Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

The Car "Wardrobe"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-29-15, 08:24 AM
  #1  
gyrase321
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
gyrase321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The Car "Wardrobe"

Do you have a car "wardrobe"? This is a collection of cars that you keep whereby each car serves a different purpose and is driven on different occasions. For example:

1. daily driver: a safe, reliable, low cost to maintain sedan or compact SUV (e.g. Subaru Legacy, Camry, Accord, Mazda 6)

2. volume hauler/off-roader: a large SUV, minivan, or truck (eg. Toyota 4 runner, Land Cruiser, Toyota Sienna, F-150)

3. party car: luxury sedan/SUV for attending formal events, weddings, going to the opera (if you're into that) = Lexus LS, MB S-class, Panamera, Bentley, Escalade

4. fun car: sports car, convertible, or muscle car for weekend use (e.g. Porsche 911, RCF, M4, Corvette, Hellcat, GTR)

Many cars straddle across these categories. The Lexus IS 350 can be used as a daily driver but may also be considered a fun car. The Porsche Macan can be a daily driver, a hauler, and a fun car. The Escalade can be a hauler as well as a party car. I'm not sure I buy into this approach. I would rather have cars/vehicles that have specific functions and are used for specific occasions. Thoughts?
gyrase321 is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 08:48 AM
  #2  
doge
Formerly Bad Co
 
doge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think most people refer to what's in the fleet as they're stable.
doge is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 09:36 AM
  #3  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Never heard of nor would I use the term 'wardrobe' for automobiles. Always stable.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 10:41 AM
  #4  
gyrase321
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
gyrase321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I see your point although in the context of this thread, wardrobe is exactly the concept I want to convey....in the sense that a wardrobe provides a person a different "outfit" for a different occasion. "Stable" is just a collection of cars (or horses) with no implied differentiation in purpose, beside racing perhaps.

Last edited by gyrase321; 03-29-15 at 11:52 AM.
gyrase321 is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 11:19 AM
  #5  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,494
Received 2,500 Likes on 1,803 Posts
Default

Not really. I do like having two types of vehicles in the household. For instance, I wouldn't want to own two sedans. I like having a luxury sedan for every day and work (I drive a lot for work) and an SUV for trips, weekends, hauling stuff, bad weather, etc.

Now that we have kids the SUV will likely get replaced with a minivan, but the idea is the same.

I love cars but I don't see the value in having a car without a driver to drive it daily, so no third car for me.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 11:40 AM
  #6  
gyrase321
Pole Position
Thread Starter
 
gyrase321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: IL
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The reason for this thread is that I have noticed car magazines and blogs rank cars that really shouldn't be ranked in the same category since they don't serve the same function. For instance, Car and Driver ranks the BMW X5 higher than the Lexus GX based mainly on the criterion of "sportiness" or being "fun to drive". But the GX isn't supposed to be a sporty vehicle. It is a luxury volume hauler/off-roader, and a mighty reliable one at that. This faulty analysis is I suspect the result of the magazine's inability (intentionally or unintentionally) to conceptualize cars as tools having different functions. Or, in the metaphor of wardrobes, as clothes intended for different occasions. Car and Driver writers (and Jalopnik, et al) seem to think that all cars should be sporty and fun to drive.....or that we should all be wearing shorts and running shoes to the opera.
gyrase321 is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 11:47 AM
  #7  
Hoovey689
Moderator
iTrader: (16)
 
Hoovey689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: California
Posts: 42,283
Received 122 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

If you break it down in the most simple of terms both GX and X5 can be had with V8, 7-seats, 4WD/AWD and plenty of cushion and amenities. Their 'missions' may be different but some key similarities result in a comparison test whether that's right or wrong.
Hoovey689 is offline  
Old 03-29-15, 11:56 AM
  #8  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,494
Received 2,500 Likes on 1,803 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gyrase321
For instance, Car and Driver ranks the BMW X5 higher than the Lexus GX based mainly on the criterion of "sportiness" or being "fun to drive". But the GX isn't supposed to be a sporty vehicle. It is a luxury volume hauler/off-roader, and a mighty reliable one at that. This faulty analysis is I suspect the result of the magazine's inability (intentionally or unintentionally) to conceptualize cars as tools having different functions. Or, in the metaphor of wardrobes, as clothes intended for different occasions. Car and Driver writers (and Jalopnik, et al) seem to think that all cars should be sporty and fun to drive.....or that we should all be wearing shorts and running shoes to the opera.
I think what you're missing is most people cannot afford to purchase multiple vehicles to fit multiple needs. The VAST majority can not, including people who spend 60-70-80k on a vehicle. Because of that, most people have to buy a vehicle that is a compromise, something that fits many of their wants while also suiting their needs.

