2016 Cadillac CT6 (Page 4)
03-28-15, 09:44 AM
#46
Boardroom Thug
I've always wondered why luxury auto makers never took the MartinLogan approach, using metal grills around the cabin to electrostatically reproduce sound, instead of individual speaker cones. True, they are expensive ($79,999 a pair)? But the grills could be placed throughout the cabin providing inclusive, 360 degree sound.
http://www.martinlogan.com/neolith/index.php
http://www.martinlogan.com/neolith/index.php
When I looked at magneplanar and ML in the past, they both needed a lot of room behind them to produce the range.
03-31-15, 06:44 PM
#50
03-31-15, 09:37 PM
#52
Lexus Test Driver
Exterior styling is very weak just a longer CTS sedan really.
Not sure why the didnt use the Elmiraj styling
Also the 3700lb weight is impressive but depends if thats the base RWD car with the 4cyl engine
Not sure why the didnt use the Elmiraj styling
Also the 3700lb weight is impressive but depends if thats the base RWD car with the 4cyl engine
03-31-15, 10:16 PM
#53
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
if the pics are reasonably close to what will ship at least they get the wheel size/fitment right. 
03-31-15, 10:59 PM
#54
Lexus Test Driver
It's a pretty clean design, but too plain amongst it's stylish peers (BMW, Mercedes, Audi, Hyundai, et al). It is clear GM still does not fully have a concept of competitive business. It's high time to dump the crazy and dated, retro vertical taillights that have alienated and segregated the mark for over 15 years now. Most well-off savvy potential buyers cannot relate to it and it's time has come and gone decades ago when grandfathers, grandmothers passed away and the world moved on.
Last edited by Fizzboy7; 04-01-15 at 02:35 PM.
03-31-15, 11:42 PM
#55
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04-01-15, 04:16 AM
#58
Lexus Test Driver
Weight is impressive but can't get past a 4 and 6 cylinder model. I want effortless acceleration. I don't want to hear the engine screaming to get the car up to speed or having to rev it to 7000rpm just to get power. No thanks. I'll stick to the v8's and up for my big cars.
04-01-15, 05:37 AM
#59
Formerly Bad Co
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Weight is impressive but can't get past a 4 and 6 cylinder model. I want effortless acceleration. I don't want to hear the engine screaming to get the car up to speed or having to rev it to 7000rpm just to get power. No thanks. I'll stick to the v8's and up for my big cars.
