Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Worst cars of 2014 in Consumer Reports' tests

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-20-14, 01:50 PM
  #1  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default Worst cars of 2014 in Consumer Reports' tests

The Consumer Reports car-testing team gets to drive some wonderful cars every year. But along with all the noteworthy vehicles we drive come some memorable stinkers.

What makes a car bad? An insufferable, noisy cabin. A rock-hard ride. Miserable fuel economy. Wobbly tricycle-grade handling. Some cars even manage to have all of those downsides. Cars that are clearly deficient in multiple areas earn scores well below the norm for their class.

As you peruse the list of the seven lowest-scoring new cars in our rankings, it might seem as if we’re picking on small cars. We aren’t. In fact, a few small cars do well in our tests and are recommended, including the Kia Rio and Nissan Versa Note. But, inherently, small-budget models struggle to excel in our tests, due to typical packaging, noise, and performance shortcomings.

Several low-scoring models here are from Japanese manufacturers. Just because a car comes from a company with a reputation for performance or reliability doesn’t mean it automatically gets high scores in our evaluations. Even respected brands can have underachievers in the product line.

The cars listed here are true stinkers and have the lowest ratings in our tests. Regardless of reliability or owner satisfaction, none scored high enough to earn our recommendation. (Scores are on a scale of 1 to 100.)

To avoid these and other subpar cars, check all of our tested models.

—Mike Quincy

Scion tC

Base MSRP price range: $19,210-$20,360

Score: 44


Question: When is a sporty car not sporty at all? Answer: When it’s the Scion tC. It certainly looks inviting, and the Scion tC comes with lots of standard equipment, including a touch-screen audio system and a large sunroof. But that’s where the good news ends. The Scion tC’s stiff suspension and heavy steering shouldn’t fool you into thinking this is a performance machine. Handling is entirely humdrum, and even smooth roads produce a jarring ride. Granted, we don’t expect a car like the tC to be quiet, but the cabin produces a din of unpleasant engine drone and a tiresome exhaust howl. So it is neither a sport coupe that’s exciting to drive nor a stylish coupe for those just wanting to look good. Need more convincing that the tC belongs in the bottom rung of our tests? None of our drivers thought the Scion tC fit them well; sitting behind the wheel feels like you've descended into a cave. If you want something with a Toyota/Scion pedigree that’s truly fun to drive, check out the Scion FR-S. Its reliability may be in question, but its sports credentials sure aren’t.


Chevrolet Spark

Base MSRP price range: $12,270-$27,210

Score: 42


You think that a car as small as the Chevrolet Spark would deliver stellar fuel economy, right? Spoiler alert: The Spark, with its dinky 84-hp, 1.2-liter four-cylinder engine, only returned 31 mpg overall in our tests—that’s even less than the midsized Mazda6. And to get that lackluster economy, you still have to put up with a ride that shakes your kidneys, a cabin noisier than a Metallica concert, and front seats so narrow and firm that it almost (we said almost) makes coach-class airline seats seem plush. Finally, the nail in the Chevrolet Spark’s coffin has to be the over-complicated MyLink Touch radio on higher trim levels: It has no ***** or traditional buttons…not even a volume ****. (LS models have a simple, mostly-well-designed radio.) And don’t let the low price “spark” your interest in buying one: The Chevrolet Spark is no winner in our owner satisfaction survey, either.


Scion iQ

Base MSRP price: $15,665

Score: 36


Despite a too-clever name, the puny Scion iQ isn’t the class valedictorian. Its 34 mpg overall fuel economy is decent, and it’s small enough to practically park in a shoe box. But these attributes are far outweighed by the iQ’s agonizingly brittle ride and handling that feels as darty as a hockey puck. Road, wind, and engine noise absolutely roar on the highway. And the two-person rear seat is among the biggest jokes in the automotive kingdom; it’s so small you have to step outside to change your mind. How’s the Scion iQ selling for Toyota? Not well. Industry reports show that just 1,935 units were sold during the first 11 months in 2014. Rumors say that it has one foot out the door of the U.S. market.


Mitsubishi i-MiEV

Base MSRP price: $22,995

Score: 35


Some electric cars have impressed us (Tesla Model S, Ford Focus Electric, Nissan Leaf), but Mitsubishi’s lackluster effort somehow feels short circuited in contrast. It’s not even because its meager 59-mile range and a six-hour recharge time (we averaged about 75 miles for a six-hour charge with the Nissan Leaf). It's that the ride is horrendous, acceleration is painfully slow, and the i-MiEV comes with an antiquated interior with fit and finish that feels decidedly third-world cheap. True, zero tailpipe emissions and low operating costs are pluses. But we’ve driven better golf carts than the Mitsubishi i-MiEV.


