GS - 4th Gen (2013-2020) Discussion about the 2013 and up GS models

If the GS is so good, why are sales low?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-14, 12:02 PM
  #31  
mrphelps01
Driver School Candidate
 
mrphelps01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: md
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW13GS
But "where is" Lexus? They're selling better than ever...they may not appeal to you, but they appeal to nearly 300,000 people every year. When you say "put them where they are" you imply failure when in fact what we have is huge success,

Acura does not have any level of success as a brand. VERY different.



I have three coworkers that had BMW 5 series, they all had reliability problems...I told them all to get a Lexus. They all got ES350s...and none of them understood why I was surprised they had chosen the ES, or why I considered that a "downgrade". They aren't enthusiast buyers, most people aren't. Their BMW 5 series were transportation, and their Lexus ES are transportation. One of these was a late 50s woman, one an early 60s man, and one a mid 50s man. All three MUCH prefer their ESs.

Two of the three didn't even know that the 5 Series is RWD and the ES is FWD. One thought that was great because it would be better in the snow. Their low end 5 series were in the mid/upper $40ks, their loaded ES350s were in the mid/upper $40ks. To them...even swap. They didn't even know there was such a thing as a GS.

These buyers aren't even shown the GS in a Lexus showroom...they are directed right towards an ES. In a BMW or MB showroom they are sold 5's and E's because the 3's and C's are too small.

As for the GS, the GS and IS are built on the same platform. The GS and IS both sell on target and well here and elsewhere. The GS isn't going anywhere.
Whoa! Easy on us mid-50's guys. I'm a car enthusiast. In fact, I'd still drive a manual if it didn't bother my hip! Haha.
Old 04-11-14, 12:03 PM
  #32  
5PM
Driver
 
5PM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: CA
Posts: 185
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by isoh99
Lexus needs to fire their whole exterior design team. I mean really....
Yeah, it's problematic at best. They've gone from oatmeal bland to…medium weird without a stop. The looks of my GS have grown on me tremendously, but it really is too aggressive for the mass audience. They should hire the Italians.
Old 04-11-14, 12:16 PM
  #33  
jkeller
Advanced
 
jkeller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 734
Received 74 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrphelps01
Whoa! Easy on us mid-50's guys. I'm a car enthusiast. In fact, I'd still drive a manual if it didn't bother my hip! Haha.
LOL, I'm knocking on door #50 myself. But I would not buy another manual car again. It's not like it was when I was learning to drive, 3 speed auto or 5 speed manny. Today there is no point to rowing the gears yourself, 6 7 8 or 9 speed automatics do a better job for fuel economy and acceleration.
Old 04-11-14, 12:35 PM
  #34  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,620
Received 2,521 Likes on 1,819 Posts
Default

I think their designers are doing just fine. They've said all along, its not going to be for everybody and they're okay with that. If the styling isn't for you, plenty of other cars you can buy.

Originally Posted by mrphelps01
Whoa! Easy on us mid-50's guys. I'm a car enthusiast. In fact, I'd still drive a manual if it didn't bother my hip! Haha.
Haha, nothing against you mid 50's guys! Just offering demographics of these three specific people.
Old 04-11-14, 12:54 PM
  #35  
jjscsix
Racer
 
jjscsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,340
Received 69 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW13GS
But "where is" Lexus? They're selling better than ever...they may not appeal to you, but they appeal to nearly 300,000 people every year. When you say "put them where they are" you imply failure when in fact what we have is huge success,

Acura does not have any level of success as a brand. VERY different.



I have three coworkers that had BMW 5 series, they all had reliability problems...I told them all to get a Lexus. They all got ES350s...and none of them understood why I was surprised they had chosen the ES, or why I considered that a "downgrade". They aren't enthusiast buyers, most people aren't. Their BMW 5 series were transportation, and their Lexus ES are transportation. One of these was a late 50s woman, one an early 60s man, and one a mid 50s man. All three MUCH prefer their ESs.

Two of the three didn't even know that the 5 Series is RWD and the ES is FWD. One thought that was great because it would be better in the snow. Their low end 5 series were in the mid/upper $40ks, their loaded ES350s were in the mid/upper $40ks. To them...even swap. They didn't even know there was such a thing as a GS.