For instance, someone who wants a sporty car and also needs to tow a small boat or wave runners, etc. They can't afford to purchase a GX and a BMW 530 M Sport. But, they can afford to purchase an X5. Its a compromise.

Thats why Car & Driver rates cars that are a little different but are still within the same category together as opposed to separately. Someone spending $60-70k on an SUV is going to consider both those vehicles, and whichever one they choose is going to depend on whether their need is greater than their want. Car & Driver is not meant to be unbiased. Reviews are never unbiased, their subscribers pay for their opinions of which vehicles are best. So its not a faulty analysis.

I too would rate an X5 over a GX...but...I don't need to tow or go offroad. Most people don't...

Last edited by SW17LS; 03-29-15 at 12:02 PM.
SW17LS is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 07:46 AM
  #9  
T0ked
Lexus Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
T0ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yup, refer to it as my stable. My FJ is my bad weather, off road, hauler, drive-and-park in NYC car. My mini is the everyday commuter car (30 miles round trip, this replaced my SC effectively) and my S is the weekend, jaunts out to Hamptons car. But they all get used interchangeably every now and then.

I agree that sometimes the comparisons are confusing at times. I also think this refers most to SUVs since that segment still seems to be evolving. The sedan segments seem more mature and set in their categories. The "compromise" segments are solidly their own segments now (want a sports car, luxury cruiser, inclement weather vehicle? There are myriads to choose from) When buying my FJ, I xshopped lots of unrelated vehicles (from highlander to range rover to Honda). I preferred to buy more task specific vehicles when purchasing.

Last edited by T0ked; 03-30-15 at 07:59 AM.
T0ked is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 01:05 PM
  #10  
Levi68
Pole Position
 
Levi68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Prague
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gyrase321
Do you have a car "wardrobe"? This is a collection of cars that you keep whereby each car serves a different purpose and is driven on different occasions. For example:

1. daily driver: a safe, reliable, low cost to maintain sedan or compact SUV (e.g. Subaru Legacy, Camry, Accord, Mazda 6)

2. volume hauler/off-roader: a large SUV, minivan, or truck (eg. Toyota 4 runner, Land Cruiser, Toyota Sienna, F-150)

3. party car: luxury sedan/SUV for attending formal events, weddings, going to the opera (if you're into that) = Lexus LS, MB S-class, Panamera, Bentley, Escalade

4. fun car: sports car, convertible, or muscle car for weekend use (e.g. Porsche 911, RCF, M4, Corvette, Hellcat, GTR)

Many cars straddle across these categories. The Lexus IS 350 can be used as a daily driver but may also be considered a fun car. The Porsche Macan can be a daily driver, a hauler, and a fun car. The Escalade can be a hauler as well as a party car. I'm not sure I buy into this approach. I would rather have cars/vehicles that have specific functions and are used for specific occasions. Thoughts?
Totally agree with your point, it is also my point. I just am too poor to have a car "wardrobe", and that is the bad thing. If you can only afford one car financially, then you either don't have the cars for the other occasions, or have to make to many compromises. The Porsche Macan is the best example: Jack of all trades, master of none.

This reminds me the 4P's, in this the 4C's: daily car, utility car, status car, fun car. But as every theory evolves, there is yet the 5th C: race car. I know some will add "bike".
Levi68 is offline  
Old 03-30-15, 03:17 PM
  #11  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Unless you live in an urban environment where you literally cannot park two cars, anybody can own a 2nd car/beater. Granted it might be a piece of junk, but my $600 Toyota truck has served me well for the past 4 years and 20,000 miles. Its handy to have something you can just climb into all nasty/sweaty/dirty, haul mulch, haul greasy car parts, drive in the snow, park on the street in ****ty neighborhoods, etc. If you scratch it or dent it who cares.
Aron9000 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rai
Car Chat
17
03-30-14 10:56 AM
I8ABMR
Car Chat
17
02-20-09 07:16 AM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
12
04-16-07 09:45 PM
GFerg
Car Chat
2
11-11-06 11:15 AM
Gojirra99
Car Chat
10
10-28-06 01:10 AM



Quick Reply: The Car "Wardrobe"



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:26 PM.