Mitsubishi Mirage

Base MSRP price range: $12,995-$15,395

Score: 29


The Mitsubishi Mirage lives up to its name. While its low $16,000 sticker price and good fuel economy of 37 mpg overall may conjure up an inviting image of a good, economical runabout, that illusion quickly dissipates into the haze when you drive this tiny, regrettable car. The Mirage is a little hatchback that's built in Thailand and powered by a small three-cylinder engine. To make it saleable, Mitsubishi primed the pump with a rather impressive list of standard features. But the car is way too slow and noisy, even for a cheap subcompact, to effectively compete in this competitive class. Tempted by the low price? Buy a good used car instead.


Smart ForTwo

Base MSRP price range: $13,270 - $17,930

Score: 25


There are few cars as tiny as the two-seater Smart ForTwo. Hence, its light weight and minimal footprint make it a snap to park and thrifty with fuel; we measured 39 mpg overall (on premium). Other than those seemingly admirable traits, the Smart ForTwo is a pretty dumb choice. It has among the worst transmissions we’ve ever tested, with frequent shifts that are slow and jerky enough to send the car and its occupants lurching back and forth. It’s also slow as a DMV license-renewal line: Reaching 60 mph takes an interminable 14.6 seconds. You also have to deal with a harsh and choppy ride that simply crashes over bumps. The Smart ForTwo is not a smart choice.


Jeep Wrangler Unlimited

Base MSRP price range: $22,695-$35,395

Score: 20


Meet the lowest-ranked vehicle in our tests, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited. The Wrangler is one of those rare vehicles that basically bombs in our tests, but our subscribers still really like it. In fact, 74 percent of the owners in our most recent satisfaction survey said they’d buy one again. So what’s the problem? Driven daily on “normal” roads, the ride is punishing, handling is clumsy, and it drinks fuel like kids devour juice pouches (17 mpg overall). But there are few vehicles that have a “cool” factor as high as a Wrangler. We get that. We also get that it’s impressive off-road. But to use this as an everyday car? Literally, every other vehicle on the market is judged to be better.

https://autos.yahoo.com/news/worst-c...143000369.html
bagwell is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 01:55 PM
  #2  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I agree with all except the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited; its a purpose built vehicle.
bagwell is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 02:18 PM
  #3  
Joeb427
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joeb427's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 11,670
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell



Smart ForTwo

Base MSRP price range: $13,270 - $17,930

Score: 25


There are few cars as tiny as the two-seater Smart ForTwo. Hence, its light weight and minimal footprint make it a snap to park and thrifty with fuel; we measured 39 mpg overall (on premium). Other than those seemingly admirable traits, the Smart ForTwo is a pretty dumb choice. It has among the worst transmissions we’ve ever tested, with frequent shifts that are slow and jerky enough to send the car and its occupants lurching back and forth. It’s also slow as a DMV license-renewal line: Reaching 60 mph takes an interminable 14.6 seconds. You also have to deal with a harsh and choppy ride that simply crashes over bumps. The Smart ForTwo is not a smart choice.


[
]

I agree!
Joeb427 is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 03:19 PM
  #4  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bagwell
Jeep Wrangler Unlimited

Base MSRP price range: $22,695-$35,395

Score: 20


Meet the lowest-ranked vehicle in our tests, the Jeep Wrangler Unlimited. The Wrangler is one of those rare vehicles that basically bombs in our tests, but our subscribers still really like it. In fact, 74 percent of the owners in our most recent satisfaction survey said they’d buy one again. So what’s the problem? Driven daily on “normal” roads, the ride is punishing, handling is clumsy, and it drinks fuel like kids devour juice pouches (17 mpg overall). But there are few vehicles that have a “cool” factor as high as a Wrangler. We get that. We also get that it’s impressive off-road. But to use this as an everyday car? Literally, every other vehicle on the market is judged to be better.

https://autos.yahoo.com/news/worst-c...143000369.html

They need to put down their crack pipe at consumer reports. Like somebody else said, its a purpose built vehicle that is just a ton of fun in the right conditions. The thing I like about it is you can take the doors and top off it, its an amazing convertible. Plus Chrysler did a really nice job on the mid-cycle refresh when they put the 3.6 pentastar V6 under the hood. Now you have enough horsepower to run a low 15 second quarter mile, which for a Jeep is straight flying.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 04:02 PM
  #5  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
They need to put down their crack pipe at consumer reports. Like somebody else said, its a purpose built vehicle that is just a ton of fun in the right conditions.