These buyers aren't even shown the GS in a Lexus showroom...they are directed right towards an ES. In a BMW or MB showroom they are sold 5's and E's because the 3's and C's are too small.

As for the GS, the GS and IS are built on the same platform. The GS and IS both sell on target and well here and elsewhere. The GS isn't going anywhere.
First of all, look at my signature - I just bought a 2014 GS. And I have a BMW 550.

Yes, people traded BMW 5's for ES's. Read my post again. What I said is that people trade down for different reasons. If you don't think an Acura is in the same class as a Lexus, then how can you think an ES is in the same class as a 5 series? As I said, just because someone trades one for the other doesn't make them in the same class. We just traded a 2012 Acura TL SH-AWD for our GS. Does that make them same class competitors?

Acura damn sure did have success as a brand in the late 80s and early 90s. I've been a huge car nut since the mid 60's. I saw it and it was real. If you don't believe me, take a look at this from Wikipedia….
In 1987, Acura's first full year of sales, they sold 109,000 cars with the flagship Legend sedan accounting for 55,000 sales and the rest were of the smaller Integra. By 1990, Acura was selling 138,000 vehicles, including 54,000 Legends, compared to Mercedes-Benz's 78,000 cars and 64,000 each for BMW and Lexus.[4]
I stand corrected on the GS platform - thanks for pointing out that it shares with the IS. My bad.

Last edited by jjscsix; 04-11-14 at 01:02 PM.
Old 04-11-14, 01:47 PM
  #36  
keyframe13
Lexus Test Driver
 
keyframe13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 815
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jjscsix
I have owned a number of Japanese cars, and my BMW 550 is my first German. First a disclaimer, the main reason I got a BMW is because they offer a 400 hp engine and Lexus did not (I had a 2010 GS before the BMW). So here my opinion on the reasons why…

>BMW (and other Germans) have a "snob" appeal that many folks are looking for.

>The Germans cover a lot more ground with the same car. A 5 series starts with a 240 hp 4 cylinder (that feels as fast as a GS btw), 300 hp 6, 445 hp V8, Diesel, and 560 hp M. They also offer a very wide range of options and features that are not available on a GS AND you can actually order one the way you want it.

>The biggest reason IMHO is that Lexus and Acura both came out of the gate with a bang 25 years ago and were very well received. I know some wealthy folks who traded S Class M-Bs and 7 series BMW's for Lexus LS400s. But sadly, the Japanese became very conservative and complacent - like a basketball team with a 10 point lead comes out after half time and forgets that the opponent regrouped. The LS460 has been sitting on 380 hp for years, the GS on 303/306 hp for years, and they have been very conservative in styling and coming out with variations as pointed out above.

Lexus and Acura build fine cars, but not terribly interesting cars and they are now having to go through the process of reversing a perception - which takes time.
This right here it's a fantastic post. That's exactly what I feel especially when The new generation came with the same super old engines. I cannot recall any manufacture to carry on engines for so many years. Lexus is known for reliability?! Hack yes, but that only because they've been keeping those engines for so long. If BMW would sell you today the same engine as in 2006 be sure was very reliable..But people want better gas mileage and performance.. those I4 are doing a great job. those V8, v10 are doing a great job. Lexus needs to stop playing save. Everyone is expecting new and more engines option and that cannot come fast enough.
I think Lexus is doing a poor decision also not to bring IS300h in US or put that engine on a GS.
IMO also GS was always bald and they don;t offer many options the germans do.
At that price tag you need to impress with things you cannot find in an IS or ES.
Old 04-11-14, 06:45 PM
  #37  
dseag2
Lexus Champion
 
