Financial benefits of owning a GS...
#16
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NE
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NE
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
True. If finances were the only factor, something like a Corolla would be perfect. For me, I'd rather spend a small amount more and get something with the comfort and style of a GS.
#21
Lead Lap
iTrader: (6)
A car may or may not be an asset. If you think some cars aren't assets, just ask Jay Leno. He's got a garage full of "non-assets".
There are a lot of factors that go into that determination. For most people, it is not an asset. But for some it is. At some point, after a car's value has reached a certain low point, if it is well maintained, its value will begin to increase as it ages. Generally because there will be fewer and fewer of that model in existence. A possession that increases in net value is an asset.
Its not a cut and dried questioned.
There are a lot of factors that go into that determination. For most people, it is not an asset. But for some it is. At some point, after a car's value has reached a certain low point, if it is well maintained, its value will begin to increase as it ages. Generally because there will be fewer and fewer of that model in existence. A possession that increases in net value is an asset.
Its not a cut and dried questioned.
#22
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
I wouldn't.... In the capitalstic society we live in, these "new" cars with these "warranties" were only made to MESS UP..... NONE of these new PLASTIC cars on the road will last longer then a 2GS model... They're ALL made to keep you coming back to the dealer to repair CHEAPLY made things with your so called "warranty" that always manages to exclude a small cost that will eventually come out YOUR POCKET... Ppl who have faith in these new age cars ARE VERY WRONG..... And I'm a 21 year old saying this... I've worked on them all with my pops... They truly JUST DONT MAKE THEM like they use to. Every year it's more trash... It's Quantity over Quality that's running these car companies nowadays... Maybe with a few exception of HIGHLY EXPENSIVE cars, don't expect too much LONG LASTING quality from these new age cars.
Our cars have VVT-i and a complex drive-by-wire throttle body setup. Those two things, alone, would cause anyone who likes reliability and simplicity to balk.
I'm not saying that our cars are not reliable. They are. But when it comes to "they don't make them like they used to" - I don't think 2GS owners have a soapbox to stand on here. If anything, we're seeing an increase in engineering quality and reliability in modern cars of the last 2 or 3 years.
#24
I thought this thread was about the financial benefits of owning a reliable car and driving it for many years to reap the benefits from not having to buy a new car.
I cant truly make out if this is a GS appreciation thread or you are actually trying to say there are actual financial benefits of owning a GS because a V6 or a V8 is not exactly saving anybody's money in any way. I also believe there are other luxury cars that are in the same competitive price range as our GS so personally I dont think Im getting any financial benefits from driving the GS. Im driving it because I really like the car and if I were to factor in financial benefits while keeping style and comfort, there are many other cars I can choose from.
But style and comfort is objective, so to each their own I guess.
Just my two cents, not trying to say whats right or wrong.
#25
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NE
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I thought this thread was about the financial benefits of owning a reliable car and driving it for many years to reap the benefits from not having to buy a new car.
I cant truly make out if this is a GS appreciation thread or you are actually trying to say there are actual financial benefits of owning a GS because a V6 or a V8 is not exactly saving anybody's money in any way. I also believe there are other luxury cars that are in the same competitive price range as our GS so personally I dont think Im getting any financial benefits from driving the GS. Im driving it because I really like the car and if I were to factor in financial benefits while keeping style and comfort, there are many other cars I can choose from.
But style and comfort is objective, so to each their own I guess.
Just my two cents, not trying to say whats right or wrong.
I cant truly make out if this is a GS appreciation thread or you are actually trying to say there are actual financial benefits of owning a GS because a V6 or a V8 is not exactly saving anybody's money in any way. I also believe there are other luxury cars that are in the same competitive price range as our GS so personally I dont think Im getting any financial benefits from driving the GS. Im driving it because I really like the car and if I were to factor in financial benefits while keeping style and comfort, there are many other cars I can choose from.
But style and comfort is objective, so to each their own I guess.
Just my two cents, not trying to say whats right or wrong.
I disagree with the whole "gas mileage" point when comparing to new cars because the average new car will set you back around $25k (on average). Sure you will get better gas mileage than a second generation GS; however not to the tune of $15k over the life of the car (unless you kept that same car for 20 years which is unlikely). That also is not factoring in depreciation which is another cost that hits new car buyers in a big way.
