RX - 4th Gen (2016-2022) Discussion topics related to the 2016 and up RX350 and RX450h models

2016 Lexus RX revealed (pics page 35)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-20-15, 07:00 PM
  #166  
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
MPLexus301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Friend Zone
Posts: 9,044
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The render above is interesting... some things I like, some I don't. I really hope there isn't a floating C pillar

Front will have separate LED DRLs, which that render doesn't account for.
MPLexus301 is offline  
Old 01-20-15, 08:51 PM
  #167  
RXSF
Moderator
 
RXSF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 12,044
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

For some reason, after Nissan univalent their new murano with the floating pillar, everyone thinks Lexus will do the same
RXSF is offline  
Old 01-20-15, 11:29 PM
  #168  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,836
Received 106 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MPLexus301
The render above is interesting... some things I like, some I don't. I really hope there isn't a floating C pillar

Front will have separate LED DRLs, which that render doesn't account for.
If we check very recent spy shots, no crazy c pillar...
spwolf is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 12:14 AM
  #169  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,444
Received 43 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by UZJ100GXR
New render?
Looks like NX's big brother.

I like the floating roof.

Don't like the fog light design.
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 04:09 AM
  #170  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,836
Received 106 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RXSF
For some reason, after Nissan univalent their new murano with the floating pillar, everyone thinks Lexus will do the same
well, thats because a lot of new/upcoming Toyota's and their concepts in last years had floating roof. It just doesnt seem like this car will have it based on spy shots, there is nothing like that in C pillar.
spwolf is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 04:16 AM
  #171  
rogerh00
Racer
 
rogerh00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: FL
Posts: 1,444
Received 43 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
well, thats because a lot of new/upcoming Toyota's and their concepts in last years had floating roof. It just doesnt seem like this car will have it based on spy shots, there is nothing like that in C pillar.

The only spy shots I've seen have the c pillar heavily camoed so you can't tell anything. Are there new spy shots available other than those posted in CL?
rogerh00 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 11:23 AM
  #172  
viperdoc
Pole Position
 
viperdoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: CO
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ewwwww. Don't like that rendering at all. But from the spy shots, the dimensions of the test car don't appear to be anything like that rendering (thank goodness). The rendering looks like they just took the NX and pulled the back out a couple of feet. Looks more like a station wagon, in a bad way.

The RX needs to stay its own vehicle. I hope Lexus keeps it that way. It's fine if they want to make it a smidge bigger, but I really hope that don't take the NX and just elongate it in the back just to give the option of a third row. And if a third row is an option, they desperately need a much more powerful engine in it. I also have a 2014 Acura MDX, and with the car fully loaded down with skis and luggage, and all 5 members of family in it, the MDX still pulls much better than my 3RX with only me in it. The Acura is 290hp with 267 ft-lb compared to the RX's 270 hp and 248 ft-lb...and the Acura is 400lb LIGHTER. No need to get into a horsepower war, but if Lexus wants to make the RX a true family hauler (which would be the point if a third row is an option), it needs a bigger engine
viperdoc is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 12:12 PM
  #173  
ericsan13
Racer
 
ericsan13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: WA
Posts: 1,302
Received 175 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by viperdoc
Ewwwww. Don't like that rendering at all. But from the spy shots, the dimensions of the test car don't appear to be anything like that rendering (thank goodness). The rendering looks like they just took the NX and pulled the back out a couple of feet. Looks more like a station wagon, in a bad way.

The RX needs to stay its own vehicle. I hope Lexus keeps it that way. It's fine if they want to make it a smidge bigger, but I really hope that don't take the NX and just elongate it in the back just to give the option of a third row. And if a third row is an option, they desperately need a much more powerful engine in it. I also have a 2014 Acura MDX, and with the car fully loaded down with skis and luggage, and all 5 members of family in it, the MDX still pulls much better than my 3RX with only me in it. The Acura is 290hp with 267 ft-lb compared to the RX's 270 hp and 248 ft-lb...and the Acura is 400lb LIGHTER. No need to get into a horsepower war, but if Lexus wants to make the RX a true family hauler (which would be the point if a third row is an option), it needs a bigger engine
Agree completely - nasty rendering, RX needs to stay its own vehicle.

