GS F (2016-present) Discussion topics related to the GS F model

Lexus debuts 2016 GS F

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-15, 03:26 PM
  #76  
DrRick
Lexus Champion
 
DrRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,395
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna



really? so should the rc-f be the rc500 f-sport too?
Not at all. The RCF has horsepower on par with its 'targets that aren't really targets'.

I really don't know where Lexus is trying to take this F brand. They started off great with the LFA and ISF. But then they castrate the IS in the eyes of the general public with the F Sport options. I know that bmw has the M Sport like...but they don't have identical badges save for some different colors.

Then comes the RCF. A chance a fantastic high performance coupe. But it comes in 2-300 lbs over weight. Now, the GSF nails the weight part but it comes in underpowered vs its 'perceived' M/AMG/RS/V counterparts. I don't get why they are playing this game halfway.

I guess the GS400 spoiled me 😢
Old 01-06-15, 03:27 PM
  #77  
BNR34
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
BNR34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,858
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
I will just guess you never shopped for cars in this price range, while a lot of 35k A4 buyers take whatever is on the lot for a $399 lease I am not convinced people buying an S6 or GS-F are completely buying blind. The higher the cost, often the picker the people as luxury is getting what you want and while some people don't care or may be lazy, they are not stupid, I guess only a handful are as smart as you
I personally know and seen many people who buy very expensive fast luxury cars that are pretty clueless about cars. Having money and the desire for a fast luxury car don't make them know cars

Originally Posted by J.P.
I see pretty well as the S4 is a sedan and the M3 is a coupe . If you want to compare the S\RS5 go ahead, just start another thread.

Errr thinking of the old M3
Even the old ones got 4 doors
Attached Thumbnails Lexus debuts 2016 GS F-2015-bmw-m3-sedan-fd.jpg   Lexus debuts 2016 GS F-01_bmw-m3_facelift1.jpg   Lexus debuts 2016 GS F-5981775833_14bf9f00ae_b.jpg  
Old 01-06-15, 03:27 PM
  #78  
Mr Bond
Pole Position
 
Mr Bond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: europe
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think Chris Harris pretty much nails it about the F brand here ( RC-F test )

"Lexus has probably arrived at a 2014 party in 2008 clothes, but the RC F still has something about it. And it's not German, which for some people will be enough on its own"

This GS-F will probably be very nice to drive and have a beautiful sound, but there is really no market for it. It does not compete with M5 or AMG and the BMW 550i and similar cars are comfort cars with powerful, smooth and quiet engines. People do not buy a loaded 550i to be "sporty" or race it.
Old 01-06-15, 03:34 PM
  #79  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,670
Received 184 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DrRick
I guess the GS400 spoiled me 😢
in a way, yeah

but i do think isf and rcf were/are executed pretty well
Old 01-06-15, 03:39 PM
  #80  
DrRick
Lexus Champion
 
DrRick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: ATL
Posts: 3,395
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rominl
in a way, yeah

but i do think isf and rcf were/are executed pretty well
yeah...as you can see in my sig, im a fan of the ISF. if only folks would stop asking if its an F Sport
Old 01-06-15, 03:44 PM
  #81  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,760
Received 2,126 Likes on 1,378 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gojirra99
You are totally confused,
thanks.

the RC F has MORE hp than the M4 it is competing against but is of course a few hundred pounds heavier, but performance is very close. The RC F is a deserving and bona fide M4 competitor, can't say the same for this GSF, it only closely competes with E550 AMG sport and 550i sport.
it's only confusing IF you ever expected the gs-f to compete with an E63 or M5 which was NEVER EVER going to happen, so if i'm confused, then you and others are delusional.

my point is the gs-f is basically a 4 door rc-f and if the rc-f is cool then the gs-f should be viewed as cool too. even if it had E63 type performance it would be blown away by a dodge hellcat. yeah a hellcat is no luxury vehicle, but really... mercedes and bmw sell a TINY number of e63/m5's and lexus isn't into selling tiny numbers, except for the lfa.

it's important to remember than neither bmw nor mercedes ever offered anything quite like the lfa. (yes they've both had or have supercars, but the lfa is very unique)

It's way better to shine against these cars as a GS500 F-Sport than to wear the GS F badge and be badly outgunned by the E63, M5 and the 640hp CTS-V.
i guess, if stupid letters and numbers are important to you. how about calling it a gs400 super f-sport plus, then it will be even more impressive against 550i/e550.

