2017 highlander
#31
what a difference it makes to make the top grille smaller.
The 2015 model front end looked so dumpy
even if they did put the logo in the center, it would have still looked ugly...
The 2015 model front end looked so dumpy
even if they did put the logo in the center, it would have still looked ugly...
Last edited by pman6; 03-16-16 at 01:07 AM.
#32
I have a good feeling that the bumper and grills will be swap-able. I mean you can swap the 2015 and earlier bumpers with the new one.
#33
Well, I haven't seen the interior yet, but safe to say that members here used to upscale interiors should be ready for a reality check, when the interiors surface. I can appreciate that the love for the Highlander probably has partly to do something with the polarizing RX looks. But the look should be easy to grow into, but much harder would be to accept the ho-hum (read: Economy Class) interior. We'll see.
With respect to LED's and other latest techs, I agree it's about time. Forum members must have noticed that mainstream cars like the latest Honda Civic has taken the charge to bring the latest higher end techs to mass market. LED's back and front, CarPlay, Android Auto, full range collision mitigation etc. We knew this was going to happen as a reaction to Luxury marques trying to woo mainstream customers.
So what's my point? Over time, the differentiation between mainstream and "near mainstream" luxury is going to get even slimmer, if it hasn't already. The separation will be/is in just in the name and the dollar premium for "refinement". Value proposition of refinement per dollar spent is and will remain subjective.
As for me, I have always liked the functionality of the Highlander, and wished for a third row affordable RX-esque Lexus. But with kids, thanks to forum member suggestions, I am happy with a Limited Premium Sienna for the time being. These changes to the Highlander and future Sienna are very welcome. My dream car: A Lexus Pacifica Will it ever build one? Likely not.
With respect to LED's and other latest techs, I agree it's about time. Forum members must have noticed that mainstream cars like the latest Honda Civic has taken the charge to bring the latest higher end techs to mass market. LED's back and front, CarPlay, Android Auto, full range collision mitigation etc. We knew this was going to happen as a reaction to Luxury marques trying to woo mainstream customers.
So what's my point? Over time, the differentiation between mainstream and "near mainstream" luxury is going to get even slimmer, if it hasn't already. The separation will be/is in just in the name and the dollar premium for "refinement". Value proposition of refinement per dollar spent is and will remain subjective.
As for me, I have always liked the functionality of the Highlander, and wished for a third row affordable RX-esque Lexus. But with kids, thanks to forum member suggestions, I am happy with a Limited Premium Sienna for the time being. These changes to the Highlander and future Sienna are very welcome. My dream car: A Lexus Pacifica Will it ever build one? Likely not.
#34
#35
Pole Position
Turbo lovers will want to know where's the new turbo engine. Why is Toyota so far behind engine tech. It makes sense for the Highlander since this is considered a mid cycle refresh. It is strange that the Sienna is getting it so late in its life cycle. The mid cycle refresh came out two years ago I think and will probably have at most 1 or two more years before a complete redesign. Unless I missed something and 2017 is a redesign of the Sienna.
#36
Lexus Fanatic
Turbo lovers will want to know where's the new turbo engine. Why is Toyota so far behind engine tech. It makes sense for the Highlander since this is considered a mid cycle refresh. It is strange that the Sienna is getting it so late in its life cycle. The mid cycle refresh came out two years ago I think and will probably have at most 1 or two more years before a complete redesign. Unless I missed something and 2017 is a redesign of the Sienna.
Personally, I think the Highlander in fully loaded trim is in almost every single way a better vehicle that the RX.
The RX should get the turbo option.
#37
Pole Position
I was being sarcastic, mocking turbo proponents. If anything vehicles like the Highlander, Sienna, RX, pickup trucks, you know heavy vehicles would benefit from a turbo with its low end grunt. Turbos can be reliable too no? But you're right, I prefer a smooth strong NA V6.
#39
Super Moderator
As "similarly equipped" as I can get the current (2016) highlander hybrid and RXh on the respective websites, the RXh comes out about $8k more expensive. That's substantial--roughly 16% more. And at that point, the Highlander has heated rear captain's chairs and a third row, while the RXh has an unheated bench and only two rows.
#40
Lexus Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
really? i don't know about the new rx, but the last gen wasn't particularly quiet at all. and i drove the current highlander and thought it was pretty quiet. wouldn't be surprised if this significantly refreshed highlander is quieter though. the 8 speed will help with lower rpms, but obviously there's other noise sources like tires, wind, etc.
#41
Lexus Test Driver
really? i don't know about the new rx, but the last gen wasn't particularly quiet at all. and i drove the current highlander and thought it was pretty quiet. wouldn't be surprised if this significantly refreshed highlander is quieter though. the 8 speed will help with lower rpms, but obviously there's other noise sources like tires, wind, etc.
#42
Lexus Champion
More power and better fuel economy? looks like Toyota has gotten my attention again but I'll wait to see the numbers. Seeing the same power train in the the Sienna is definitely a welcome sight.
#43
really? i don't know about the new rx, but the last gen wasn't particularly quiet at all. and i drove the current highlander and thought it was pretty quiet. wouldn't be surprised if this significantly refreshed highlander is quieter though. the 8 speed will help with lower rpms, but obviously there's other noise sources like tires, wind, etc.
There will be obviously large differences in refinement and quality between two vehicles, but of course not everyone needs extra luxury in RX.
#44
really? i don't know about the new rx, but the last gen wasn't particularly quiet at all. and i drove the current highlander and thought it was pretty quiet. wouldn't be surprised if this significantly refreshed highlander is quieter though. the 8 speed will help with lower rpms, but obviously there's other noise sources like tires, wind, etc.
#45
Lexus Fanatic
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 7,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pretty happy about this refresh. Next year I will be buying a 3-row crossover. I have been in love with the Highlander for the last couple of years and it was all but a guarantee until Mazda revealed the new CX-9. Then it became an equal battle, both offering different advantages but the Highlander was starting to get a bit stale. This update fixes a lot but the decision is still going to be tough.