Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Study finds nine models with zero driver fatalities

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-01-15, 11:19 AM
  #31  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
True, but there are a surprising number of new-car buyers who have little or no idea what they're doing. Anyone, though, it seems, with a normal mind, who has had primary or secondary school and even the most rudimentary introduction to physics, should be able to put a simple 2 and 2 together and see that a major impact in a Smart-for-Two with a larger vehicle, even with its hyped Mercedes safety-engineering, is not going to be good news.
That is making a mighty big assumption. It may be obvious to us car enthusiasts here, who have done a lot of reading and viewed many videos of car crash tests, but it is definitely NOT that obvious to the average car buyer, unless they have been told about, and shown evidence of, real crash tests. And physics is an incredibly difficult subject for the average person to understand.

And there is a lot of misinformation being thrown around about how unsafe the Smart fortwo is (perhaps being thrown around by people who neither understand it nor like it). Yes, it is an incredibly small car but the tridion safety cell makes it incredibly crashworthy.
Sulu is offline  
Old 02-01-15, 11:19 AM
  #32  
J.P.
Boardroom Thug

 
J.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Treasury
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Have to agree with Bit, and this is being in Detroit , it's usually older males in the Stang's, most kids I see are in Eco boxes and suv-cuv's, just because 2 kids in Stang's cut you off isn't a micro trend, you made it a stereotype
J.P. is offline  
Old 02-01-15, 01:16 PM
  #33  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,762
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,378 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Well, bit, I'll respect your opinion and your experience, but, if I had a dollar, over the years, for every time I saw some idiot in a Mustang GT, SVT, or Cobra cut me or someone else off with some idiotic or dangerous high-speed maneuver, or a dollar for every Mustang-driving young kid in the newspaper whose parents will never see them again, or not see them in one piece, I could probably buy a Mustang with it.
i think that might have been true 20 years ago when 'kids' got used mustangs based on the ancient crap fox platform, but that's definitely not the case today in my experience. and thankfully most of those old mustangs have gone to the scrap heap.

when was the last time you saw a dangerous maneuver from a mustang driver?
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 02-01-15, 01:22 PM
  #34  
J.P.
Boardroom Thug

 
J.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Treasury
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
i think that might have been true 20 years ago when 'kids' got used mustangs based on the ancient crap fox platform, but that's definitely not the case today in my experience. and thankfully most of those old mustangs have gone to the scrap heap.

when was the last time you saw a dangerous maneuver from a mustang driver?
He did say newspaper, they stopped printing those around the 1999
J.P. is offline  
Old 02-01-15, 05:22 PM
  #35  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
That is making a mighty big assumption. It may be obvious to us car enthusiasts here, who have done a lot of reading and viewed many videos of car crash tests, but it is definitely NOT that obvious to the average car buyer, unless they have been told about, and shown evidence of, real crash tests. And physics is an incredibly difficult subject for the average person to understand.
No, I disagree.....it's not a big assumption at all, and I stand by what I said. The simple type of science taught in virtually every American grade school is more than enough for even those in primary and middle school to understand that when a big car hits a little car, the big car usually wins. It doesn't take an auto enthusiast to understand that....and that is taught even in basic driving courses.

Now, having said that, I'll agree that the Smart may be comparably safe for its size, with the Mercedes-engineered safety-roll cage, but even that only goes so far if and when you have a serious accident in a Smart.


Last edited by mmarshall; 02-01-15 at 05:29 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-01-15, 05:38 PM
  #36  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
Have to agree with Bit, and this is being in Detroit , it's usually older males in the Stang's, most kids I see are in Eco boxes and suv-cuv's, just because 2 kids in Stang's cut you off isn't a micro trend, you made it a stereotype

I wasn't necessarily trying to build a stereotype, as I noted in my posts that there ARE responsible Mustang drivers. But I've seen a lot of Mustang V8 jocks do a lot of very stupid things....sometimes surviving them, sometimes not. Enough, in my case, to at least see somewhat of a pattern.

However, you're correct that the very latest generation of high-school kids don't seem as interested in high-powered pony cars as those up to just a few years ago. In fact, a number of today's kids aren't interested in cars at all.....they're too busy with their electronic toys, and prefer to let Mom and Dad the driving while they text all day.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-01-15, 05:43 PM
  #37  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
He did say newspaper, they stopped printing those around the 1999
Sorry, i was unclear on that. When I used the term "newspaper", I meant the media in general........including the Internet.