This GS may possibly be more fun to drive to some, but in this class of cars it's way more than that
lexus marches to its own drummer. they built an original LS like nothing else. they built an original RX like nothing else. they built an LFA like nothing else. most of the rest is filling in the gaps or re-using other models (altezza, soarer, es/avalon), etc.

there would be no F division at all had not some renegede engineers built an IS F prototype.

heck some may think even a miata is more fun than them all ...
not sure if serious or if that was a jab ... most agree that driving a slow car fast is generally way more fun than driving a fast car slow.

back to this gs-f - it was entirely obvious that the car would come out like this, and it's still a great addition to the lexus line-up. those who want lexus to have direct competitors to the german big three are likely to be disappointed over and over. just because reviews and the internetz have decided the rc-f is a direct competitor to the m4 doesn't mean lexus is committed in that direction. the 'regular' rc for example, is basically NOTHING like a 4 series and the IS is pretty much nothing like the compact german sedans which are by and large very conservative.
Old 01-06-15, 03:45 PM
  #82  
SNiiP3R
Lead Lap
iTrader: (3)
 
SNiiP3R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Fuhgeddaboudit
Posts: 4,086
Received 34 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Well, this just proves that Lexus is really behind in the engine department. They should have kept this car for the next gen and debut it with the new engine and some serious hp numbers. I mean seriously, M5 10 years ago had more hp than this car. I agree with others, why call it a GS-F and ruin the F brand, just name it GS500 and call it a day.
Old 01-06-15, 03:46 PM
  #83  
TF109B
Lexus Champion
 
TF109B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Washington
Posts: 2,266
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Bond
I think Chris Harris pretty much nails it about the F brand here ( RC-F test )

"Lexus has probably arrived at a 2014 party in 2008 clothes, but the RC F still has something about it. And it's not German, which for some people will be enough on its own"

This GS-F will probably be very nice to drive and have a beautiful sound, but there is really no market for it. It does not compete with M5 or AMG and the BMW 550i and similar cars are comfort cars with powerful, smooth and quiet engines. People do not buy a loaded 550i to be "sporty" or race it.
Who cares what journalists say? Why the need for 640hp? Why even 540hp? Youre at a level in these sedans where more and more power will turn into a "who's bigger" argument. I dont see how this car should be called something other than an "F". Because its not as powerful? Well then even the Germans fall short since the CTS-V is ~640-650hp level. Another thing is the engine sharing with the RC F. Well that CTS uses a Vette engine, so what?
Old 01-06-15, 03:48 PM
  #84  
SW17LS
Lexus Fanatic
 
SW17LS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 55,601
Received 2,520 Likes on 1,818 Posts
Default

I gotta admit, I'm disappointed in the decision to just put the RC-F's engine in the car too. Even if they had boosted it to 485 or 487 at least they could say they retuned the engine for more power...like they said they would. I'm sure it will drive great, but I don't think theres any getting around that power output is a disappointment.

I need to see it in person, and in another color I think. I love USB on the IS and RC, but for some reason its not doing it for me on the GS...
Old 01-06-15, 03:52 PM
  #85  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
mercedes and bmw sell a TINY number of e63/m5's and lexus isn't into selling tiny numbers, except for the lfa.
Well given typical GS sales numbers, do you really think the GS-F is going to bring in big numbers? I doubt they're going to sell that many of these.


Originally Posted by bitkahuna
it's important to remember than neither bmw nor mercedes ever offered anything quite like the lfa. (yes they've both had or have supercars, but the lfa is very unique)
Mercedes made CLK-GTR's for road use. Can't say Lexus did that.




Originally Posted by bitkahuna
back to this gs-f - it was entirely obvious that the car would come out like this, and it's still a great addition to the lexus line-up. those who want lexus to have direct competitors to the german big three are likely to be disappointed over and over. just because reviews and the internetz have decided the rc-f is a direct competitor to the m4 doesn't mean lexus is committed in that direction. the 'regular' rc for example, is basically NOTHING like a 4 series and the IS is pretty much nothing like the compact german sedans which are by and large very conservative.
Are you insinuating the RC-F isn't a direct competitor to the M4? RC not like a 4-series? Outside of styling the IS and the RC line up pretty damn well with the Germans.

