Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

U.S. 2016 Lexus IS300 and RC300?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-01-15, 08:49 AM
  #166  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vladi
No Lexus, well that makes sense from BMWs point of view. Average or not it would still sell more than petrol counterpart but since hybrid is the only plan so far I guess we will never see the diesel option in L again for at least another generation
who knows... maybe there will be new generation small car diesels in few years.... they just released new truck diesels and "new" 1.4 D-4D... I would assume that we will get new 2.0d within 2 years.
spwolf is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 09:03 AM
  #167  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,057
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
thats pretty silly, if anything they should have more engines in their vehicles, not less. 3 series has 17 engines in Europe, and only 7 of those are available as AWD.
To have a brand new engine thats not compatible with AWD is embarrassing to say the least, not to mention highly inefficient.

I'm all for more engines but not ones that offer the same power and same fuel economy with no real difference than one being for RWD and the other AWD.
Bring back the ISF, IS hybrid etc - that would make more sense.....

3series sales worldwide can allow them to have 100 engines if they want.
IS and RC are low volume models by comparison.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 09:10 AM
  #168  
RNM GS3
Lexus Test Driver
 
RNM GS3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 7,057
Received 59 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Diesel350
Because they design, engineer and build all their turbos in house unlike the Germans who outsource all their turbos.
LOL

Ok so the turbo engines for M3, M5, M6, C63, E63, S63, S550, S600, S65, etc are all outsourced huh...
Well then maybe Lexus should get this amazing supplier bec they got Nothing that can compete with the engines of the models above.

Last edited by RNM GS3; 07-01-15 at 09:14 AM.
RNM GS3 is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 09:31 AM
  #169  
Mr. Burns
Lexus Champion
 
Mr. Burns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canuckistan
Posts: 1,874
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
Really?

So why are they 5-10yrs behind the Germans.
Lexus only has the 4cyl turbo now.
6 and 8 are few years away.

If its so easy to develop they would have done it much faster.

They focused way too much on Hybrids that dont sell.
Toyota/Lexus initially did not believe in FI, perhaps they misgauged it as a trend and are now getting (reluctantly) swept up in it as the industry marches more confidently in that direction.

Furthermore a Lexus is not a BMW, it has to adhere to certain parameters. A BMW or Audi can get away with oil consumption at the level of one quart every 600-700 miles on a brand new englne, it can get away with batteries that are woefully underengineered for the engine (some of the engines you mentioned above), resulting in manufacturer recommended replacements every oil change period due to underlying engineering flaws, it can get away with sounding like a milk truck at idle. It can get away with consistently below average dependability ratings.

A Lexus can't.

So in addition to being just powerful and efficient, any Lexus turbo will need to be very refined in terms of NVH and very durable - more than any other similar engine in its class. These are the difficult bits of engineering, others can skimp on it to march faster towards more power and variety, but Lexus can't.

Last edited by Mr. Burns; 07-01-15 at 09:35 AM.
Mr. Burns is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 09:57 AM
  #170  
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Mr Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr. Burns

So in addition to being just powerful and efficient, any Lexus turbo will need to be very refined in terms of NVH and very durable - more than any other similar engine in its class. These are the difficult bits of engineering, others can skimp on it to march faster towards more power and variety, but Lexus can't.
Well lets see about that, there are very few 2.0t out there so far, so let´s wait a year or two. We are seeing ( potential huge ) trouble with fuel pumps and some rear wing failures on the RC-F , typical BMW problems Just read in the RC-F fourm. The difference here is that BMW uses this kind of "hi-tec" technology on a regular car, and not a top end car that sells about 1000 units a year. And thats the real world diffenrence in terms of statistics, Lexus will never suffer in JD powers or other consumer reports for 1000 crappy fuelpumps , but if there was 1 000 000 units they would !
Mr Bond is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 11:11 AM
  #171  
Diesel350
Lexus Champion
 
Diesel350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 1,841
Received 74 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
LOL

Ok so the turbo engines for M3, M5, M6, C63, E63, S63, S550, S600, S65, etc are all outsourced huh...
Well then maybe Lexus should get this amazing supplier bec they got Nothing that can compete with the engines of the models above.
Yes REALLY they are outsourced!!

The M4 is fitted with a pair of Mitsubishi-sourced turbochargers.
http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...-and-info-news


Also look up Borg Warner who also develops turbochargers for the 3 and 5 series and many of the Mercedes AMG models.

And why should Lexus outsource their turbo's like it's German counterparts? So that they can consume and leak oil like crazy? Sure Lexus can't compete with Mercedes and BMW engines but who wants to fork out $12k to fix leaking oil from their turbos like my neighbor had to do.

Last edited by Diesel350; 07-01-15 at 12:03 PM.
Diesel350 is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 11:54 AM
  #172  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Toyota also outsourced turbos for previous turbo diesels, but new ones have all in-house built technology, including turbos.
spwolf is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 02:56 PM
  #173  
Vladi
Pole Position
 
Vladi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,665
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RNM GS3
LOL

Ok so the turbo engines for M3, M5, M6, C63, E63, S63, S550, S600, S65, etc are all outsourced huh...
Well then maybe Lexus should get this amazing supplier bec they got Nothing that can compete with the engines of the models above.
BMW loves Mitsu's turbos,so does VW.

First gen BMW turbos were all Mitsubishi, then they made their own but retained Mitsu turbos for high spec engines.

