Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Lexus LC News

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-15, 10:00 AM
  #1246  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 31,475
Received 67 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
This is a bit ridiculous - this is going to be Flagship / Halo car for Lexus and they are putting a 10 year old engine in it?
This seems to be the norm for Lexus, most of their high end stuff have very dated powertrains. In all honesty, I have never really taken their F stuff very seriously. BMW, Audi and MB do it so much better.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 12-06-15, 01:21 PM
  #1247  
SNiiP3R
Lead Lap
iTrader: (3)
 
SNiiP3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fuhgeddaboudit
Posts: 4,086
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
This seems to be the norm for Lexus, most of their high end stuff have very dated powertrains. In all honesty, I have never really taken their F stuff very seriously. BMW, Audi and MB do it so much better.
Lexus competes with cars from another dimension
SNiiP3R is offline  
Old 12-06-15, 02:56 PM
  #1248  
RXSF
Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,055
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
This seems to be the norm for Lexus, most of their high end stuff have very dated powertrains. In all honesty, I have never really taken their F stuff very seriously. BMW, Audi and MB do it so much better.
I agree with you, but let's not forget that BMW and MB also have had decades to engineer and perfect their strategies for their performance brands. The first M3 and early AMGs didn't have much to offer besides more power and really the same body panels. That was their original allure, being discreet cars that didn't look much different but had better performance. Let us give Lexus a little credit and time.
RXSF is offline  
Old 12-06-15, 03:18 PM
  #1249  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,739
Received 171 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

I have no problem at all with them using the V8. It's a great engine that most reviewers speak highly of. I don't think the average, wealthy executive walking around a Lexus showroom would care much about tunable turbos and drag racing anyway. Think of the original roll the SC played. I look at this car as filling the same roll, part II.
Fizzboy7 is offline  
Old 12-06-15, 03:26 PM
  #1250  
RXSF
Moderator
Forum Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,055
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
I have no problem at all with them using the V8. It's a great engine that most reviewers speak highly of. I don't think the average, wealthy executive walking around a Lexus showroom would care much about tunable turbos and drag racing anyway. Think of the original roll the SC played. I look at this car as filling the same roll, part II.
fact is that a NA 5.0 is antiquated tech. the 4.6L twin turbo that MB uses in all its high end models has just as much hp, loads more torque, and gets better MPG numbers to boot. There really is no downside but I guess we will just have to wait and see what tomoco has in store for us
RXSF is offline  
Old 12-06-15, 05:31 PM
  #1251  
Hoovey689
Moderator
Forum Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,310
Received 126 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
fact is that a NA 5.0 is antiquated tech. the 4.6L twin turbo that MB uses in all its high end models has just as much hp, loads more torque, and gets better MPG numbers to boot. There really is no downside but I guess we will just have to wait and see what tomoco has in store for us
The Lexus 5.0 has some pretty advanced features:

The Ford 5.0 'Coyote' and 5.2 'Voodoo' also seem pretty awesome for NA V8's.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 12-06-15, 06:52 PM
  #1252  
dseag2
Lead Lap
 
dseag2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: TX
Posts: 4,664
Received 18 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fizzboy7
I have no problem at all with them using the V8. It's a great engine that most reviewers speak highly of. I don't think the average, wealthy executive walking around a Lexus showroom would care much about tunable turbos and drag racing anyway. Think of the original roll the SC played. I look at this car as filling the same roll, part II.
What he said.
dseag2 is offline  
Old 12-06-15, 09:01 PM
  #1253  
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
TF109B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,266
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Most these turbo's are a new fad to get cheap numbers and fuel efficiency. Lets see how they hold up in 5 years time.

Btw, the GS F has had positive driving reactions. Its not a drag monster but the impressions seem pretty good. This car is brand new. I dont think its based on any current chassis(?) so there's already a positive.
TF109B is offline  
Old 12-07-15, 03:02 AM
  #1254  
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Mr Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
The Lexus 5.0 has some pretty advanced features:
Yes, but it still lacks in torque and needs to be driven really hard to give some action. The sound is actually the only real positive thing ( GS-F, RC-F) journalists and others mentions about it if you listen carefully. I know that this engine has been updated but I have driven it in the IS-F back in 2012 and I do agree with the reviews. This engine is for "sound enthusiast" not something you really put up against the competition, especially not in 2017/18.
Mr Bond is offline  
Old 12-07-15, 04:33 AM
  #1255  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TF109B
Most these turbo's are a new fad to get cheap numbers and fuel efficiency. Lets see how they hold up in 5 years time.
Lol. BMW's first round of turbo V8 and I6's were bad, but Mercedes and Audi's engines are tracking well so far. And I guess it won't be a bad fad anymore when Lexus finally debut's its turbo V8.

Originally Posted by TF109B
Btw, the GS F has had positive driving reactions. Its not a drag monster but the impressions seem pretty good. This car is brand new. I dont think its based on any current chassis(?) so there's already a positive.
What do you mean? Both the engine and chassis are massaged versions of already-existing components.
TangoRed is offline  
Old 12-07-15, 07:36 AM
  #1256  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Here we go again... The 5.0-litre V8 in the RC-F and LC is NOT an old engine...