There's no crack pipe at CR. They give the Wrangler credit for its good off-road capability. But most driving is not done that way.

Last edited by mmarshall; 12-20-14 at 06:44 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 04:03 PM
  #6  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

An excellent list. I agree with every one of them.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 06:00 PM
  #7  
LazarusLng
Pole Position
 
LazarusLng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: MI
Posts: 257
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thats pretty funny that the Jeep Wrangler is at the bottom of the list. I have owned three Jeep vehicles. Two Grand Cherokees, and one Cherokee. Still have one of them, 2002 Grand Cherokee. All three were good vehicles. A buddy of mine has an 08 Wrangler. Low miles, and tons of problems. I know that he runs his harder than most. but it certainly hasn't held up as an off road vehicle. If you're going to own a Jeep, you better like to wield a wrench.
LazarusLng is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 06:25 PM
  #8  
toy4two
Lexus Champion
 
toy4two's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ca
Posts: 1,979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my friend bought his wife a Wrangler, he said it was the biggest mistake of their lives, it was an awful car for her to live with as a daily driver, they wound up selling it for a big loss less than a year later
toy4two is offline  
Old 12-20-14, 06:50 PM
  #9  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lazarus
A buddy of mine has an 08 Wrangler. Low miles, and tons of problems. I know that he runs his harder than most. but it certainly hasn't held up as an off road vehicle. If you're going to own a Jeep, you better like to wield a wrench.

With the Wrangler, though, one must differentiate between mechanical reliability and off-road capability. Everyone knows that a Wrangler is a classic Mountain Goat...that's no secret. Off-road, with its extremely high approach/breakover/departure angles, it can cope with just about anything from creek beds to rock-scrambling to ledges to mud, snow, water....you name it. Get the ultra-hard-core Rubicon version, with underpinnings like a rock, and it's even more of a goat. But, unfortunately, that off-road prowess doesn't always translate into mechanical or drivetrain reliability.

Last edited by mmarshall; 12-20-14 at 06:58 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-21-14, 12:46 AM
  #10  
Fizzboy7
Lexus Test Driver
 
Fizzboy7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California
Posts: 9,679
Received 156 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

I've never driven the current tC, but it sells quite well here in L.A. High school and college kids love it. It's good for them because it's affordbale and appears sporty. That image is all that really matters. It doesn't perform thankfully, which keeps them away from trouble. Give them a noisy Mustang or Camaro and they'll infuse it into guardrails.
Fizzboy7 is online now  
Old 12-21-14, 12:57 AM
  #11  
nipponbird
Lead Lap
 
nipponbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Rep of South Africa
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
With the Wrangler, though, one must differentiate between mechanical reliability and off-road capability. Everyone knows that a Wrangler is a classic Mountain Goat...that's no secret. Off-road, with its extremely high approach/breakover/departure angles, it can cope with just about anything from creek beds to rock-scrambling to ledges to mud, snow, water....you name it. Get the ultra-hard-core Rubicon version, with underpinnings like a rock, and it's even more of a goat. But, unfortunately, that off-road prowess doesn't always translate into mechanical or drivetrain reliability.
And to think the Wrangler is a descendant of the WWii Jeep. Chrysler would do better if they just bring out that old Jeep and bin the Wrangler.
nipponbird is offline  
Old 12-21-14, 09:07 AM
  #12  
bitkahuna
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
bitkahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Present
Posts: 73,770
Received 2,127 Likes on 1,379 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
An excellent list. I agree with every one of them.
really? they're all dirt cheap cars for one thing, but of course CR paints everything with the same brush. the cheap cars don't measure up with the smoothest rides or best of anything - hardly shocking.

it's one more easy press-generating worthless article from CR

the scioniq and smartfortwo ARE terrible though because they're useless and awful unless parking in very tight spaces in a city is one's highest priority.
bitkahuna is offline  
Old 12-21-14, 09:14 AM
  #13  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
really? they're all dirt cheap cars for one thing, but of course CR paints everything with the same brush. the cheap cars don't measure up with the smoothest rides or best of anything - hardly shocking.
Of course, to an extent, at least, you get what you pay for. One does not expect a 15K econobox to drive like an LS460. CR never said otherwise. They are only listing what their own auto tests have determined (as they also list their best-performing products)....I see nothing wrong with that.

it's one more easy press-generating worthless article from CR
My experience, over the years, has been that what they say, both in auto-testing and reliability stats, is usually pretty accurate. Have there been a few mistakes here and there? Yes.....no organization is perfect.

the scioniq and smartfortwo ARE terrible though because they're useless and awful unless parking in very tight spaces in a city is one's highest priority.
I found the iQ slightly better car than the Smart overall (which is awful), but IMO neither of them should have been introduced to the American market. The Smart is probably unfit for more than 99% of typical American driving conditions, and the iQ is close to that. Their only really saving grace is, as you note, easy urban parking, and, with the Smart, easy changing of the clip-on plastic body panels.

