Battle of the Big 3! GS series vs 5 series vs E class
#31
Lexus Connoisseur
Originally Posted by chiawei
That's how much it cost in SF Bay area. A simple 5k miles service i actually understated as it was close to $140. The toyota dealer charged close to $100 for 5k service, (i just had 20k miles service on the sienna done at fremont toyota about 2 to 3months ago).
You wish this is inflated. But this is how much dealers in silicon valley charges.
You wish this is inflated. But this is how much dealers in silicon valley charges.
#32
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by flipside909
Unfortunately you live in a place where cost of living goes along with the income out there, so yes, in comparison to the rest of California, it is inflated. I should know this, I grew up in the Bay Area. 5k service here in SoCal is less than $80 w/tax and all the environmental fees and that's for Lexus. Toyota's services are way less. I take it the only place you trust to take your vehicle for repairs is the dealership. A wise consumer always shops for the best price for services, even if you have to drive a little bit further. $100 for a 5k service at Fremont Toyota? Hook line and sinker...and the dealership service dept. wins.
#33
Lexus Test Driver
Hey West Coast, you're getting a bargain on service
You can pretty much add a hundred dollars to those prices here in the Eastern Region! If you are a happy camper at the end of the day then I guess it's worth it. BMW is in for service twice as often as a Lexus and usually for a repair not maintenance so what is your time and effort worth even if the servicing is under warranty? I would agree with Flipside that if you can find a good reliable shop to service your car put your favorite tech on your Christmas card list. A good service consultant can make your day a lot easier. Those Lexus loaner cars cost about $35,000 each and they are a nice perk too. The service dept. is the toughest job in the dealership and is highly stressful. If there is a grey area such as your car has just gone out of warranty and you need something replaced then a good service history is your best ally and can lead to a "goodwill" coverage of the repair. Just ask nicely....
#34
Lexus Connoisseur
Yeah I guess we're lucky here in SoCal. Considering we are car culture capital of the world, service departments here thrive on the many cars that clog all of our freeways. Lucky for us our Lexus dealers don't charge us an arm and a leg for the same services in other parts of the country. We're even lucky to have places like Luxury Motorworks who offer the same basic 5k dealership service for only $55. And this using Toyota Genuine Parts and techs that have years of Lexus service department experience.
#35
Originally Posted by flipside909
Unfortunately you live in a place where cost of living goes along with the income out there, so yes, in comparison to the rest of California, it is inflated. I should know this, I grew up in the Bay Area. 5k service here in SoCal is less than $80 w/tax and all the environmental fees and that's for Lexus. Toyota's services are way less. I take it the only place you trust to take your vehicle for repairs is the dealership. A wise consumer always shops for the best price for services, even if you have to drive a little bit further. $100 for a 5k service at Fremont Toyota? Hook line and sinker...and the dealership service dept. wins.
The lexus dealer in fremont's service department is 24 hours operation (except on weekends). Nothing beats that. The toyota also has door open late (even though they do not advertise it).
The dealer is about 5 minutes from my house close to the mountain. It's close. I don't have the time to drive around for better service price. In addition, all dealers in the bay area charges about the same. Unless you are going to drive at least an hour away, you have no choices.
#36
Lexus Connoisseur
You pay a price for convenience unfortunately. Lexus and Toyotas are still relatively cheap to maintain in the long run.
#37
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2006 530i vs 2006 GS300 = 2006 530i
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS430 = Still Deciding
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS450 = 2006 GS450 (Not Available yet)
2006 550i vs. 2006 GS450 = Unknown
My decision for my next car later this year has pretty much come down to the BMW 5 Series (Current 2001 530i owner) and the Lexus GS (Fomer 2001 GS430 owner).
Since the BMW 530i loaded is in the GS430 price range, it is a better comparision for what I can get for the money I am able to spend.
I love the new 2006 GS430, but hesistant to buy it later this year and then a couple of months later the GS450 becomes available.
Is a 300HP V8 good enough for now? Sure it is! Is a proported 325+HP V8 in early Spring 2006 worth the wait for the 2007 MY, YES IT IS - if you can wait.
Eventhough the 2006 will have the same look as the 2007, that upgraded V8 engine and the rebadging to a GS450 is a world of difference to me.
