Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

JD Power Initial Quality Study - 2016: Kia, Porsche, Hyundai

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-22-16, 12:22 PM
  #1  
pbm317
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,888
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default JD Power Initial Quality Study - 2016: Kia, Porsche, Hyundai

Results are out for the 2016 JD Power Initial Quality Study. I know a lot of people feel that the longer term Vehicle Dependability Study is more telling, but this is no small feat in and of itself. First time in 27 years than a non-lux brand has taken first place.





http://www.jdpower.com/press-release...lity-study-iqs
pbm317 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 12:23 PM
  #2  
pbm317
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,888
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Press Release from JD Power

Kia Ranks Highest among Nameplates, Ending 27-Year Reign for Premium Brands
DETROIT: 22 June 2016 — New-vehicle quality improves 6%, double the 3% rate of improvement in 2015 and the largest increase since 2009, according to the J.D. Power 2016 U.S. Initial Quality StudySM (IQS), released today.

The study, now in its 30th year, examines problems experienced by vehicle owners during the first 90 days of ownership. Initial quality is determined by the number of problems experienced per 100 vehicles (PP100), with a lower score reflecting higher quality.

Quality improves across all eight problem categories measured in the study, with 21 of the 33 brands included in the study improving their quality in 2016 and one remaining the same.

“Manufacturers are currently making some of the highest quality products we’ve ever seen,” said Renee Stephens, vice president of U.S. automotive quality at J.D. Power. “Tracking our data over the past several years, it has become clear that automakers are listening to the customer, identifying pain points and are focused on continuous improvement. Even as they add more content, including advanced technologies that have had a reputation for causing problems, overall quality continues to improve.”

Following are some of the study’s key findings:

U.S. Domestic Automakers Show Strong Improvement: For just the second time in the 30-year history of the study, U.S. domestic brands collectively have lower problem levels than all their import counterparts combined. All three U.S. domestic automakers post year-over-year quality improvements. The “Detroit Three” achieve a combined average of 103 PP100, improving 10% from 2015, which is double the improvement rate of the import brands at 106 PP100. The last time U.S. domestic brands outpaced imports was in 2010, when they held a 1 PP100 advantage (108 PP100 vs. 109 PP100, respectively).
Non-Premium Brands Have Fewer Problems: For the first time since 2006, non-premium brands have fewer problems (104 PP100) than premium brands (108 PP100).
High Quality = High Loyalty: Expected reliability remains the most important consideration when purchasing a new vehicle, cited by 49% of owners. J.D. Power has studied consumer behavior from when they purchase or lease their new vehicle through when they are back in the market for their next vehicle in order to measure the impact initial quality has on brand loyalty.[1] Among owners who experience no problems with their vehicle in the first 90 days, 54% stay with the same brand for their next vehicle. Loyalty drops to 50% among owners who experience one problem with their vehicle and to 45% among those who experience three or more problems.
“There is a direct correlation between the number of problems a customer has with their new vehicle and the decisions they make when it comes time to purchase or lease their next car or truck,” said Stephens. “While a small drop in actual loyalty may not sound like much, a percentage point drop in share can mean millions of dollars in lost revenue to an automaker.”

Highest-Ranked Nameplates and Models
Kia ranks highest in initial quality with a score of 83 PP100, the first time in 27 years that a non-premium brand has topped the rankings. It is also the second consecutive year that Kia, which ranked second in 2015, has led all non-premium makes in initial quality.

Porsche (84 PP100) ranks second among nameplates, followed by Hyundai (92 PP100), Toyota (93 PP100) and BMW (94 PP100).

Chrysler and Jeep are the most improved brands, each reducing the number of problems by 28 PP100 from 2015.

General Motors receives seven model-level awards, followed by Toyota Motor Corporation with six and Hyundai Motor Company and Volkswagen AG, each with four.

General Motors models that rank highest in their respective segments are the Buick Cascada; Chevrolet Equinox; Chevrolet Silverado HD; Chevrolet Silverado LD; Chevrolet Spark; Chevrolet Tahoe; and GMC Terrain.
Toyota Motor Corporation models that rank highest in their segment are the Lexus CT; Lexus GS; Scion tC; Toyota Camry; Toyota Corolla; and Toyota Highlander.
Hyundai Motor Company models that rank highest in their segment are the Hyundai Accent; Hyundai Azera; Kia Soul; and Kia Sportage.
Volkswagen AG models that rank highest in their segment are the Audi Q3, Audi TT, Porsche Macan and Porsche 911.
Plant Quality Awards
Toyota Motor Corporation’s Georgetown 3 (Kentucky) plant, which produces the Lexus ES, and its Kyushu 2 (Japan) plant, which produces the Lexus ES and Lexus RX, each receive the Platinum Plant Quality Award in a tie for producing models with the fewest defects or malfunctions. Plant quality awards are based solely on defects and malfunctions and exclude design-related problems.

Porsche’s Stuttgart (Germany) plant, which produces the Porsche 911 and Porsche Boxster, receives the Gold Plant Quality Award in the Europe/Africa region.