Last edited by mmarshall; 12-21-14 at 09:21 AM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-21-14, 09:16 AM
  #14  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bitkahuna
really? they're all dirt cheap cars for one thing, but of course CR paints everything with the same brush. the cheap cars don't measure up with the smoothest rides or best of anything - hardly shocking.

it's one more easy press-generating worthless article from CR

the scioniq and smartfortwo ARE terrible though because they're useless and awful unless parking in very tight spaces in a city is one's highest priority.
So you DO agree with CR then?

I believe they also list their highest rated cars too.
LexBob2 is offline  
Old 12-23-14, 07:58 AM
  #15  
bagwell
Lexus Champion
Thread Starter
 
bagwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 11,205
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
I believe they also list their highest rated cars too.
yep... https://autos.yahoo.com/news/best-ca...140000592.html

10. Infiniti Q70

Base MSRP price range: $49,850 - $67,050

The Q70 is the lone Japanese car to make our top 10. It earns its spot through a combination of agile handling, firm-yet-compliant ride, and strong powertrain. Our tested Q70 was very quick, with its 330-hp, 3.7-liter V6 and smooth seven-speed automatic dashing off 0-60 mph sprints in 5.8 seconds and returning a decent 21 mpg overall. We also tested the hybrid version, which was slightly quicker and delivered 25 mpg overall, but its transition between electric and gas mode was too abrupt and discredited some of the car’s overall refinement. Interior quality is top-notch, and the rear seat is roomy. You can even get an extended-length L version should you want to stretch your legs further.


9. Audi A6/A7

Base MSRP price range: $44,800 - $75,500 / $65,900 - $106,500

The A6 and A7 share the same platform—and get the same score—hence sharing a spot on this top 10 list. Both are outstanding vehicles, giving shoppers a tempting choice between sedan (A6) and hatchback body styles (A7), as well as a variety of four-cylinder, V6, V8, and turbodiesel powertrains. We tested both a V6-powered A6 and a turbodiesel A7; both provided smooth and acceleration. As you’d expect, the A7 won the fuel economy contest with 28 mpg overall. (The A6 got 22.) Both also supply a hushed, nicely finished cabin with all-day-comfort seats. The A6 is engaging to drive with nimble handling and quick, communicative steering. The A7 has hatchback versatility and sleeker styling. Another feather in both of their caps: They tied in our owner satisfaction survey, with 84 percent of our A6/A7 drivers saying they’d buy it again.


8. Chevrolet Impala

Base MSRP price range: $27,060 - $40,660

The Impala has the distinction of being the least expensive car on our list. Base price is just around $27,000, and, with a bunch of options, the car tops out near $40,000. The interior is roomy, comfortable, and quiet. The most surprising thing about the Impala is how enjoyable it is to drive. The available 3.6-liter V6 is punchy. Handling is very responsive, and the steering feel is more like a German car than an old-school Detroit cruiser. It even rides like a luxury sedan, feeling cushy yet controlled. The full-featured cabin stays very quiet, with a sumptuous backseat and a huge trunk. First-year reliability for the redesigned Impala has been average for the V6 (not so much for the four-cylinder model). The V6 is the one we like most, anyway. And we really like this car.


7. Audi A8

Base MSRP price range: $77,400 - $137,900

Expensive and exclusive, the A8 is Audi’s flagship sedan. It’s also one of the sportiest luxury sedans we've tested. The A8 carries a price premium (our tested model rang up at more than $91,000), but it provides smooth and effortless acceleration, with commendable 21 mpg overall—even with all-wheel drive. The big car holds the road tenaciously, with crisp handling. Inside you’ll find a wonderful interior ambience made of high-quality materials and fine craftsmanship. The exceptionally comfortable and supportive front seats have a variety of massage settings. All-in-all, we’d love this car on a cross-country road trip. Or really any excuse to get behind the wheel.


