Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

The "New" Lexus : are you no longer its target market?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-15, 02:00 PM
  #166  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,843
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Peteharvey - thanks a lot for the work.

I feel pretty confident that Lexus will keep doing different grilles for different vehicles... They all look similar but at the same time, each car gets something unique... like new 6.5ES front lights.
spwolf is online now  
Old 04-15-15, 06:02 PM
  #167  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markneups
Sorry but you get a better overall experience with a 35K GM or Ford product.
In several cases, that's true......but you don't necessarily get a better experience with a 50K or higher GM product. Lexus may have cheapened the ES and IS over the years, but it still does a pretty good job on the GS and (especially) the LS.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-15-15, 09:47 PM
  #168  
sojah
Lead Lap
iTrader: (1)
 
sojah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: JP (oki to be precise :D)
Posts: 4,918
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i would not buy a GM over a luxury japanese sedan, wait is cadillac GM?

i have often asked my friends and co-workers what type of american car they would pick if there were no japanese cars/trucks available at all,, i know hypothetically. my answer is a cadillac, what say you¿
sojah is offline  
Old 04-15-15, 11:57 PM
  #169  
G Star
Lexus Test Driver
iTrader: (2)
 
G Star's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: California
Posts: 6,972
Received 47 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
wow, you cant really make these things up, can you? Congrats.
He's willing to say anything to make his point. I wonder when grandma is getting thrown under the bus.
G Star is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 04:51 AM
  #170  
markneups
Driver School Candidate
 
markneups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SW13GS
It depends on the model. I think the 4GS is a big improvement over the 3GS, I think the refreshed LS is a huge improvement over the pre-refreshed LS460 in that same department. ES I agree material quality isn't as good as it was. The new RX looks to be a big improvement in interior material and product quality regardless of what your opinion is on styling.

"Horrid"? I think thats a little extreme. You hate the new styling, thats obvious. I think you're letting your vitriol over the styling impact your opinions on the quality of the product overall.
I know I do have opinions. I can't shed any light on the GS or LS. I have never considered one and never even looked at either. The 2015 RX450h is my current vehicle and I love everything about it. The total package from style to fit and finish is why this is my second RX. As far a quality interior--- I have seldom seen any vehicle that I like better in this price range of high $50's. Lexus RX style and quality went out with a Big Bang with this last current style --2015-- the 2016 style and quality and in my opinion poor, cheap quality-- is why I'm glad I bought the 2015. I can honestly tell you I would never look at the 2016 as something I would want. Style--no like--- quality-- cheap plastic wheel inserts,harder uncomfortable seats,way to busy "for my taste anyway-- interior and the close resemblance to the Rav 4 and equally unattractive NX. I will be driving my 2015 for quite awhile unless Lexus comes to its senses or I decide to look elsewhere.
markneups is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 05:49 AM
  #171  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markneups
I know I do have opinions. I can't shed any light on the GS or LS. I have never considered one and never even looked at either. The 2015 RX450h is my current vehicle and I love everything about it. The total package from style to fit and finish is why this is my second RX. As far a quality interior--- I have seldom seen any vehicle that I like better in this price range of high $50's. Lexus RX style and quality went out with a Big Bang with this last current style --2015-- the 2016 style and quality and in my opinion poor, cheap quality-- is why I'm glad I bought the 2015. I can honestly tell you I would never look at the 2016 as something I would want. Style--no like--- quality-- cheap plastic wheel inserts,harder uncomfortable seats,way to busy "for my taste anyway-- interior and the close resemblance to the Rav 4 and equally unattractive NX. I will be driving my 2015 for quite awhile unless Lexus comes to its senses or I decide to look elsewhere.

You certainly have strong opinions about the 2016 RX. Have you driven one or at least spent some significant amount of time sitting in one and poking around in it?

If not, tell me how you can rate the 2016 RX as the worst thing yet just by looking at grainy autoshow photos?
Sulu is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 06:13 AM
  #172  
evident
Racer
 
evident's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 1,381
Received 76 Likes on 62 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
In several cases, that's true......but you don't necessarily get a better experience with a 50K or higher GM product. Lexus may have cheapened the ES and IS over the years, but it still does a pretty good job on the GS and (especially) the LS.
not really sure how they cheapened the IS over the years as far as material quality is conerned. Sitting in a 2 IS vs a 3 IS is night and day. I can maybe agree with not allowing certain options in the F-sport such as cooled seats and heated steering wheel, but overall the 3IS is the best IS ever so far. I might agree that the 3rd gen RX isn't much better quality than a 2nd gen RX.

I can't speak for the ES since i've only sat in them in passing.
evident is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 06:43 AM
  #173  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evident
not really sure how they cheapened the IS over the years as far as material quality is conerned. Sitting in a 2 IS vs a 3 IS is night and day. I can maybe agree with not allowing certain options in the F-sport such as cooled seats and heated steering wheel, but overall the 3IS is the best IS ever so far. I might agree that the 3rd gen RX isn't much better quality than a 2nd gen RX.
While the 3IS is not a bad car overall by any means (actually pretty decent in some areas like powertrain refinement), what I was referring to was less of a feeling of solidity of sheet metal, hardware, trim, etc....between the 2 and 3Gen,and, at least IMO, a general cheapening of the look and feel of the interior trim. Between the 1 Gen model (which I owned) and the 2Gen, there was improvement in some areas and deterioration in others.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 06:45 AM
  #174  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,610
Received 2,520 Likes on 1,818 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markneups
The 2015 RX450h is my current vehicle and I love everything about it. The total package from style to fit and finish is why this is my second RX. As far a quality interior--- I have seldom seen any vehicle that I like better in this price range of high $50's.
IMHO the current RX interior is terrible from a quality perspective. I've had them as loaners, and considered them before we got our Jeeps. Hard plastic everywhere, most notably on the center console and my hands and fingernails grate over it when I'm using the shifter, etc, terrible. IMHO the 2013-2015 ES has a nicer interior. I'm not being mean, thats 100% how I feel. The Highlander has a much better quality interior than the 2010-2015 RX.