You'd be surprised, though, at how many paper copies the Washington Post and New York Times still sell....even with today's 24/7 electronic media. Both of those papers have an enormous circulation....have for decades.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-03-15, 12:13 PM
  #38  
rxonmymind
Lexus Test Driver
 
rxonmymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,252
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
He did say newspaper, they stopped printing those around the 1999
Bwhahaha! Too funny
rxonmymind is offline  
Old 02-03-15, 01:48 PM
  #39  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rxonmymind
Bwhahaha! Too funny
More of them are still in print than you think.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-03-15, 02:56 PM
  #40  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,762
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,378 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
More of them are still in print than you think.
yeah the wall st. journal just started sending a daily copy to me (i never asked for it). they go straight in the recycling.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 02-03-15, 04:58 PM
  #41  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
yeah the wall st. journal just started sending a daily copy to me (i never asked for it). they go straight in the recycling.
I get the same thing every once in a while (unrequested copies) from the Washington Post and Washington Times. Like you, I don't usually read paper copes (except to do the crossword puzzles and word-games). But the point is that just because you and I don't read paper copies, many people in fact still still DO.....especially daily bus and subway commuters. Every evening, the floors of our Metro subway trains are littered with that day's newspapers that people read and just toss aside when they're done......just like slobs.

Anyhow, getting back to topic...........

when was the last time you saw a dangerous maneuver from a mustang driver?
Just a couple of days ago. Watched somebody in a gray Mustang GT (didn't get a good look at the driver), on the Interstate, pass someone on the shoulder at high speed and cut back in front of him. Not only was a risky maneuver, but also tossed up some gravel from the shoulder which could ding/chip his own paint job and others around him.

Last edited by mmarshall; 02-03-15 at 05:08 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 02-03-15, 11:12 PM
  #42  
rxonmymind
Lexus Test Driver
 
rxonmymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,252
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
More of them are still in print than you think.
Keep believing that. Like Bigfoot sightings...
rxonmymind is offline  
Old 02-03-15, 11:22 PM
  #43  
rxonmymind
Lexus Test Driver
 
rxonmymind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,252
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
That is making a mighty big assumption. It may be obvious to us car enthusiasts here, who have done a lot of reading and viewed many videos of car crash tests, but it is definitely NOT that obvious to the average car buyer, unless they have been told about, and shown evidence of, real crash tests. And physics is an incredibly difficult subject for the average person to understand.

And there is a lot of misinformation being thrown around about how unsafe the Smart fortwo is (perhaps being thrown around by people who neither understand it nor like it). Yes, it is an incredibly small car but the tridion safety cell makes it incredibly crashworthy.
I can make an INDESTRUCTIBLE crash cell however, when that 1800lb car meets and 3500- 4500 lb vehicle and stop from 70-0 then bounces off like a rubber ball it's not the vehicle that you have to worry about. YOUR body will NOT live decelerating from 70-0 mph. Your internal organs, neck, brain etc will still be traveling at 70. But your car door will still open & look pretty. What a load of crap & half truth their selling about the smart car.
rxonmymind is offline  
Old 02-04-15, 06:00 AM
  #44  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rxonmymind
Keep believing that. Like Bigfoot sightings...
Go take a look at one of our D.C. Metro Subway cars.....then come back and tell me I'm living in Fantasyland.

Originally Posted by rxonmymind
I can make an INDESTRUCTIBLE crash cell however, when that 1800lb car meets and 3500- 4500 lb vehicle and stop from 70-0 then bounces off like a rubber ball it's not the vehicle that you have to worry about. YOUR body will NOT live decelerating from 70-0 mph. Your internal organs, neck, brain etc will still be traveling at 70. But your car door will still open & look pretty. What a load of crap & half truth their selling about the smart car.
I will, however, agree with you on this point. There is only so much you can do to make a small microcar safe in a major impact, even with the vaunted Mercedes engineering. Then you run into a simple and inconvenient truth called the laws of physics.

Last edited by mmarshall; 02-04-15 at 06:05 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gojirra99
Car Chat
10
10-28-06 01:10 AM
PsychDoc
ES - 5th Gen (2007-2012)
1
07-30-06 12:03 AM



Quick Reply: Study finds nine models with zero driver fatalities



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:48 AM.