Frankly I'm a little surprised at how this thread was to perceived to be something it isn't. But maybe that is my fault for not being more clear. I hope that helps clarify things.
#27
I do understand and agree with you on this one
and regarding your second paragraph
I disagree with the whole "gas mileage" point when comparing to new cars because the average new car will set you back around $25k (on average). Sure you will get better gas mileage than a second generation GS; however not to the tune of $15k over the life of the car (unless you kept that same car for 20 years which is unlikely). That also is not factoring in depreciation which is another cost that hits new car buyers in a big way.
I bring gas mileage to this discussion because it really makes our car not 'cheap' to drive. Parts and labour is cheaper than other luxury brands such as Mercedes and BMW, but I believe it is not the cheapest and gas mileage definitely brings everything down when we look at our GS from a financial standpoint. You dont have to agree with me on this but this is how I see it.
Frankly I'm a little surprised at how this thread was to perceived to be something it isn't. But maybe that is my fault for not being more clear. I hope that helps clarify things
#28
Not confused, just a different opinion. Not everyone who has a GS (or any car for that matter) uses it for DD, just as not every car that is owned is a collectable. There is a lot of grey in between. Nevertheless, any well cared for car, DD or not, will only go down so far in value before it starts to increase in value with age.
#29
Pole Position
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NE
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Neosakai,
I agree that there are other cars out there that may provide a great financial benefit than the 2nd generation GS. I only used the GS as an example because this is a 2nd generation GS forum. That makes a lot of sense to me and I didn't think I needed to provide the disclaimer that there are other cars that could be better. I mean that is pretty common sense. I mean its cool that you have another car that may do better, but how am I supposed to account for that before I made my initial post? Seems a bit unreasonable to be sensitive about something like that :-)
Was just commenting that 2nd generation GS is a lot of car for the money and allows you to drive a stylish and reliable car for not a ton of money. While other "economy style cars" will provide a better return on investment there are intangible benefits in my opinion with the GS that outweigh that. But that is just me.
I agree that there are other cars out there that may provide a great financial benefit than the 2nd generation GS. I only used the GS as an example because this is a 2nd generation GS forum. That makes a lot of sense to me and I didn't think I needed to provide the disclaimer that there are other cars that could be better. I mean that is pretty common sense. I mean its cool that you have another car that may do better, but how am I supposed to account for that before I made my initial post? Seems a bit unreasonable to be sensitive about something like that :-)
Was just commenting that 2nd generation GS is a lot of car for the money and allows you to drive a stylish and reliable car for not a ton of money. While other "economy style cars" will provide a better return on investment there are intangible benefits in my opinion with the GS that outweigh that. But that is just me.
#30
Neosakai,
I agree that there are other cars out there that may provide a great financial benefit than the 2nd generation GS. I only used the GS as an example because this is a 2nd generation GS forum. That makes a lot of sense to me and I didn't think I needed to provide the disclaimer that there are other cars that could be better. I mean that is pretty common sense. I mean its cool that you have another car that may do better, but how am I supposed to account for that before I made my initial post? Seems a bit unreasonable to be sensitive about something like that :-)
Was just commenting that 2nd generation GS is a lot of car for the money and allows you to drive a stylish and reliable car for not a ton of money. While other "economy style cars" will provide a better return on investment there are intangible benefits in my opinion with the GS that outweigh that. But that is just me.
I agree that there are other cars out there that may provide a great financial benefit than the 2nd generation GS. I only used the GS as an example because this is a 2nd generation GS forum. That makes a lot of sense to me and I didn't think I needed to provide the disclaimer that there are other cars that could be better. I mean that is pretty common sense. I mean its cool that you have another car that may do better, but how am I supposed to account for that before I made my initial post? Seems a bit unreasonable to be sensitive about something like that :-)
Was just commenting that 2nd generation GS is a lot of car for the money and allows you to drive a stylish and reliable car for not a ton of money. While other "economy style cars" will provide a better return on investment there are intangible benefits in my opinion with the GS that outweigh that. But that is just me.
I also see intangible benefits to having our GS and that is also why Im driving it, Im sure we can agree on that. I was simply just not quite agreeing with seeing financial benefits with the GS but that is just based on my experiences so don't let my words get to ya