I can't shed any light on the GS or LS. I have never considered one and never even looked at either.
Then now can you make blanket statements about Lexus quality from one model?

,harder uncomfortable seats.
There goes all your credibility LOL. Nobody has sat in the new RX's seats, certainly not you as you're not a member of the automotive press. Yet, you say the seats are harder and uncomfortable.

You're looking for reasons not to like it.

I get it, you like your 2015. Go post in the 2015 forums and stop harassing everybody who is trying to talk about the 2016

Last edited by SW17LS; 04-16-15 at 07:02 AM.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 08:55 AM
  #175  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,770
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markneups
The 2015 RX450h is my current vehicle and I love everything about it. The total package from style to fit and finish is why this is my second RX. As far a quality interior--- I have seldom seen any vehicle that I like better in this price range of high $50's.
of course style is personal, but a 2015 rx interior imo doesn't hold a candle to my 2015 jeep grand cherokee summit interior.
http://www.jeep.com/en/grand-cherokee/interior/

the 2016 style and quality and in my opinion poor, cheap quality--
what do you base this on?
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 10:15 AM
  #176  
Jacket
Intermediate
 
Jacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 443
Received 135 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Maybe you can "blame" Lexus for the perceived quality reductions, and so of it could be valid, but I'm a firm believer that they are falling victim (like many car makers) of the excessive government intervention in the automotive industry. The overbuilding/engineering (whatever you want to call it) we saw in the 90's and early 2000's will never happen again as long as we have all the restrictions on the auto industry that the US government is forcing (not the consumer - the government). It is more expensive to build cars to meet the stiffer regulations, and as a result Toyota has to cheapen/lighten in other areas to compensate.

Toyota/Lexus didn't get to the top of the vehicular food chain because it was the most luxurious vehicle available, or the sexiest. It got here because of the quality, affordability and reliability legacy that resulted in cars that had more strength and durability than most of its competitors. Resale values were incredible, so the "investment" in a Toyota/Lexus was a safe choice for most folks. Unfortunately, they cannot follow their own legacy because the government feels like it should micromanage the industry rather than letter the people drive the direction.
Jacket is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 11:27 AM
  #177  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,843
Received 110 Likes on 81 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jacket
Maybe you can "blame" Lexus for the perceived quality reductions, and so of it could be valid, but I'm a firm believer that they are falling victim (like many car makers) of the excessive government intervention in the automotive industry. The overbuilding/engineering (whatever you want to call it) we saw in the 90's and early 2000's will never happen again as long as we have all the restrictions on the auto industry that the US government is forcing (not the consumer - the government). It is more expensive to build cars to meet the stiffer regulations, and as a result Toyota has to cheapen/lighten in other areas to compensate.

Toyota/Lexus didn't get to the top of the vehicular food chain because it was the most luxurious vehicle available, or the sexiest. It got here because of the quality, affordability and reliability legacy that resulted in cars that had more strength and durability than most of its competitors. Resale values were incredible, so the "investment" in a Toyota/Lexus was a safe choice for most folks. Unfortunately, they cannot follow their own legacy because the government feels like it should micromanage the industry rather than letter the people drive the direction.
your post is 10 years late, thats when lighter/cheaper interiors started... now with new RX, it is moving to much much nicer materials and build, something that RX never had before.
spwolf is online now  
Old 04-16-15, 11:37 AM
  #178  
Jacket
Intermediate
 
Jacket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 443
Received 135 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Three posts prior to yours, the RX interior got a completely opposite review.
Jacket is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 12:15 PM
  #179  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,610
Received 2,520 Likes on 1,818 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jacket
Three posts prior to yours, the RX interior got a completely opposite review.
By someone who has never seen it or sat in it LOL

You have to consider the source. No review of the 4RX discusses low quality interior issues.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 04-16-15, 12:18 PM
  #180  
markneups
Driver School Candidate
 
markneups's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: New York
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
You certainly have strong opinions about the 2016 RX. Have you driven one or at least spent some significant amount of time sitting in one and poking around in it?

If not, tell me how you can rate the 2016 RX as the worst thing yet just by looking at grainy autoshow photos?
Yes you could be correct. I might be premature. From what I have been told the NX is just a smaller version of the new RX. Photos would back me up on that. Friends from Singapore also sent me videos of the new RX weeks before it was introduced here. They pretty much were my eyes and ears. Let me tell you--- this vehicle is going over like a lead balloon overseas. Rumor has it the vehicle could possibly be changed to a less dramatic posture before they are released. But--- just rumor from Singapore. I don't think that will happen so soon. Possibly mid year though.
markneups is offline  


Quick Reply: The "New" Lexus : are you no longer its target market?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:15 PM.