The funny thing is that the MDX has a 3.5L engine, which is the same size as the RX, yet it produces much more power. What gives Lexus?

Edit: Weight is not too different:
2014 MDX SH-AWD w/Advance and Entertainment: 4332 lbs
2014 RX350 AWD F-Sport: 4510 lbs
178lbs difference. Similar difference across base models too: 4025 vs. 4178 lbs. This is after MDX went on a 275lb aluminum diet too.

Sources:
http://www.edmunds.com/acura/mdx/201...tyle=200476884
http://www.edmunds.com/lexus/rx-350/...tyle=200486460
http://blog.nwautos.com/2014/02/alum...ight_loss.html

Last edited by ericsan13; 01-21-15 at 12:19 PM. Reason: Weights
ericsan13 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 12:32 PM
  #174  
MPLexus301
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
MPLexus301's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Friend Zone
Posts: 9,044
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

RX needs a diet pretty badly. Didn't the 3rd gen gain something like 450lbs in weight over the 2nd generation?

I'll never forget the first time I drove 2RX and 3RX back-to-back. It was like the difference between wearing track shoes and snow shoes.
MPLexus301 is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 02:41 PM
  #175  
GSteg
Rookie
iTrader: (15)
 
GSteg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 16,017
Likes: 0
Received 78 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ericsan13
The funny thing is that the MDX has a 3.5L engine, which is the same size as the RX, yet it produces much more power. What gives Lexus?
Different generation of engines. The 3.5L engine in the MDX is 'new' for 2014. The engine in the RX350 has been there since 2008. The previous 3.7L in the MDX (same era as the RX) was mediocre. Horrible fuel economy with minimal power gains over the RX350. I expect the 2016 RX will be competitive with the current generation of mid-size crossovers.
GSteg is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 02:58 PM
  #176  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,836
Received 106 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MPLexus301
RX needs a diet pretty badly. Didn't the 3rd gen gain something like 450lbs in weight over the 2nd generation?

I'll never forget the first time I drove 2RX and 3RX back-to-back. It was like the difference between wearing track shoes and snow shoes.
i am not sure if extensive use of aluminium will actually reduce the weight compared to current RX, or just reduce overall weight of new car... New RX will be bigger and hopefully a lot more luxurious.
spwolf is offline  
Old 01-21-15, 05:57 PM
  #177  
Ice350
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Ice350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 11,349
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
I don't have the hard numbers with me (so I'll take your word on that)...but, in my area, the ES and the RX have both been extremely popular. The IS250AWD, surprisingly, also is quite popular in the D.C. area....more so than RWD models.
Definitely the RX is Lexus best selling vehicle overall.
Ice350 is offline  
Old 01-23-15, 12:37 AM
  #178  
ToT
Driver School Candidate
 
ToT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: TX
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The all new audit Q7 shed 325kg... But since the latest NX is 65kg heavier than X3, I'm not expecting much from Lexus...

Just hope what rayaans said here is true. Maybe the C pillar will be a combination of resins or new material.
ToT is offline  
Old 01-23-15, 11:58 AM
  #179  
spwolf
Lexus Champion
 
spwolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 19,836
Received 106 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ToT
The all new audit Q7 shed 325kg... But since the latest NX is 65kg heavier than X3, I'm not expecting much from Lexus...

Just hope what rayaans said here is true. Maybe the C pillar will be a combination of resins or new material.
X3 is 100lbs heavier than NX, X3 28i vs NX 2.0t AWD.
http://www.bmwusa.com/Standard/Conte...fications.aspx
http://www.lexus.com/models/NX/speci...00t-awd#engine

As to Q7, it moved from truck platform to car platform, like its buddy Tuareg... Basically as if GX or LX moved to RX platform, then thats kind of weight savings to expect.
spwolf is offline  
Old 01-23-15, 12:01 PM
  #180  
TangoRed
Lead Lap
 
TangoRed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,585
Received 24 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spwolf
As to Q7, it moved from truck platform to car platform, like its buddy Tuareg... Basically as if GX or LX moved to RX platform, then thats kind of weight savings to expect.
The Q7 and Touareg were never on a truck platform. They were always unibody SUV's...bot BOF like the LX/GX.
TangoRed is offline  


Quick Reply: 2016 Lexus RX revealed (pics page 35)



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:24 AM.