Originally Posted by Hoovey2411
The Lexus 5.0 has some pretty advanced features:

The 2UR-GSE is an all-alloy quad-cam, 32-valve V8 with Yamaha-designed high-flow cylinder heads, titanium inlet valves, high-lift camshafts and dual-length intake. It has D4-S gasoline port and direct injection, Dual VVT-i with electric VVT-iE inlet camshaft actuation. Otto and Atkinson Cycles. Compression ratio of 12.3:1


Only the engine block (and therefore, the displacement) is shared with the original 2UR V8. The moving bits, specifically the valvetrain, is completely new and state-of-the-art with on-demand Atkinson and Otto cycles -- Atkinson cycle for efficiency at lower engine speeds and Otto cycle for power at higher engine speeds. No other automaker in the world offers this type of valvetrain, not Audi, not BMW, not Mercedes-Benz.

Originally Posted by Mr Bond
Yes, but it still lacks in torque and needs to be driven really hard to give some action. The sound is actually the only real positive thing ( GS-F, RC-F) journalists and others mentions about it if you listen carefully. I know that this engine has been updated but I have driven it in the IS-F back in 2012 and I do agree with the reviews. This engine is for "sound enthusiast" not something you really put up against the competition, especially not in 2017/18.
The 5.0-litre V8 used in the original IS-F and the 5.0-litre V8 used in the RC-F (and upcoming LC) are different engines, with a completely new valvetrain (see above). The new V8 did not come out until it was first introduced in the RC-F in 2014; it was NOT offered in the 2012 IS-F. Unless you have driven the RC-F, you have not driven this new V8.

Originally Posted by TF109B
Most these turbo's are a new fad to get cheap numbers and [cheap, easy] fuel efficiency [for regulators, including EPA]. Lets see how they hold up in 5 years time.
Fixed it for you. Turbos have been slapped on smaller-displacement engines in the hope that they will give the on-demand power of larger-displacement engines but the fuel efficiency of the smaller displacement engines when driven conservatively. They work for the EPA and European fuel economy cycles but, by-and-large, the fuel economy sticker numbers have not met real-life fuel consumption figures.
Sulu is offline  
Old 12-07-15, 08:09 AM
  #1257  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
I agree with you, but let's not forget that BMW and MB also have had decades to engineer and perfect their strategies for their performance brands. The first M3 and early AMGs didn't have much to offer besides more power and really the same body panels. That was their original allure, being discreet cars that didn't look much different but had better performance. Let us give Lexus a little credit and time.
Are you kidding me? early amg's were full of varierty, c36, c43, e class hammer, sl73.
doge is offline  
Old 12-07-15, 08:27 AM
  #1258  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
Here we go again... The 5.0-litre V8 in the RC-F and LC is NOT an old engine...





Only the engine block (and therefore, the displacement) is shared with the original 2UR V8. The moving bits, specifically the valvetrain, is completely new and state-of-the-art with on-demand Atkinson and Otto cycles -- Atkinson cycle for efficiency at lower engine speeds and Otto cycle for power at higher engine speeds. No other automaker in the world offers this type of valvetrain, not Audi, not BMW, not Mercedes-Benz.



The 5.0-litre V8 used in the original IS-F and the 5.0-litre V8 used in the RC-F (and upcoming LC) are different engines, with a completely new valvetrain (see above). The new V8 did not come out until it was first introduced in the RC-F in 2014; it was NOT offered in the 2012 IS-F. Unless you have driven the RC-F, you have not driven this new V8.



Fixed it for you. Turbos have been slapped on smaller-displacement engines in the hope that they will give the on-demand power of larger-displacement engines but the fuel efficiency of the smaller displacement engines when driven conservatively. They work for the EPA and European fuel economy cycles but, by-and-large, the fuel economy sticker numbers have not met real-life fuel consumption figures.
Stop spreading misinformation, its the same engine.with very minor updates, I wouldn't call a raised compression a new engine lol
doge is offline  
Old 12-07-15, 11:34 AM
  #1259  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by doge
Stop spreading misinformation, its the same engine.with very minor updates, I wouldn't call a raised compression a new engine lol

Stop accusing people of spreading misinformation if you do not know what you are talking about.

It is not just a greater compression ratio. The valvetrain is new. It allows the engine to run on the high-efficiency Atkinson cycle at low rpm and switches to normal Otto cycle at high rpm.

No other automaker has this on-demand switching between Atkinson and Otto cycles for efficiency and power.
Sulu is offline  
Old 12-07-15, 12:28 PM
  #1260  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
Stop accusing people of spreading misinformation if you do not know what you are talking about.

It is not just a greater compression ratio. The valvetrain is new. It allows the engine to run on the high-efficiency Atkinson cycle at low rpm and switches to normal Otto cycle at high rpm.

No other automaker has this on-demand switching between Atkinson and Otto cycles for efficiency and power.
Ford changed the valve train on the new coyote to bump a few hp, no one calls that almost a new engine. Its a minor hardware and software update... Even lexus uses the same engine code for it, why are you defending their actions?
doge is offline  


Quick Reply: Lexus LC News



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:20 PM.