dseag2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 4,662
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GSthe4th
I was always under the impression once done with school I would own a BMW or Audi, that was purely based on aesthetics, as the performance was inferred. Their respective badges meant something to me, so I thought. But in late 2011 I caught wind of the GS F sport. I was kind of hooked. I still remember awaiting and watching the Super Bowl commercial, and when I saw it, told my wife that was it. We had a wedding planned for May 2012, so it wasnt a great time to make such a purchase according to my wife. A month and a half later, I surprised her after lunch with a Sunday trip to Lexus. I won that battle. And my car's exterior reflects some of my past obsessions with the German aesthetics. But I have the reliability of the Toyota brand, and a car that has proven itself against the competition. An all around beauty that you don't see all over the road like the 5 series, E350 and less commonly the A6.. And with the direction of Lexus, particularly the "F," I am glad to have found a home. And has anyone seen the Lexus ad blitz on NFL network lately? Exactly as you mention above Hoovey, targeting to the "younger" crowd.
Very well said. I always thought I wanted a BMW because they were the ultimate "Yuppie" cars in the 80's. When I was finally old enough to buy one, I bought an '01 330ci Coupe. The car was fun to drive and sweet looking, but things like the screeching radio that turned up automatically as speed increased (salesman discouraged me from getting Harmon Kardon), door switches on the console and a spoiler that fell off the car while driving made me trade it after 8 months. I traded it for a GS300 that I kept for some time. Since then, I've owned an Audi A5 and 2 Audi S5 Cabriolets, but I went back to Lexus because of the GS F Sport. I am totally satisfied knowing I have tried the German brands and am driving a car that betters them in many respects (like actually more fun to drive) and will still have that great Lexus reliability.
Old 04-11-14, 06:51 PM
  #38  
dseag2
Lexus Champion
 
dseag2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 4,662
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 5PM
Yeah, it's problematic at best. They've gone from oatmeal bland to…medium weird without a stop. The looks of my GS have grown on me tremendously, but it really is too aggressive for the mass audience. They should hire the Italians.
Just not the ones who designed the new Maserati Ghibli.
Old 04-11-14, 07:37 PM
  #39  
HKT
Driver School Candidate
 
HKT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ma
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default I am with you 100%

Originally Posted by puckhead85
Is it weird that I like it low. it makes me feel different that it's a car you don't see often. I see maybe a few each day compared to the 5, 6 and ES....
Old 04-11-14, 07:43 PM
  #40  
Rexus300
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (1)
 
Rexus300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Yeah, I see too many BMW 5s like Camrys around my area. Luckily my car is rare and a cool sighting Woo hoo!
Old 04-11-14, 07:54 PM
  #41  
LexFather
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I guess everyone missed the post that the GS never sold better worldwide last year?

I'm not sure how else to say it but the GS not any other car is going to sell like a 5 or E. So just stop giving the GS this ridiculous comparison. The GS is not a volume car and Lexus has an ES in the USA that changes things compared to the Germans here.

The 5 and E are crucial to those brands success. They are bread and butter. Would Lexus like to see 200,000 worldwide? I'm sure but it would take serious changes that I don't see happening anytime soon.

My take is that the advertising and marketing could also be a lot better. There needs to be more awareness of this car since most that have tried it seek to love it.

The other issue is you have salespeople that just defer to an ES to sell and not the GS. Sure many have heard "oh the ES is bigger and Cheaper". To most people that rings a bell in the head.

We have had this kind is thread for over decade lol.


Originally Posted by jjscsix
I 6, 445 hp V8, Diesel,ut above.

Lexus and Acura build fine cars, but not terribly interesting cars and they are now having to go through the process of reversing a perception - which takes time.
Lexus and Acura should never be mentioned in the same breathe. Apples to oranges. Acura is also pretty much an America brand with a Japanese badge.

Acura can't figure out how to sell one sedan lol.
Old 04-11-14, 09:32 PM
  #42  
GSthe4th
Pole Position
iTrader: (1)
 
GSthe4th's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Ca
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dseag2
Very well said. I always thought I wanted a BMW because they were the ultimate "Yuppie" cars in the 80's. When I was finally old enough to buy one, I bought an '01 330ci Coupe. The car was fun to drive and sweet looking, but things like the screeching radio that turned up automatically as speed increased (salesman discouraged me from getting Harmon Kardon), door switches on the console and a spoiler that fell off the car while driving made me trade it after 8 months. I traded it for a GS300 that I kept for some time. Since then, I've owned an Audi A5 and 2 Audi S5 Cabriolets, but I went back to Lexus because of the GS F Sport. I am totally satisfied knowing I have tried the German brands and am driving a car that betters them in many respects (like actually more fun to drive) and will still have that great Lexus reliability.
Thank you sir. Unlike you, I haven't tasted what the Germans have to offer, on any level. That is kind of disappointing and I am envious, but if lucky enough I have years of owning cars ahead. I do know my next car will be a Lexus as well. After that...well that's a topic for the next decade.
Old 04-12-14, 05:43 PM
  #43  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,620
Received 2,521 Likes on 1,819 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jjscsix
First of all, look at my signature - I just bought a 2014 GS. And I have a BMW 550.
Your sig says you have a Lexus, not that it's a GS.