Its also very well known fact that quad turbo setup in Bugatti is all Mitsu as well
Vladi is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 03:44 PM
  #174  
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Mr Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Apparently many others as well

Currently, amongst others BMW, FIAT, FORD, GM, ISUZU, IVECO, PORSCHE, PSA, RENAULT, SAAB, VOLVO and VOLKSWAGEN are using MHI turbocharger technology.

http://www.mtee.eu/products/turbocharger/oem-sales

But honestly, I dont see the problem here. It makes no sense at all to spend millions to develop an already existing product. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Just like all 8 speed gearboxes in BMW and many others are ZF Friedrichshafen.
Mr Bond is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 05:01 PM
  #175  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Bond
Apparently many others as well

Currently, amongst others BMW, FIAT, FORD, GM, ISUZU, IVECO, PORSCHE, PSA, RENAULT, SAAB, VOLVO and VOLKSWAGEN are using MHI turbocharger technology.

http://www.mtee.eu/products/turbocharger/oem-sales

But honestly, I dont see the problem here. It makes no sense at all to spend millions to develop an already existing product. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Just like all 8 speed gearboxes in BMW and many others are ZF Friedrichshafen.
there is nothing wrong with using off the shelf parts... it is still better if you can research something your competitors dont have and beat them.
spwolf is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 07:16 PM
  #176  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,833
Received 104 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Interesting fact, according to Lexus UK specs, IS200t weight will start at 1590kg... thats 121lbs lighter than IS250 in the UK. Also between 180kg-270 kg (400-600lbs) lighter than NX 2.0t AWD. It is hard to figure exactly since in each country there is slightly different number.

So, IS 2.0t should be pretty quick, more than what official numbers in Europe suggest.
spwolf is offline  
Old 07-01-15, 09:27 PM
  #177  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
Interesting fact, according to Lexus UK specs, IS200t weight will start at 1590kg... thats 121lbs lighter than IS250 in the UK. Also between 180kg-270 kg (400-600lbs) lighter than NX 2.0t AWD. It is hard to figure exactly since in each country there is slightly different number.

So, IS 2.0t should be pretty quick, more than what official numbers in Europe suggest.
Agreed, should be pretty punchy
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 07-02-15, 06:49 AM
  #178  
JDR76
Lexus Champion
 
JDR76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: WA
Posts: 12,329
Received 1,603 Likes on 1,021 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
Interesting fact, according to Lexus UK specs, IS200t weight will start at 1590kg... thats 121lbs lighter than IS250 in the UK. Also between 180kg-270 kg (400-600lbs) lighter than NX 2.0t AWD. It is hard to figure exactly since in each country there is slightly different number.

So, IS 2.0t should be pretty quick, more than what official numbers in Europe suggest.
That's interesting. The European press release quoted 1590 kg (3505lbs). The US Lexus site quotes the RWD IS250 at 3461 lbs (1570 kg), meaning the IS200t is actually 44 lbs heavier than the IS250 it replaces, which seems odd to me. Not sure about transmission weights, but from what I can find online, the 2.0t engine weighs 14 pounds less than the 2.5l V6 (352lbs vs 366lbs).

The UK Lexus site states that the IS250 starts at 1555 kg (3428 lbs), or 77 lbs lighter than the IS200t.

Last edited by JDR76; 07-02-15 at 06:53 AM.
JDR76 is online now  
Old 07-02-15, 09:58 AM
  #179  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
who knows... maybe there will be new generation small car diesels in few years.... they just released new truck diesels and "new" 1.4 D-4D... I would assume that we will get new 2.0d within 2 years.

That's what I was thinking. Toyota just released new truck diesels; it would not be that costly to adapt them for cars (if they wanted to do that).

And there is so much talk about how Toyota now has access to Mazda's SkyActiv Diesel from their recent agreement. Personally, I don't think Toyota needs any Mazda engine technology but the auto bloggers sure think so.
Sulu is offline  
Old 07-02-15, 10:11 AM
  #180  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Bond
Apparently many others as well

Currently, amongst others BMW, FIAT, FORD, GM, ISUZU, IVECO, PORSCHE, PSA, RENAULT, SAAB, VOLVO and VOLKSWAGEN are using MHI turbocharger technology.

http://www.mtee.eu/products/turbocharger/oem-sales

But honestly, I dont see the problem here. It makes no sense at all to spend millions to develop an already existing product. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Just like all 8 speed gearboxes in BMW and many others are ZF Friedrichshafen.
Originally Posted by spwolf
there is nothing wrong with using off the shelf parts... it is still better if you can research something your competitors dont have and beat them.
No, there is no problem going with off-the-shelf parts, if there is something available out there that you need.

But by developing key components (such as transmissions) together with a preferred supplier (and in Toyota's case, there is nothing more preferred than a supplier within its own family of suppliers, such as Aisin) or even building it yourself (such as a turbocharger on an engine especially designed as a turbocharged engine), you get exactly what you want and what you need, especially when it comes to quality.

One of the Americans who helped build up Japanese industry in the post-war years supported a quality management principle that manufacturers should work closely with their suppliers in order to design and build products that met the manufacturer's needs, including and especially quality. Toyota has taken that principle to heart and they are now known as an auto manufacturer that works closely with their suppliers to develop products that Toyota needs, at the levels of quality that Toyota wants.
Sulu is offline  


Quick Reply: U.S. 2016 Lexus IS300 and RC300?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:50 PM.