ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012) Discussion topics related to 2007+ ES350

ES350 gasoline

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-15-14, 06:24 PM
  #46  
korlexus
Driver
 
korlexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

According to some automobile experts that I've met,
most of Japanese cars(including lexus/infinit/acura) doesn't require to be filled with 91 octane even though it says on the gas tank. If you put anything below 91 octane on german cars, then you are screwed.
I guess they are right?!
Old 01-15-14, 07:06 PM
  #47  
greenchile
Driver School Candidate
 
greenchile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok, started the test today. Put regular (86) in it. We'll see how it goes over the next couple weeks to see if I need to put the premium (91) in it.
Old 01-16-14, 08:37 PM
  #48  
Rogarven
Rookie
 
Rogarven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 69
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I will post here and the other thread. I filled up tonight with premium and we measured 22.2 MPG with mostly stop and go driving, very little freeway. I am very pleased!! I was also able to get prem. here for $3.29 per gal. so I think it is worth it, at least so far. :-) BTW, I calculated the old fashioned way, pencil and calculator. LOL

Last edited by Rogarven; 01-16-14 at 08:43 PM.
Old 01-17-14, 04:24 AM
  #49  
lgb0250
Intermediate
 
lgb0250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 390
Received 116 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogarven
I will post here and the other thread. I filled up tonight with premium and we measured 22.2 MPG with mostly stop and go driving, very little freeway. I am very pleased!! I was also able to get prem. here for $3.29 per gal. so I think it is worth it, at least so far. :-) BTW, I calculated the old fashioned way, pencil and calculator. LOL
Since you are doing it the manual way it will be interesting to see how close it comes to what the computer says! Good luck
Old 01-17-14, 06:05 AM
  #50  
Rogarven
Rookie
 
Rogarven's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 69
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lgb0250
Since you are doing it the manual way it will be interesting to see how close it comes to what the computer says! Good luck
Really , the computer was very close to what it actually was! I was really impressed as this was better than the Accord V6 we just replaced.
Old 01-17-14, 06:35 AM
  #51  
igzy
Lead Lap
 
igzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ON
Posts: 468
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I too do the manual calculation on every fill up (weekly) and compare it to the car's and they are pretty close...
Old 01-20-14, 09:49 AM
  #52  
christcorp
Pit Crew
 
christcorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 186
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I must be lucky with my computer calculating. I still manually calculate mpg, but on the last 4 fill ups, all in town driving, manual calculations were around 20.28 average and the computer has said 20.3. Pretty close. I'll still do it manually, nut its nice to know its accurate.
Old 01-20-14, 12:35 PM
  #53  
igzy
Lead Lap
 
igzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: ON
Posts: 468
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

My last fill up was 15.6 gallons after 476 miles and the car showed 30.5 mpg same that I worked out on paper
Old 01-28-14, 08:52 AM
  #54  
RainaES350
Rookie
iTrader: (1)
 
RainaES350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Thanks for all the great information here guys, I will start using 87 octane!
Old 01-28-14, 07:16 PM
  #55  
christcorp
Pit Crew
 
christcorp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 186
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RainaES350
Thanks for all the great information here guys, I will start using 87 octane!
As has been said in this, and similar threads. Don't use 87 octane because "some" people here are using 87 octane. You use 87 octane because that is what "YOUR CAR" Likes. And the only way you'll know what your car likes best, is to run a couple tanks of each octane in your car and try and drive similarly. E.g. 2 tanks of 87.... then 2 tanks of 89..... then 2 tanks of 91. Determine how it drives, starts, pickup when flooring it to pass, gas mileage, etc... Your car will tell you what it likes and wants. Not a bunch of anonymous people on the internet. "Myself included". It's only going to cost you a couple of dollars difference to fill up the tank with different grades of gasoline and find out for yourself. Some cars work fine on 85 or 87. Some work better with 89. Some work better with 91. All I'm saying is: "Trust your car...... Not strangers you don't know on the internet". Your car will not lie to you.
Old 01-29-14, 08:01 AM
  #56  
garsarno
Lexus Champion
 
garsarno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Amen to that. had a 2007 Hemi Grand Cherokee. Ran okay on 87, ran poorly on 93 and it loved 89
Old 01-30-14, 12:48 PM
  #57  
RainaES350
Rookie
iTrader: (1)
 
RainaES350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: CA
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by christcorp
As has been said in this, and similar threads. Don't use 87 octane because "some" people here are using 87 octane. You use 87 octane because that is what "YOUR CAR" Likes. And the only way you'll know what your car likes best, is to run a couple tanks of each octane in your car and try and drive similarly. E.g. 2 tanks of 87.... then 2 tanks of 89..... then 2 tanks of 91. Determine how it drives, starts, pickup when flooring it to pass, gas mileage, etc... Your car will tell you what it likes and wants. Not a bunch of anonymous people on the internet. "Myself included". It's only going to cost you a couple of dollars difference to fill up the tank with different grades of gasoline and find out for yourself. Some cars work fine on 85 or 87. Some work better with 89. Some work better with 91. All I'm saying is: "Trust your car...... Not strangers you don't know on the internet". Your car will not lie to you.
Gotcha...will experiment!
Old 02-01-14, 04:30 PM
  #58  
fatbeaver1
Driver School Candidate
 
fatbeaver1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Indiana
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 2008 and use 89 octane. I too was amazed when I first got the car that it would get over 30 mpg on the highway going 70-74 mph. That is actual numbers calculated from filling up with a full tank then figuring how many gallons are left on the next fill up. I find the trip computer is off .5 to 1 mpg from my calcualtions.
Old 02-02-14, 02:26 AM
  #59  
MikePA
Rookie
 
MikePA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: PA
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fatbeaver1
I have a 2008 and use 89 octane. I too was amazed when I first got the car that it would get over 30 mpg on the highway going 70-74 mph. That is actual numbers calculated from filling up with a full tank then figuring how many gallons are left on the next fill up.
Guessing at gallons left in the tank is not used to compute mpg.
Old 02-02-14, 06:59 AM
  #60  
greenchile
Driver School Candidate
 
greenchile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've had some strange results with my 86 vs 91 test so far. I've filled up 3 times now, with 86 octane, when the tank was down to about 1/4 full on the gauge. The 2nd fill up resulted in 24.5 mpg. The third fill up resulted in 25 mpg. being off by 1/2 to 1 mpg is pretty normal for me. What is strange is that I had used 91 octane exclusively since purchasing the car and had repeatedly gotten 22.9 mpg up until putting 86.

I would have expected my fuel economy to either stay the same or decrease, not increase by 1.5 -- 2 mpg. I have not run the fuel economy test long enough to feel good about the results though, just a little intrigued by what I'm seeing so far. I have not been able to detect any pre-ignition pinging using the lower octane. I have noticed that the throttle response is just barely slower than before the switch. I think it's perfectly reasonable that I may just be seeing normal variations in fuel economy based on where I had driven in the week prior, doing more or less city driving than commuting that week than in previous weeks. So I'm probably going to give the 86 octane a couple more fill ups to see where the numbers go and then switch back to 91 to see what numbers I get after the switch.

In case you're wondering about the low octane ratings of 86 and 91, those are the regular and premium ratings in my town, Albuquerque, which sits at 5,000 ft above sea level.


Quick Reply: ES350 gasoline



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:21 AM.