnizzle87 View Post
on a completely off note, my sister's corolla s has an absurdly amount of rear leg space, even when both front seats are reclined at a good incline. i thought this was odd considering the car itself isnt even that big. haha
very true, it sucks how many smaller/cheaper cars still beat out the ISx on rear legroom; some examples:

Kia Rio
Suzuku SX4
Toyota Yaris
Hyundai Elantra

http://www.cars.com/go/compare/trimC...,USB80HYC021A0

lol

i wonder how much this issue has impacted sales. i guess i have to go in to the delearship and try out the seats myself. im 6' most of my friends are about 6' but they are legroom-whoores. one of my friends would rather get a camry than an ISx
AKFORTY7 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My In-depth Review of the IS300h rayaans IS - 3rd Gen (2014-present) 14 06-02-15 02:26 PM
First Drive: 2015 Mercedes-AMG C63 S Hoovey2411 Car Chat 15 02-25-15 04:25 PM
First Drive: 2014 Mercedes-Benz CLA250 Sport Hoovey2411 Car Chat 35 10-23-14 06:57 PM
Review: 2014 Mazda3 Hoovey2411 Car Chat 8 04-09-14 02:24 PM
Corolla vs Focus, Rabbit, Impreza, xD, SX4, Lancer & Astra GS69 Car Chat 13 05-23-08 07:40 PM


Tags
back, backseat, class, comparison, front, interior, leg, legroom, lexus, mercedes, rear, room, sc, seat, sucks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:35 PM.


Copyright © 2000-2016 Internet Brands, Inc. All Rights Reserved