Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

What's The Point Of Owning A 'Luxury' Car Anymore?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-27-16, 03:18 PM
  #91  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,768
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

oldcajun - nice analysis and separating luxury vehicles from luxury brands.

my jeep grand cherokee summit is very luxurious but jeep is not a luxury brand.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 03:20 PM
  #92  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,484
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldcajun
I think part of the question is what is considered "Luxury" anymore as the lines get blurred. Mercedes is certainly a "Luxury Brand" but is the CLA250 a Luxury car? It is tiny inside, has a very stiff ride, is noisy, and the transmission shifting at low speeds is rough. The newest Ford Fusion includes a Platinum series which has a plush interior with real leather seats, good room, a smooth quiet ride, etc. Given that Ford is not a "Luxury Brand", the Platinum level Fusion is certainly more luxurious than a CLA. For about the same price, I'll take the Ford!
Tough call, the Mercedes CLA250 will grab more attention, will mean more to other people and will create more emotional reactions than a Ford Fusion. That IMO is the number differentiator when it comes to a luxury brand.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 04:41 PM
  #93  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I'll give you a personal example. There's a young guy in his mid-20's from my blended family who went to school and does IT engineering. He worked hard and got himself a great paying job. He's been driving a mid-2000's Honda Accord 4 cylinder for about the last four or five years. He likes it but doesn't think it has enough power.

A while back he figured he'd earned an upgrade. And the first car brand he went after was... Mercedes Benz and yes, it was the CLA. He even went as far as heading right to the dealership, pricing one out and test drive all that. He really, really liked it. He would have paid cash for all in. There's no way he's looking at Ford Fusions, or even another Accord. See, that's the power of brand marketing.

Fortunately for him, cooler heads prevailed and told him to wait and not blow his money right now. But I know he's determined to buy a Benz at some point.
MattyG is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 05:28 PM
  #94  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,606
Received 2,520 Likes on 1,818 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
my jeep grand cherokee summit is very luxurious but jeep is not a luxury brand.
And I'd rather have that than most luxury branded SUVs.

Have you seen the 2017 Summit? Huge upgrade, next to say an RX? No contest.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 05:41 PM
  #95  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyG
There's no way he's looking at Ford Fusions, or even another Accord. See, that's the power of brand marketing.

Fortunately for him, cooler heads prevailed and told him to wait and not blow his money right now. But I know he's determined to buy a Benz at some point.
He just might (?) like the Fusion if he actually takes the time to go look at one. I think, in some ways, it was better-done (and better-driving) than the last Lincoln MKZ, its upmarket brother....though I haven't checked out the latest 2017 MKZ with the new facelift this year.

mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 05:47 PM
  #96  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldcajun
I think part of the question is what is considered "Luxury" anymore as the lines get blurred. Mercedes is certainly a "Luxury Brand" but is the CLA250 a Luxury car? It is tiny inside, has a very stiff ride, is noisy, and the transmission shifting at low speeds is rough. The newest Ford Fusion includes a Platinum series which has a plush interior with real leather seats, good room, a smooth quiet ride, etc. Given that Ford is not a "Luxury Brand", the Platinum level Fusion is certainly more luxurious than a CLA. For about the same price, I'll take the Ford!
Yep....no arguments there (see my last post just above). The Fusion, IMO, is one of the best products the Ford Division produces....far more impressive, even considering the differences in price and size, than its Fiesta, Focus, and Taurus sedan stablemates.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 07:30 PM
  #97  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Tough call, the Mercedes CLA250 will grab more attention, will mean more to other people and will create more emotional reactions than a Ford Fusion. That IMO is the number differentiator when it comes to a luxury brand.
Yes. That's something hasn't been discussed that much. Some buying decisions are irrational and based solely on emotion and what we think others will see in us, for buying that particular car.

Originally Posted by mmarshall
He just might (?) like the Fusion if he actually takes the time to go look at one. I think, in some ways, it was better-done (and better-driving) than the last Lincoln MKZ, its upmarket brother....though I haven't checked out the latest 2017 MKZ with the new facelift this year.
He might just do some cross shopping, but the thing is, Ford is Dad's brand. He's a Millenial, dad's a baby boomer. Driving a Ford or a Lincoln is not really this kid's thing. He doesn't care about practicality or interior room or ride for that matter. He's drawn by the visceral look and driving experience of a car that closely resembles the much more upmarket CLS. And in our local market he's really only about $7-8KCAD from a fully loaded awd Fusion vs a CLA awd.

Now I haven't heard what he's done on this front lately but when he was telling me about his thinking, he was really all like smiles and talking like a Merc salesman. He's under 25, you have to remember. I was thinking about that enthusiasm. We've all been there haven't we? Bought the emotional choice vs the better value or the more practical car.
MattyG is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 08:21 PM
  #98  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,484
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyG
Yes. That's something hasn't been discussed that much. Some buying decisions are irrational and based solely on emotion and what we think others will see in us, for buying that particular car
I would still argue that it may not be irrational for the buyer to buy his CLA. If what he is after is prestige and a vehicle that has a good brand image, then go for it.

I think a more appropriate comparison for the buyer would something like a loaded Chrysler 200 vs the CLA. I think people do not factor in how much of branding factors into decisions.

Mercedes-Benz can charge whatever the premium is for the CLA vs the competition not because buyers are buying a better car, but because the buyers are purchasing a "perceived" better brand. Whether the CLA is worth the premium compared to a loaded Fusion is really up to that individual buyer. If it were me, I would get the CLA over a Fusion, it just so happens that i think the Mercedes-Benz brand is worth the premium that they often change.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 08:47 PM
  #99  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,606
Received 2,520 Likes on 1,818 Posts
Default

It's not irrational. It's his money, he should get what makes him happy. If he's after that brand image he'd never be happy with a Fusion.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 08-27-16, 08:56 PM
  #100  
MattyG
Lexus Champion
 
MattyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: RightHere
Posts: 2,300
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I would still argue that it may not be irrational for the buyer to buy his CLA. If what he is after is prestige and a vehicle that has a good brand image, then go for it.

