Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Marchionne blames design 'dummies' for poor Chrysler 200 reception

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-16, 10:13 AM
  #16  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
Man that's a lot of hate for what I think is a good(not great) car. I'd take a Cruze any day of the week over a Focus or the last gen Corolla. It has a really solid feel both in the way its constructed, the way it rides, its quiet, basically it doesn't feel like the bad old days GM. Plus I like the styling and interior layout.
I am with you on this one. It is definitely a good/great car that I would not hesitate recommending to someone looking at that segment.
chikoo is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:21 AM
  #17  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Interestingly enough, Sergio said today in his investors presentation that the 200 and Dart will "run their course" and they'll be looking for partners for next-gen models while they focus on crossovers, pickups, and hybrid powertrains.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:26 AM
  #18  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TangoRed
Interestingly enough, Sergio said today in his investors presentation that the 200 and Dart will "run their course" and they'll be looking for partners for next-gen models while they focus on crossovers, pickups, and hybrid powertrains.
That would send a huge red flag to me if I held their stock or bonds.

That's basically admitting defeat. He said in so many words that the company is incapable of designing a competitive small car that would turn a profit. That also shows me that Fiat is in pretty sad shape since that is what the company has always specialized in, building small, economical, cheap to own cars.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:34 AM
  #19  
mikez
Lexus Champion
 
mikez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,906
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
The 200 with the 4-cyl engine must be absolutely terrible then. I had a Cruz rental last year that I thought was not that bad, definitely better than a 2013(?) Malibu I had once as another rental.
Well the cruz is kind of down there in terms of price and who it competes with, so I just meant that for a entry level / border line luxury car to feel the same, its pretty bad

Not to mention I also had 2 other co workers in the cruz, and we were driving up and down the hills of SF, while I drove the 200C in the flat lands of Atlanta haha
mikez is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:37 AM
  #20  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
That would send a huge red flag to me if I held their stock or bonds.

That's basically admitting defeat. He said in so many words that the company is incapable of designing a competitive small car that would turn a profit. That also shows me that Fiat is in pretty sad shape since that is what the company has always specialized in, building small, economical, cheap to own cars.
That's one way to take it. The other way is that this is consistent with what he's been saying all along- the overhead of creating cars in hyper competitive segments (midsize, compact) is enormous and it doesn't make sense without cooperation with other automakers.

Fiat does indeed do great with small, economical, cheap to own cars in global markets. Those aren't the same midsize cars and small vehicles we see fit for consumption here in the US.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 10:51 AM
  #21  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,679
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Oh please, here we go again with more corporate BS for the public. The sloping roofline is NOT the reason the car is not selling well. It is not selling well for the exact same reasons all the past Chysler sedans have not sold well- poor execution in most other areas. Engine being on top of the list. Hyundai and many others have done perfectly fine with the sloping roofline sedans, so there is no way that can be used as an excuse.

It really irks me when we are fed these stories, and the general public goobles it up like truth. When one does a small amount of research, reads car reviews, follows the industry, and sees the patterns, the real reasons are clear.
Fizzboy7 is online now  
Old 01-27-16, 11:07 AM
  #22  
BrownPride
Lead Lap
 
BrownPride's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: West Coast
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I have a lot of background history with the American "Big 3" automakers including Chrysler and this report doesn't surprise me one bit. Behind the facade of a really sharp looking body and improved interior compared to Chryslers of the past, the 200 is still a POS. The Japanese, despite making more mundane sedans, make the best sedans. People aren't stupid for flocking to Toyota and Honda dealerships.
BrownPride is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 11:18 AM
  #23  
evident
Racer
 
evident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,381
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

I had a 200 rental the other month. It simply was the worst car I've ever driven, ingress egress was the last thing I could complain about of that vehicle.
evident is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 12:58 PM
  #24  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,284
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evident
I had a 200 rental the other month. It simply was the worst car I've ever driven, ingress egress was the last thing I could complain about of that vehicle.
I dunno, the Sebring and Caliber before it were just awful
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 02:00 PM
  #25  
Stereorob
Lexus Test Driver
 