The decision would be a no brainer if a 2006 GS450 were possible and available this year. A GS450 if available now would have sold even more units than the current GS430.
This is a tough one!
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS430 = Still Deciding
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS450 = 2006 GS450 (Not Available yet)
2006 550i vs. 2006 GS450 = Unknown
My decision for my next car later this year has pretty much come down to the BMW 5 Series (Current 2001 530i owner) and the Lexus GS (Fomer 2001 GS430 owner).
Since the BMW 530i loaded is in the GS430 price range, it is a better comparision for what I can get for the money I am able to spend.
I love the new 2006 GS430, but hesistant to buy it later this year and then a couple of months later the GS450 becomes available.
Is a 300HP V8 good enough for now? Sure it is! Is a proported 325+HP V8 in early Spring 2006 worth the wait for the 2007 MY, YES IT IS - if you can wait.
Eventhough the 2006 will have the same look as the 2007, that upgraded V8 engine and the rebadging to a GS450 is a world of difference to me.
The decision would be a no brainer if a 2006 GS450 were possible and available this year. A GS450 if available now would have sold even more units than the current GS430.
This is a tough one!
#38
Originally Posted by flipside909
You pay a price for convenience unfortunately. Lexus and Toyotas are still relatively cheap to maintain in the long run.
#39
Originally Posted by lexguynj
2006 530i vs 2006 GS300 = 2006 530i
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS430 = Still Deciding
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS450 = 2006 GS450 (Not Available yet)
2006 550i vs. 2006 GS450 = Unknown
My decision for my next car later this year has pretty much come down to the BMW 5 Series (Current 2001 530i owner) and the Lexus GS (Fomer 2001 GS430 owner).
Since the BMW 530i loaded is in the GS430 price range, it is a better comparision for what I can get for the money I am able to spend.
I love the new 2006 GS430, but hesistant to buy it later this year and then a couple of months later the GS450 becomes available.
Is a 300HP V8 good enough for now? Sure it is! Is a proported 325+HP V8 in early Spring 2006 worth the wait for the 2007 MY, YES IT IS - if you can wait.
Eventhough the 2006 will have the same look as the 2007, that upgraded V8 engine and the rebadging to a GS450 is a world of difference to me.
The decision would be a no brainer if a 2006 GS450 were possible and available this year. A GS450 if available now would have sold even more units than the current GS430.
This is a tough one!
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS430 = Still Deciding
2006 530i vs. 2006 GS450 = 2006 GS450 (Not Available yet)
2006 550i vs. 2006 GS450 = Unknown
My decision for my next car later this year has pretty much come down to the BMW 5 Series (Current 2001 530i owner) and the Lexus GS (Fomer 2001 GS430 owner).
Since the BMW 530i loaded is in the GS430 price range, it is a better comparision for what I can get for the money I am able to spend.
I love the new 2006 GS430, but hesistant to buy it later this year and then a couple of months later the GS450 becomes available.
Is a 300HP V8 good enough for now? Sure it is! Is a proported 325+HP V8 in early Spring 2006 worth the wait for the 2007 MY, YES IT IS - if you can wait.
Eventhough the 2006 will have the same look as the 2007, that upgraded V8 engine and the rebadging to a GS450 is a world of difference to me.
The decision would be a no brainer if a 2006 GS450 were possible and available this year. A GS450 if available now would have sold even more units than the current GS430.
This is a tough one!
BTW, given the fact that BMW is blowing the 545i out of the door with great incentive. Why not buy a 545i and forget about comparing. The 545i would probably be faster than GS450H. Plus you don't need to worry about battery being recharged (given the fact you probably drive the car hard, chances are your battery will not be charged fully in majority of the time).
3 of my buddies just did ED on 3 545i 2 weeks ago.
#41
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
March Sales
5 = 3,949
E = 3,608
GS = 3,209
STS = 2,954
M = 2,253
A6 = 1,681
RL = 1,376
I wonder if the GS can catch up with the E for 2nd? Maybe even the 5 for 1st place in the segment? It really is not far off.