Yes, people traded BMW 5's for ES's. Read my post again. What I said is that people trade down for different reasons. If you don't think an Acura is in the same class as a Lexus, then how can you think an ES is in the same class as a 5 series? As I said, just because someone trades one for the other doesn't make them in the same class. We just traded a 2012 Acura TL SH-AWD for our GS. Does that make them same class competitors?
You're misunderstanding me. I am not talking about me, *i* know the ES and the 5 are not comparable cars. I'm telling you what these three people I know did and think. They do not believe they traded down, they believe they made a lateral move from their 5 Series to the ES. To them their low end 5 Series cost about what their higher optioned ES's cost, so to them they feel like they bought a similar car just from Lexus. Im not saying they are right, I'm just relaying their belief. My point is these people are not enthusiasts, they bought the 5 Series because it's a mid sized BMW...and to them the ES is similar. That's why the GS doesn't sell at the same volume, because non enthusiast buyers (most) buy the ES. If the ES didn't exist, GS sales would be far stronger.

Acura damn sure did have success as a brand in the late 80s and early 90s. I've been a huge car nut since the mid 60's. I saw it and it was real. If you don't believe me, take a look at this from Wikipedia….
Acura absolutely had success...with the Legend and the Integra. The brand as a whole isn't nearly as successful as Lexus, they made a lot of poor choices along the way and now they're a very disappointing marque IMHO.

At that price tag you need to impress with things you cannot find in an IS or ES.
All you have to do is sit in and drive the GS to see what you cannot find in an IS or ES. I came from the ES, and the GS is better in every way but rear space. Much better interior, much better chassis, driving dynamics, performance. The IS is smaller, less sophisticated feeling.

What technology do the Germans have in a typical build the GS doesn't have? Nothing. True, you can get more...but the 5 series or E the typical buyer buys off the lot actually has less tech features than the typical GS.

Last edited by SW17LS; 04-12-14 at 06:20 PM.
Old 04-12-14, 07:01 PM
  #44  
jjscsix
Racer
 
jjscsix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,340
Received 69 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW13GS
Your sig says you have a Lexus, not that it's a GS.



You're misunderstanding me. I am not talking about me, *i* know the ES and the 5 are not comparable cars. I'm telling you what these three people I know did and think. They do not believe they traded down, they believe they made a lateral move from their 5 Series to the ES. To them their low end 5 Series cost about what their higher optioned ES's cost, so to them they feel like they bought a similar car just from Lexus. Im not saying they are right, I'm just relaying their belief. My point is these people are not enthusiasts, they bought the 5 Series because it's a mid sized BMW...and to them the ES is similar. That's why the GS doesn't sell at the same volume, because non enthusiast buyers (most) buy the ES. If the ES didn't exist, GS sales would be far stronger.



Acura absolutely had success...with the Legend and the Integra. The brand as a whole isn't nearly as successful as Lexus, they made a lot of poor choices along the way and now they're a very disappointing marque IMHO.



All you have to do is sit in and drive the GS to see what you cannot find in an IS or ES. I came from the ES, and the GS is better in every way but rear space. Much better interior, much better chassis, driving dynamics, performance. The IS is smaller, less sophisticated feeling.

What technology do the Germans have in a typical build the GS doesn't have? Nothing. True, you can get more...but the 5 series or E the typical buyer buys off the lot actually has less tech features than the typical GS.
You are really hard to debate with because you are not consistent. And yes, I forgot to say that our Lexus is a GS, But I don't see where that changes the meaning of anything I said. It the second GS I have owned. I have also owned four Acuras and about 54 other four wheel vehicles.
Old 04-12-14, 07:24 PM
  #45  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,620
Received 2,521 Likes on 1,819 Posts
Default

Not sure where I haven't been consistent...my feeling as to why the GS doesn't sell in volumes like the other cars in the segment is because non-enthusiast buyers buy the ES instead of the GS. Those buyers buy lightly optioned, small engined 5 series, E Classes, A6 etc in those brands.

Last edited by SW17LS; 04-12-14 at 07:56 PM.


Quick Reply: If the GS is so good, why are sales low?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:27 AM.