I do agree Lexus is doing their own thing with this GS-F but I think it's more because they don't have the firepower right now.
Old 01-06-15, 03:56 PM
  #86  
rominl
exclusive matchup

iTrader: (4)
 
rominl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lovely OC
Posts: 81,670
Received 184 Likes on 143 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
it's only confusing IF you ever expected the gs-f to compete with an E63 or M5 which was NEVER EVER going to happen, so if i'm confused, then you and others are delusional.

my point is the gs-f is basically a 4 door rc-f and if the rc-f is cool then the gs-f should be viewed as cool too. even if it had E63 type performance it would be blown away by a dodge hellcat. yeah a hellcat is no luxury vehicle, but really... mercedes and bmw sell a TINY number of e63/m5's and lexus isn't into selling tiny numbers, except for the lfa.
paul, i am not sure if i understand why it was never going to happen? if lexus can build the isf and rcf to be competitive against m3 and c63, why not in the mid-size game?

and i cannot agree at all that gsf having the same drive train as rcf means it's something cool as well. they are two different class, compact luxury segment, one is mid-size. i think that part is very clear. rcf is cool i agree, but the same setup in gsf doesn't mean it's cool.

it's like saying the m4 is cool now. but stuffing that tt v6 into the m5 and i am pretty sure the whole world is going to rain hell on that car

i think lexus is very prepared to sell tiny numbers of these cars. less than 15k copies of isf over the whole generation globally, that was a huge indication. by comparison m3 sales in 2 years probably is more than that

i don't think anyone is taking credit away from lexus for making miracles. the ls400, gs400, rx300, lfa, they all made history for the company. but at the same time, that doesn't buy them any bonus points when i am strictly looking at the gsf

i am sure everyone compares things differently, and personally i agree that ES and RX are something that other luxury brands simply don't have, lexus owns the whole game. but IS and RC not in the compact luxury together with C and 3? i tend to think big part of population would disagree
Old 01-06-15, 04:11 PM
  #87  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

I guess Ill throw out there that the E550 was discontinued last year, so to be fair to the GS F, it will be faster than the E400
Old 01-06-15, 04:24 PM
  #88  
LOWFAST
Advanced
 
LOWFAST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas - DFW Area
Posts: 574
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I like it sans the wheels. We will probably pick one up used in a few years as we will need the space with our growing boys, it is already hard to fit them both in the back of the ISF. We have loved the ISF even though it is not the fastest sports sedan out there, not is it the fastest car we have ever owned. Hope the GSF price stays reasonable and there are enough sold to pick up a nice used example. I dread ever buying an M or AMG and the costs associated with maintaining it. Although I think the M6 4 door is dead sexy.
Old 01-06-15, 05:00 PM
  #89  
theory816
Lead Lap
 
theory816's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: mo
Posts: 441
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Car looks great and is everything I expected. The GS is a car aimed at guys aged 25-35 who wants luxury and now they can have a bit more power. Lexus has never really set out to beat any other cars in performance. So what you have here is perfect blend. Im going to guess this car will be priced 65-75k
Old 01-06-15, 05:24 PM
  #90  
Lexuslvr91
Lead Lap
 
Lexuslvr91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theory816
Car looks great and is everything I expected. The GS is a car aimed at guys aged 25-35 who wants luxury and now they can have a bit more power. Lexus has never really set out to beat any other cars in performance. So what you have here is perfect blend. Im going to guess this car will be priced 65-75k
Honestly in this class it isn't about having a bit more power. That's what S6s, 550i Sports, CTS V-Sports and XF Supercharges are for.

Why can't Lexus set out to beat any other cars in performance? Is this really what we expect of Lexus?

The fact that Lexus has already produced 2 F variants that competed DIRECTLY with their respected competitors leaves everyone no choice but to compare the GS-F to the same respective competitors.

IS-F...C63...RS4...M3...ATS-V
RC-F...C63...RS5...M4...ATS-V
GS-F...E63...not sold in America...M5...CTS-V

Lexus has raised our awareness of its F products that compete directly with other M, RS, V and AMG products.


Quick Reply: Lexus debuts 2016 GS F



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:37 PM.