The 2016 U.S. Initial Quality Study is based on responses from more than 80,000 purchasers and lessees of new 2016 model-year vehicles surveyed after 90 days of ownership. The study is based on a 233-question battery organized into eight problem categories designed to provide manufacturers with information to facilitate the identification of problems and drive product improvement. The study was fielded from February through May 2016.
pbm317 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 12:26 PM
  #3  
Mike728
Lead Lap
 
Mike728's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: IL
Posts: 4,704
Received 611 Likes on 459 Posts
Default

Lexus should really drop in the next survey. The navigation issue will come back and bite them hard!
Mike728 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 12:52 PM
  #4  
pbm317
Lead Lap
Thread Starter
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,888
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike728
Lexus should really drop in the next survey. The navigation issue will come back and bite them hard!
I actually don't think it will.... the 2017 survey will be on 2017MY vehicles, which I don't believe Lexus has any out at this time that were impacted by that the navigation shut down issue, and their performance within the first 90 days of ownership. So that hiccup will likely not impact any IQS scores for Lexus. It may impact their VDS scores, but we'll see.
pbm317 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 06:24 PM
  #5  
dseag2
Lexus Champion
 
dseag2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 4,662
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

The fact that Chevrolet is in 6th place is quite a feat on their part. Maybe it has to do with expectations of buyers.
dseag2 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 06:47 PM
  #6  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dseag2
The fact that Chevrolet is in 6th place is quite a feat on their part. Maybe it has to do with expectations of buyers.
Their marketing has been strong too. Targeting Ford with their truck ads, targeting young buyers with the 'wifi, unicorn' commericial, targeting potential upscale buyers with a debadged Malibu etc.. and to be fair they are deservedly so nowadays. I still personally don't want a Chevy, but I give them kudos as they've come a lonnng way.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 07:42 PM
  #7  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mike728
Lexus should really drop in the next survey. The navigation issue will come back and bite them hard!
Lexus may be hurt in future 3-year dependability surveys but won't be hurt in the 2017 Initial Quality Survey:
  1. The infotainment system update did not affect 2017 vehicles, since 2017 models are not out yet (and 2017 models will probably come from the factory with the update already installed).
  2. People's memories are short, so unless this problem happens again (and again), people will have forgotten about it when asked for the 3-year dependability survey.
Sulu is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 07:46 PM
  #8  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dseag2
The fact that Chevrolet is in 6th place is quite a feat on their part. Maybe it has to do with expectations of buyers.
Exactly. When an automaker has low ratings and buyers expect that, anything better than before is going to look really good. But when you are consistently at the top, any small misstep is going to be bad.
Sulu is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 07:59 PM
  #9  
dseag2
Lexus Champion
 
dseag2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 4,662
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
Exactly. When an automaker has low ratings and buyers expect that, anything better than before is going to look really good. But when you are consistently at the top, any small misstep is going to be bad.
Yep. Those were exactly my thoughts. Expectations are set really high in the luxury category. Buyers in that segment expect everything to be perfect and they LOOK FOR imperfections.
dseag2 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 08:00 PM
  #10  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,486
Received 2,499 Likes on 1,802 Posts
Default

I've said it many times, our 2015 Kia Sedona is excellent. Build quality exceeds most of my Lexus vehicles that I've owned. Very solid and well built. Nav updates include added upgrades to the UI and functionality of the system (as in, the update out for mine adds Apple CarPlay as well as a different improved destination entering program, birds eye maps with 3D buildings, Lexus/Toyota would NEVER offer such an upgrade).

All in all, I will definitely own more Hyundai/Kia products. In fact, I kind of feel that I may have bought my last Toyota product.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 08:05 PM
  #11  
dseag2
Lexus Champion
 
dseag2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 4,662
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW15LS
I've said it many times, our 2015 Kia Sedona is excellent. Build quality exceeds most of my Lexus vehicles that I've owned. Very solid and well built. Nav updates include added upgrades to the UI and functionality of the system (as in, the update out for mine adds Apple CarPlay as well as a different improved destination entering program, birds eye maps with 3D buildings, Lexus/Toyota would NEVER offer such an upgrade).

All in all, I will definitely own more Hyundai/Kia products. In fact, I kind of feel that I may have bought my last Toyota product.
Great to see Kia making such strides. I would consider that brand as well, especially since Peter Schreyer, the design guy from Audi has gone over there and is cranking out better looking cars than Audi is these days.
dseag2 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 08:15 PM
  #12  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,486
Received 2,499 Likes on 1,802 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dseag2
Great to see Kia making such strides. I would consider that brand as well, especially since Peter Schreyer, the design guy from Audi has gone over there and is cranking out better looking cars than Audi is these days.
You can see his influence for sure, especially inside...
SW17LS is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 10:46 PM
  #13  
pman6
Racer
 
pman6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: CALIFORNIA
Posts: 1,903
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

kia hyundai have more of my respect. They're moving forward incredibly.

whereas lexus is stagnating, kia and hyundai are bangin out more attractive cars and doing things other mainstream brands are not..... like making RWD sedans.

It's like their boss greenlights every cool thing that comes across his desk, while other brands are just counting beans and canceling vehicles.

Look at that GT, and they're not watering it down much for the production.



Last edited by pman6; 06-22-16 at 10:52 PM.
pman6 is offline  
Old 06-22-16, 11:41 PM
  #14  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,676
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Another contradicting result from JD Power. This goes against much of what we see and study from Consumer Reports. Subaru and Honda are currently ranked extremely high in reliability, and have been for decades. To be this low on this study is very strange. I am absolutely certain PERCEPTION is playing in the minds of owners here. With that in play, these announcements really do not provide the general public a good service.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 06-23-16, 02:21 AM
  #15  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,681
Received 2,096 Likes on 1,359 Posts
Default

^^^ CR may be 'popular' or trusted, but that doesn't mean it's any better than anything else.

But it is amusing to see Jeep above Honda, Acura, Mazda and others
bitkahuna is offline  


Quick Reply: JD Power Initial Quality Study - 2016: Kia, Porsche, Hyundai



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:38 AM.