GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020) Discussion about the 2013 and up GS models

Rc f

Old 11-15-14, 07:51 PM
  #46  
tknx
Pole Position
 
tknx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: California
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Ice350
I still can't understand why you guys are making so many negative comments about something that's not for you. You don't understand coupes.
Coupe lovers don't care about rear seat room.
Coupe lovers don't care about practicality.
It's about that long hood and short rear deck. It's about that long front door making it easy to get in and out of. It's about the styling. It's about the cool factor. It's about the handling performance. It's about the sexy.
You like big sedans, that's fine. But why rag on something that's not your thing.
Crap interiors are crap interiors. You are paying GS+ money for an IS interior.

Heavy cars also also have their limitations. A GTR or Vette will destroy it, a Cayman will be more fun to drive, and so on....

And if you are cross-shopping an M4 - then it has more interior space, lighter weight, and less compromises while being as good or better. So again the RC seems to lose.

So if you are all show, which it sounds like you are, then maybe the RC is worth it. But a lot of people are going to look at you and think "sucker, I would have gotten a Cayman instead"
tknx is offline  
Old 11-15-14, 08:56 PM
  #47  
dchar
Lexus Champion
 
dchar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,954
Received 223 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ice350
I still can't understand why you guys are making so many negative comments about something that's not for you. You don't understand coupes.
Coupe lovers don't care about rear seat room.
Coupe lovers don't care about practicality.
It's about that long hood and short rear deck. It's about that long front door making it easy to get in and out of. It's about the styling. It's about the cool factor. It's about the handling performance. It's about the sexy.
You like big sedans, that's fine. But why rag on something that's not your thing.
Well if you think "coupe lovers" don't care about practicality or rear seat room, then why even bother looking at the RC? Why not get something that's 2 doors with only 2 seats (I.e., Cayman, Corvette, F-type, Evora). Way sexier, way cooler, better handling, more performance, less weight.

RC is more of a GT car, but it doesn't have the space or luxury to be a good one. If I was in the market for a 4-seat coupe, I would probably pick the M4 over the RCF because it handles better, has a roomier interior, and I can use it more everyday. That's what these cars are for...daily drivers!

Lexus went the wrong way by making the interior so small and basing it on the IS. This car would've been more competitive if the interior was better packaged and the car was much lighter (hint: use aluminum). The RCF could've been a home run for Lexus if they made it as light (or lighter) than the M4. It might be enough to to excuse the interior. They did one thing right though, and that's putting that awesome V8.
dchar is offline  
Old 11-16-14, 08:40 AM
  #48  
coach1
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
coach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 306
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I do think the RC-F will be a home run for Lexus.....for those who want a sport coupe. Not all of us are looking for that. I wouldn't give two cents for a M4 BMW even if it did out perform the Lexus because, the only time it can, is when it isn't in the shop....same goes for it's German counter parts....Mercedes & Audi. I don't like hearing Lexus Dealerships are taking advantage of the new release. That will be short lived as soon as the pipeline is filled with inventory. The sound of the new 5.0L V8 is exciting.
I didn't start this thread to begin a coupe war (who is the best), but simply to get impressions from those who have seen the new RC-F and how it compares to other Lexus models.
coach1 is offline  
Old 11-16-14, 12:51 PM
  #49  
damtachoa
Pole Position
 
damtachoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't know why people keep comparing RC with M4 when M4 $80K and RC $53K. Is the engine of M4 really that worth $27K different?
damtachoa is offline  
Old 11-16-14, 01:47 PM
  #50  
ohsown
Rookie
 
ohsown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ontario
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Hey, I'm not knocking it, I like it but its too small for me shoulder to shoulder. The IS350 got me in the showroom when the Mercedes coupe was what got me going. Bring on a GS coupe and I'm your Huckleberry! A little more low end grunt wouldn't hurt while you're at it.
ohsown is offline  
Old 11-16-14, 02:03 PM
  #51  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,056
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by damtachoa
I don't know why people keep comparing RC with M4 when M4 $80K and RC $53K. Is the engine of M4 really that worth $27K different?
RCF and M4 cost about the same. (65k-80k depending on options)

RC350 competes with 428i/435i
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 11-16-14, 04:28 PM
  #52  
Seize
Loves Snickerdoodles!
 
Seize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 19,736
Received 68 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Guys, this is the 4GS forum. If you guys would like to continue your discussion about the RC-F then please do so in it's own forum.

https://www.clublexus.com/forums/rc-f-259/
Seize is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chris8152
RC F (2015-present)
5
03-06-15 03:43 PM
UnSub
SC430 - 2nd Gen (2001-2010)
5
10-10-11 05:57 AM
x10civ
RX - 3rd Gen (2010-2015)
6
08-22-11 11:18 AM
IsdiorFlow
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
29
12-11-10 03:37 PM
C5Longhorn
IS - 2nd Gen (2006-2013)
63
06-12-08 10:47 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Rc f



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:03 AM.