2016 Lexus RX revealed (pics page 35)
#244
Moderator
In the past couple of days, members of the official Lexus Advisory Council received an invitation for an online survey about future RX models. The short multiple-choice survey was focused entirely on the preference between "Design" and "3rd Row/Additional Cargo Space" on either end of a spectrum. "Design" in this context appeared to mean an RX with a somewhat sleeker (and shorter) design like a 3rd Gen RX where the sides and top angle down slightly towards the rear, vs the other choice with a longer and higher rear section containing boxier rear side windows (to likely accommodate the interior headroom needed for a 3rd row).
I know some here have said there is no 3rd row in the 4th Gen RX. It would also seem that given spy shots and suspected timing of upcoming events, the decision would have had to be made long ago one way or the other. So, perhaps this survey was really not to determine what a future RX will have, as much perhaps as to gain marketing data that substantiates the decision Lexus has already made and assists with announcement positioning statements. In any case, the timing and survey subject is interesting for all the reasons discussed here ad infinitum -- since introducing only a longer RX with a 3rd row, or having a basic design that is overly aggressive, will likely become polarizing points for potential next gen RX owners.
I know some here have said there is no 3rd row in the 4th Gen RX. It would also seem that given spy shots and suspected timing of upcoming events, the decision would have had to be made long ago one way or the other. So, perhaps this survey was really not to determine what a future RX will have, as much perhaps as to gain marketing data that substantiates the decision Lexus has already made and assists with announcement positioning statements. In any case, the timing and survey subject is interesting for all the reasons discussed here ad infinitum -- since introducing only a longer RX with a 3rd row, or having a basic design that is overly aggressive, will likely become polarizing points for potential next gen RX owners.
#245
I received the survey and thought the timing of the questions were strange. One would think Lexus has made the decisions regarding the new 4RX. Asking about the roof style and 3rd row seat preference makes you wonder if they are having second thoughts. I'm thinking the concept we'll see in April won't be the final design.
I understand the production model won't be out until late 4th Q. Does that give them time to redsign the roof line?
I understand the production model won't be out until late 4th Q. Does that give them time to redsign the roof line?
#246
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
#248
Lexus Champion
I received the survey and thought the timing of the questions were strange. One would think Lexus has made the decisions regarding the new 4RX. Asking about the roof style and 3rd row seat preference makes you wonder if they are having second thoughts. I'm thinking the concept we'll see in April won't be the final design.
I understand the production model won't be out until late 4th Q. Does that give them time to redsign the roof line?
I understand the production model won't be out until late 4th Q. Does that give them time to redsign the roof line?
If the production model is scheduled to be released for sale in the 4Q 2015, it is much too late now to be fiddling with any structural design issues, such as redesigning the roof line. The design (shape) of the final product would have been frozen quite some time ago and final prototypes, even first-run production models would have been running for months, if not a year or more by now.
#249
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
If the production model is scheduled to be released for sale in the 4Q 2015, it is much too late now to be fiddling with any structural design issues, such as redesigning the roof line. The design (shape) of the final product would have been frozen quite some time ago and final prototypes, even first-run production models would have been running for months, if not a year or more by now.
#251
If the production model is scheduled to be released for sale in the 4Q 2015, it is much too late now to be fiddling with any structural design issues, such as redesigning the roof line. The design (shape) of the final product would have been frozen quite some time ago and final prototypes, even first-run production models would have been running for months, if not a year or more by now.
Nowadays, a lower end Toyota will have a design freeze at around 24 months ahead of start of production. Lower volume models (i.e. Lexus), now require 30 months to go from a design freeze. It takes around half a year before that to make a styling decision.
The first spy shots of RX mules appeared in September 2013, but Toyota has been testing them for quite awhile behind closed doors in Japan. On the high end of Toyota products, one is looking at 36-38 months ahead of launch for a new Lexus or premium/larger Toyotas to go from design conceptualization to showroom floor. That's now parallel to German competitors, that are infamous for lengthy development programs. The next LS and LC likely have that timetable (2013 to 2016).