6. Chevrolet Corvette Stingray

Base MSRP price range: $54,000 - $64,000

This is the seventh generation of the fantastic plastic all-American sports car, and it’s safe to say that the Corvette keeps getting better. The styling is head-turning sharp and GM finally upgraded the interior. The heart of this beast, of course, is the magnificent 6.2-liter V8 producing 455 hp. Acceleration is blistering: 0-60-mph in just 4.3 seconds, with a throaty exhaust soundtrack. Handling is pinpoint, making this the most agile Corvette we’ve ever tested. With the adjustable driving modes, the car can be a civilized cruiser or track-ready race car. We’re not sure anyone needs even more power, but a 650-hp Z06 version is also available. Keeping traditions alive, you can choose from coupe or convertible body styles, and automatic and manual transmissions.


5. Mercedes-Benz E250 diesel

Base MSRP price range: $51,800 - $103,200

Looking for a luxury car that's super comfortable and cruises the highway for more than 800 miles without a fuel stop? What if it were the highest-rated luxury car in Consumer Reports’ owner satisfaction survey and aced just about all of our tests? That car is the outstanding E-Class diesel. The well-finished interior is plush and feels substantial. Handling is secure and agile. Noise levels are at a bare minimum. Seat comfort and driver visibility are among the best. Is there anything this car can’t do? Yeah, stay still. Judging by the number of miles our staff put on this car, it's an undeniable favorite.


4. Porsche 911

Base MSRP price range: $84,300 - $194,600

Like the Corvette, the 911 just keeps getting better. While the look hasn’t drastically changed over the years, the current model still hides a thoroughly modern sports car, promising stunning performance and unexpected civility. The Carrera S version that we tested had a 400-hp, 3.8-liter six-cylinder engine which sang a glorious song as we ran it through the gears. Yes, it’s mighty quick: 0-60 mph takes just a brisk and grin-inducing 4.1 seconds. The 911 also corners enthusiastically; it’s uncanny how the car dives into corners, with super-quick turn-in response and not a trace of dartiness. You might not think the 911 would be much of a road-tripper, but it isn't particularly taxing on long trips, thanks to its relatively supple ride and decent sound deadening. This 911 truly lives up to all of its highly praised status.


3. Mercedes-Benz S550

Base MSRP price range: $94,400 - $230,900

Judging by the posh and commodious rear seat, we’ll bet that many S-Class owners aren’t always driving the car. But we’d argue that there’s more satisfaction from behind the wheel than sitting in back scrolling through the Wall Street Journal. The powerful 4.7-liter turbo V8 provides effortless acceleration and managed 18 mpg overall in our tests. The ride is arguably the best in the land, and the cabin is very hushed. Even though it's large and posh, handling agility is commendable. Say you’d like a more green-friendly luxury car? A plug-in hybrid arrives in Spring 2015. This top-shelf Benz lives up to its billing as one of the finest sedans on the planet.


2. BMW M235i

Base MSRP price range: $32,100 - $44,900

For all the doubters out there that thought BMW had lost its way, you must drive the M235i. The small coupe has razor-sharp handling and a sense of immediacy that is unlike other recent BMWs. The car responds to steering inputs with instant turn-in response and barely any body lean. The M235i that we tested has a terrific 320-hp, 3.0-liter turbo six-cylinder engine—simply a gem of a power plant. Accompanied by a satisfyingly sonorous exhaust, the M235i responds instantly to every prod to the throttle, with smooth, abundant torque and a high-end punch. The manual shifter is also a delight to use. And the car's 25 mpg overall is commendable. The beautifully finished cabin is tastefully accented by "M" badges here and there, and the sculpted seats provide comfortable support. Simply put, the M235i is a joy to drive and a clear indication that BMW still knows how to engineer fun.


1. Tesla Model S

Base MSRP price range: $69,900 - $104,500

Look past its slick styling, futuristic controls, rapid-fire acceleration, and superb handling, and you’ve still got a car that gets the equivalent of 84 mpg. With its optional 85-kWh battery, the largest available, it can travel between 180 and 225 miles per charge and can fully charge in as little as five hours on a dedicated Tesla connector. How fast is fast? Our 362-hp Model S shot from 0-60 mph in 5.6 seconds. That's very quick and on par with a V8-powered Porsche Panamera S, Jaguar XJ, or a BMW 7 Series. The Tesla isn’t cheap—starting at around $70,000—but few cars have dazzled more.
bagwell is offline  


Quick Reply: Worst cars of 2014 in Consumer Reports' tests



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:24 PM.