I think a more appropriate comparison for the buyer would something like a loaded Chrysler 200 vs the CLA. I think people do not factor in how much of branding factors into decisions.

Mercedes-Benz can charge whatever the premium is for the CLA vs the competition not because buyers are buying a better car, but because the buyers are purchasing a "perceived" better brand. Whether the CLA is worth the premium compared to a loaded Fusion is really up to that individual buyer. If it were me, I would get the CLA over a Fusion, it just so happens that i think the Mercedes-Benz brand is worth the premium that they often change.
Yeah, he's the kid with his hard earned money, so his choice what he wants to do with it. If it was me, I too would be drifting over to the CLA. No, it's no LS or GS but does it need to be?

I'm not dissing the Fusion, because another friend of mine all the way in another country saw the previous versions of this car, rode in it and was so impressed, he still talks about buying one today. That's impressive branding right there for a mainstream brand. I told him. Buy it and you won't be disappointed. But he's a Ford guy and he's an older guy too.

When MB really brought out the CLA they had a target market in mind and they hit it dead-on. They won't sell them in my local market like hotcakes, but they will have an audience for them. The Fusion, Mazda 6, and the Sonata all have the same side profile and they all seem to blend together. The CLA easily stands out from all of these.
MattyG is offline  
Old 08-28-16, 03:14 AM
  #101  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
i think the Mercedes-Benz brand is worth the premium that they often change.
Have you ever owned one that was out of warranty......or past the free-service period, if applicable? Of course, that will not be an issue with a brand-new CLA, but the point remains that as they age, many M-B products become true money-pits.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 08-28-16, 07:58 AM
  #102  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Have you ever owned one that was out of warranty......or past the free-service period, if applicable? Of course, that will not be an issue with a brand-new CLA, but the point remains that as they age, many M-B products become true money-pits.
I realize it will take time for people's perception to change with MB since the daimler chrysler era, but this idea of high maintenance costs and poor reliability is really not something that should stop a person from buying into the brand. For MB, they do not give any free service except for a 1,000 mile check up. After that, it is a 10K maintenance cycle. I have noticed that it actually comes out even or also cheaper, than say Lexus which even though has 10K oil change cycles, still insist that you go in every 5K miles. Those 5K they dont do much but rotate tires and check fluids, and people get charged a little more than $150.

In addition, as an owner of a 2009 C class out of warranty for 3 years now, I have had no maintenance issues whatsoever with the car. Only now have 8 years has a rattle developed by the rear sunshade. Two months ago, I went into service and they said one of the "O" rings is failing for the engine coolant and so there was signs of leaking around the edge. Not really a big deal, didn't perform the fix at the time since I am planning to sell the vehicle. All things considered, this C class has been more reliable than my 2011 RX450h (granted the RX has been cheaper to maintain since it doesn't have much maintenance needs)

Last edited by RXSF; 08-28-16 at 08:02 AM.
RXSF is offline  
Old 08-28-16, 07:59 AM
  #103  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,484
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
, but the point remains that as they age, many M-B products become true money-pits.
The selling point of a Mercedes-Benz is not reliability and low cost of repair.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 08-28-16, 08:22 AM
  #104  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,484
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
I realize it will take time for people's perception to change with MB since the daimler chrysler era
I really don't think this has much influence on general Mercedes consumers.

Originally Posted by RXSF
After that, it is a 10K maintenance cycle. I have noticed that it actually comes out even or also cheaper, than say Lexus which even though has 10K oil change cycles, still insist that you go in every 5K miles. Those 5K they dont do much but rotate tires and check fluids, and people get charged a little more than $150.
I noticed the pre-paid maintenance plans are not horribly over-priced for Mercedes-Benz. A C-class comes out to $1599 for four years which gives you four services. That also includes brake fluid changes. That IMO is fully competitive with Lexus or even Toyota. From what I understand new 2016 Lexus and Toyota do not get any oil changed at in between intervals now, the car comes in for service at 5k and 15k and gets everything but the oil changed.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 08-28-16 at 08:28 AM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 08-28-16, 08:31 AM
  #105  
BrownPride
Lead Lap
 
BrownPride's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Coast
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In the spirit of the NFL season, this reminds me a lot of the Joe Flacco debate we always hear. "Is he elite?" is always the question. Well, the guy puts up great numbers and has a great winning %, and is objectively more successful than Manning in the post-season; but why isn't he considered in the same class as Brady, Manning, Rodgers, etc.? On paper he's right there isn't he? Well it comes down to the intangibles. He's good but doesn't have the "it" factor that those other guys do.

Same goes for a say, Camry XLE with more features (including real leather) that your pricier run-of-the-mill Lexus IS does not have! When it comes to luxury, you are not only buying features but are buying into a brand and a lifestyle. If for you, having the same features as a car that's priced $10K higher is "luxury" then that's your choice, I'm not ******* you for it. In fact I'm jealous that you can be happy in life without chasing material items. However, for most people, luxury is more than just X Y and Z on a piece of paper. If that needs explaining to you then you aren't in the target demographic of brands like BMW, Lexus, Mercedes, Rolex, Louis Vuitton, Fairmont, etc. Nothing wrong with that!
BrownPride is offline  


Quick Reply: What's The Point Of Owning A 'Luxury' Car Anymore?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:09 AM.