5 = 3,949
E = 3,608
GS = 3,209
STS = 2,954
M = 2,253
A6 = 1,681
RL = 1,376
I wonder if the GS can catch up with the E for 2nd? Maybe even the 5 for 1st place in the segment? It really is not far off.
RL is starting to look like a has been. I wonder if the Automobile win by the A6 will increase sales. They've been pretty subpar thus far.
#42
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: None
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Incendiary
RL is starting to look like a has been. I wonder if the Automobile win by the A6 will increase sales. They've been pretty subpar thus far.
The thing that really hurts RL sales is that it only has one loaded AWD $50,000 version. If Lexus only sold a GS300 AWD with Navi/Levinson and Infiniti only sold an M35x with Tech Package, the sales for those cars would not be impressive either.
There is no way you can have FWD with 300hp, so the RL has to be AWD, but Honda should have made some things options, such as the 5.1 Bose and the Navi. And they stubbornly refuse to develop a V8, so their loss.
Acura should have started the RL at $45,000 MSRP and offered the Navi/Bose 5.1/XM Traffic/XM radio/Onstar as a $4,500 option. Then, people could get this "base" RL on the street for $41,000 with discounts, and I could see a quite a few people opting for the RL at that price. After all, not everyone wants or cares about the stereo or the Navi. I bet more than half of GS300 sales are without the Navi/Levinson package.
#43
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MD
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by jrock65
The RL is a very nice car actually, too bad it's getting overlooked amid the onslaught by the other manufacturers.
The thing that really hurts RL sales is that it only has one loaded AWD $50,000 version. If Lexus only sold a GS300 AWD with Navi/Levinson and Infiniti only sold an M35x with Tech Package, the sales for those cars would not be impressive either.
There is no way you can have FWD with 300hp, so the RL has to be AWD, but Honda should have made some things options, such as the 5.1 Bose and the Navi. And they stubbornly refuse to develop a V8, so their loss.
Acura should have started the RL at $45,000 MSRP and offered the Navi/Bose 5.1/XM Traffic/XM radio/Onstar as a $4,500 option. Then, people could get this "base" RL on the street for $41,000 with discounts, and I could see a quite a few people opting for the RL at that price. After all, not everyone wants or cares about the stereo or the Navi. I bet more than half of GS300 sales are without the Navi/Levinson package.
The thing that really hurts RL sales is that it only has one loaded AWD $50,000 version. If Lexus only sold a GS300 AWD with Navi/Levinson and Infiniti only sold an M35x with Tech Package, the sales for those cars would not be impressive either.
There is no way you can have FWD with 300hp, so the RL has to be AWD, but Honda should have made some things options, such as the 5.1 Bose and the Navi. And they stubbornly refuse to develop a V8, so their loss.
Acura should have started the RL at $45,000 MSRP and offered the Navi/Bose 5.1/XM Traffic/XM radio/Onstar as a $4,500 option. Then, people could get this "base" RL on the street for $41,000 with discounts, and I could see a quite a few people opting for the RL at that price. After all, not everyone wants or cares about the stereo or the Navi. I bet more than half of GS300 sales are without the Navi/Levinson package.
#44
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Incendiary
I agree, I wonder why Honda hasn't realized this yet.
I never expected the RL to be a great seller, I accepted it for what it was not want some want it to be.
#45
Originally Posted by 1SICKLEX
March Sales
5 = 3,949
E = 3,608
GS = 3,209
STS = 2,954
M = 2,253
A6 = 1,681
RL = 1,376
I wonder if the GS can catch up with the E for 2nd? Maybe even the 5 for 1st place in the segment? It really is not far off.
5 = 3,949
E = 3,608
GS = 3,209
STS = 2,954
M = 2,253
A6 = 1,681
RL = 1,376
I wonder if the GS can catch up with the E for 2nd? Maybe even the 5 for 1st place in the segment? It really is not far off.
I dont see what the big hoopla for 530i is, it was significantly slower in any performance measurment than GS430 in CD, so for the same price it doesnt make any sense. It was below average in handling as well among cars tested so buying 530i performance? Hm.
To me 530i is definetly the souless car of the group, no emotion in the design both interior and exterior, typical German coldness and engineering.
All 3 cars represent their marques well, BMW cold, german design and engineering, GS Japanese fashion statement and MB german elegance.