A decade ago, Toyota had skimmed this down to about 10.5 to 18 months on K platform and MC platform models. The new NX by itself (separate from RAV4) was a 5-year development program and final design decisions were made about 3 years ago (2012). Both that and the RX are not appendages of the RAV4/Highlander, so Lexus has moved back to 5-6 year development programs.
The new RX development program would've started around 2010, had styling proposal selection in late 2012/early 2013, and then final shape and dimensions by the summer of 2013. Full detailing might have gotten signed-off last year. An additional variant of the 4RX can go from concept proposal approval to showroom launch within an estimated 24 months. That is all dependent on if and when an additional variant was even approved internally.
Here's an example of what I mean in terms of concept approval vs final sign-off, as this is somewhat concerns my own professional work nowadays. Ensuring production feasibility of a designer's proposal for further production engineering. Much of it is digital, with the final stages being done in clay and fiberglass for sign-off.
W222 S-Class-2009 Clay Model
2009 W222 Clay Model
W222 Clay Model 2009
W222 Board Design Approval 2009
W222 Fiberglass Design Model
Here's an example from Lexus in the late 1980s, as I can't find anything on the RX.
1988 Z30 Clay Model
1989 Z30 Fiberglass Design Model
I hope this isn't too off-topic and lengthy.
#252
To correct what I said above (without editing it), the 36-38 months figure actually refers to concept selection to Job #1. It is actually an estimated total for a model like the LS nowadays, at 37.5 to 40 months (dependent on region-JDM vs US) between when the definitive designs are reached and when the first customer deliveries take place.
I found this awhile ago, as it's apparently from a Japanese magazine. Probably irrelevant now with the European spyshots.
I found this awhile ago, as it's apparently from a Japanese magazine. Probably irrelevant now with the European spyshots.
#253
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
In the past couple of days, members of the official Lexus Advisory Council received an invitation for an online survey about future RX models. The short multiple-choice survey was focused entirely on the preference between "Design" and "3rd Row/Additional Cargo Space" on either end of a spectrum. "Design" in this context appeared to mean an RX with a somewhat sleeker (and shorter) design like a 3rd Gen RX where the sides and top angle down slightly towards the rear, vs the other choice with a longer and higher rear section containing boxier rear side windows (to likely accommodate the interior headroom needed for a 3rd row).
I know some here have said there is no 3rd row in the 4th Gen RX. It would also seem that given spy shots and suspected timing of upcoming events, the decision would have had to be made long ago one way or the other. So, perhaps this survey was really not to determine what a future RX will have, as much perhaps as to gain marketing data that substantiates the decision Lexus has already made and assists with announcement positioning statements. In any case, the timing and survey subject is interesting for all the reasons discussed here ad infinitum -- since introducing only a longer RX with a 3rd row, or having a basic design that is overly aggressive, will likely become polarizing points for potential next gen RX owners.
I know some here have said there is no 3rd row in the 4th Gen RX. It would also seem that given spy shots and suspected timing of upcoming events, the decision would have had to be made long ago one way or the other. So, perhaps this survey was really not to determine what a future RX will have, as much perhaps as to gain marketing data that substantiates the decision Lexus has already made and assists with announcement positioning statements. In any case, the timing and survey subject is interesting for all the reasons discussed here ad infinitum -- since introducing only a longer RX with a 3rd row, or having a basic design that is overly aggressive, will likely become polarizing points for potential next gen RX owners.
Doesn't sound right but don't shoot me. I'm just the messenger....
Last edited by Joeb427; 03-04-15 at 05:32 AM.
#254
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#255
Lexus Test Driver
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NSW
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I ever get a new model Lexus the first thing I'd do is replace their new dorky looking mirrors with the previous classy & full colour coded ones
New shape;
Previous shape;
New shape;
Previous shape;
Last edited by yowps3; 03-04-15 at 05:36 PM.