Stereorob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,582
Received 100 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
I dunno, the Sebring and Caliber before it were just awful
sebring was absolutely disgusting. so were pretty much all other late 90s 2000s Chrysler products. kind of surprised they made it this far. the 300m was a pile of garbage right from the rip. I worked at a Chrysler dealership back in 2003 and remember the 300 "special" M's coming off the truck still wrapped in plastic already falling apart and pissing fluids.

always sort of liked the 2nd gen intrepids and concords, no idea why. the sebring was a pile of garbage but atleast most were convertibles so it made them fun to drive.. sort of. lol
Stereorob is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 02:14 PM
  #26  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,284
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stereorob
sebring was absolutely disgusting. so were pretty much all other late 90s 2000s Chrysler products. kind of surprised they made it this far. the 300m was a pile of garbage right from the rip. I worked at a Chrysler dealership back in 2003 and remember the 300 "special" M's coming off the truck still wrapped in plastic already falling apart and pissing fluids.

always sort of liked the 2nd gen intrepids and concords, no idea why. the sebring was a pile of garbage but atleast most were convertibles so it made them fun to drive.. sort of. lol
I oddly liked the Intrepid too
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 02:16 PM
  #27  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Is there a picture or video of how badly the ingress is?
chikoo is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 02:29 PM
  #28  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,587
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
This one is dedicated to Mike (mmarshall)...



Source: Autoblog

Mike has been harping on this subject for a while now. I have to say (now) that I agree with Mike.

You must feel some vindication, Mike, now that a major (and outspoken) automaker CEO agrees with you!
Thanks.....but I really didn't really come up with anything remarkable. It doesn't take a degree in physics, when you look at a humpback-whale rear roofline and a couple of six-footers, to see that the two won't mix. (And I've bumped my own head enough times reviewing many vehicles with them LOL).

And......back to Marchionne. You'll notice that all of his own American-market Fiat products (except, off course, the Miata-based Spyder) have tall roofs and plenty of headroom, even the minuscule 500. Perhaps that's one reason (among several) why Pope Francis chose a 500L to ride around D.C. in instead of a traditional limo.


On the rest of the 200, though, I myself thought the old 200/Sebring/Cirrus was shoddily-made, with cheap materials (and, yes, I've panned that car for years). But, despite the low rear roofline (and, yes, I agree that roofline s**ks), my overall opinion of the latest 200 is much better. Like other recent Chrysler products, it has made great strides in fit/finish, material quality, drivetrain refinement, and overall driving enjoyment. I did a full-review of the latest 200 not long ago, and was generally impressed with most things on it (it was a V6, not an in-line 4) except for the quirky rotary-**** shifter, which I haven't liked on Jaguars and Land Rovers either.

But the major design error on the new 200, IMO, was in dropping the convertible. The convertible was probably the best thing about the previous design (perhaps the only good thing about it LOL). It was a decent-sized convertible that, unlike most of today's ragtops, actually offered room in the back for two adults. Most convertibles can only squeeze small kids in back (if that)? because of the space needed for the fold-down roof. It also, unlike many ragtops that size, had an affordable price. Now, of course, Chrysler has lost that market, and the upcoming Buick Cascada convertible, though a little smaller than the 200, is set to grab the former Chrysler convertible market.

Last edited by mmarshall; 01-27-16 at 02:50 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 02:56 PM
  #29  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,587
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Lots of comments here, BTW, from posters, about what a POS the 200 is. Don't mix apples and oranges, though. That WAS true of the last 200, and its Dodge Stratus counterpart. But, except for the roofline, one or two minor design goofs inside, and not carrying forward the old convertible (which IMO was a mistake), the new 200 is FAR better than the old one in almost every way....especially with the V6 and the new transmission.

Last edited by mmarshall; 01-27-16 at 03:10 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 01-27-16, 03:03 PM
  #30  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,587
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PhilipMSPT
Rear roofline? That surely isn't the only problem...


But it's also one of the main reasons the Acura ZDX failed.........

mmarshall is offline  


Quick Reply: Marchionne blames design 'dummies' for poor Chrysler 200 reception



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:34 PM.