Taco Bell executive who attacks Uber driver sues for $5million
#31
Lexus Fanatic
#32
Lol, I guess its tough being an Uber driver these days. Here's a story of another case where one is attacked by a woman doctor of all things. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/01/22...er-driver.html
#33
Moderator
iTrader: (8)
Lol, I guess its tough being an Uber driver these days. Here's a story of another case where one is attacked by a woman doctor of all things. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2016/01/22...er-driver.html
#34
Any attorney would tell you to post a notice saying that people are being recorded. Why do you think those notices are posted? In any event, a business is different because the person doesn't have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public.
The issue comes if you are going to use that video or audio recording as evidence. If it was obtained in an illegal manner...they won't allow it.
What is the issue with posting a notice?
And here are some excerpts from your link:
As I said before, AUDIO recordings are more problematic. The recording in question here is also an AUDIO recording.
More excerpts:
FYI, the case we're discussing the recording was done in Nevada, a two party consent state. This recording was an illegal audio recording because it only had the consent of one party.
So again, what I said is accurate:
You can't necessarily record people in your property without their consent, especially audio recordings.
The issue comes if you are going to use that video or audio recording as evidence. If it was obtained in an illegal manner...they won't allow it.
What is the issue with posting a notice?
And here are some excerpts from your link:
As I said before, AUDIO recordings are more problematic. The recording in question here is also an AUDIO recording.
More excerpts:
FYI, the case we're discussing the recording was done in Nevada, a two party consent state. This recording was an illegal audio recording because it only had the consent of one party.
So again, what I said is accurate:
You can't necessarily record people in your property without their consent, especially audio recordings.
#35
Lexus Fanatic
Deleting the audio in this case would make it worse for the Uber driver.
#36
I still don't see how this video/audio evidence could be thrown out of court. IMO Taco Bell guy was using public transportation. A taxi, the bus, the subway, a train, a commercial air flight, an uber car, IMO all meet the definition of public transportation.
When you use public transportation, it is common knowledge that you will be filmed and that you should expect no rights to your privacy IMO.
When you use public transportation, it is common knowledge that you will be filmed and that you should expect no rights to your privacy IMO.
#37
Lexus Fanatic
I still don't see how this video/audio evidence could be thrown out of court. IMO Taco Bell guy was using public transportation. A taxi, the bus, the subway, a train, a commercial air flight, an uber car, IMO all meet the definition of public transportation.
When you use public transportation, it is common knowledge that you will be filmed and that you should expect no rights to your privacy IMO.
When you use public transportation, it is common knowledge that you will be filmed and that you should expect no rights to your privacy IMO.
We'll have to wait and see.
#39
Lexus Fanatic
If he can't prove he informed him it's meaningless.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bagwell
Car Chat
169
04-07-17 10:44 AM