Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

Couple close to death after night in car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-14, 12:52 PM
  #61  
J.P.
Boardroom Thug

 
J.P.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Treasury
Posts: 8,764
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

If they can do snakes on a plane, they can make a movie out of this
J.P. is offline  
Old 12-26-14, 01:00 PM
  #62  
tex2670
Lexus Test Driver
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 9,958
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
If they can do snakes on a plane, they can make a movie out of this
I would watch that...
tex2670 is online now  
Old 12-27-14, 01:55 AM
  #63  
FrankReynoldsCPA
Lexus Test Driver
 
FrankReynoldsCPA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6,477
Received 62 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

As long as it has Sam Jackson, I'm in.

The more I reread this article looking for some reason to cut these folks slack, the more I become convinced that they are not fit to be operating machinery.
FrankReynoldsCPA is online now  
Old 12-27-14, 08:52 AM
  #64  
chikoo
Lexus Champion
 
chikoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: TX
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J.P.
If they can do snakes on a plane, they can make a movie out of this
title call:

1. Octos in a car
2.
3.
chikoo is offline  
Old 12-29-14, 06:07 PM
  #65  
Nextourer
Lexus Champion
 
Nextourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: none
Posts: 4,192
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Totally agree. But it's a good likelihood that all within the same make do. Plus, again, no one has explained how they locked themselves into the car in the first place, since they didn't have the fob. Which leads me to think the story's fake.
Hmm, the Yaris and Corolla/Matrix don't have auto-unlock front door handles but the Prius, Camry, Avalon do. (As do all the SUVs and Sienna last time I checked). I've found Toyota tends to be more detailed-oriented and offer small features that don't appear in competitors' cars (like retained accessory power or a rear sunshade in the Gen 5 Camry or illuminated ignition keyhole & retractable overhead assist grips in the Gen 8 Corolla)
Nextourer is offline  
Old 12-29-14, 06:27 PM
  #66  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nextourer
Hmm, the Yaris and Corolla/Matrix don't have auto-unlock front door handles but the Prius, Camry, Avalon do.
Decades ago, back in the early 1960s, many cars had a system where even if the door-lock buttons were pushed down all the way, it ONLY locked the doors so that one could not open them from the outside. If you pulled on the inside door latch while sitting down inside, even with the lock-button down, that would override the lock-latch and open the door. The 1963 Plymouth, for one, that I first learned to drive on was like that. Obviously, that was not good for kids, who tend to play around with things while the car was moving. If not belted in (and many cars back then didn't even have lap-belts), kids or absent-minded adults could accidentally open the doors and possibly fall out.

That changed with the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, which contained a number of safety-requirements that Ralph Nader had advocated in his famous book "Unsafe at any Speed." Among other features, all cars, after that, had to have non-overriding latches that would not open from the inside even if the lock-button was down. A couple of decades later, this was extended to include the "Kiddie-Proof" locks where a secret lever, hidden in the door-jamb, deactivated the inside button, period....so that kids in back could not unlock the inside rear doors at all, even if the button was pulled up.

Last edited by mmarshall; 12-29-14 at 06:44 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-29-14, 06:41 PM
  #67  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Decades ago, back in the 1960s, many cars had a system where even if the door-lock buttons were pushed down all the way, it ONLY locked the doors so that one could not open them from the outside. If you pulled on the inside door latch while sitting down inside, even with the lock-button down, that would override the lock-latch and open the door. The 1963 Plymouth, for one, that I first learned to drive on was like that. Obviously, that was not good for kids, who tend to play around with things while the car was moving.....if not belted in (and many cars back then didn't even have lap-belts), kids could accidentally open the doors and possibly fall out.

That changed with the Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966, which contained a number of safety-requirements that Ralph Nader had advocated in his famous book "Unsafe at any Speed." Among other features, all cars, after that, had to have non-overriding latches that would not open from the inside even if the lock-button was down. A couple of decades later, this was extended to include the "Kiddie-Proof" locks where a secret lever, hidden in the door-jamb, deactivated the inside button, period....so that kids in back could not unlock the inside rear doors at all, even if the button was pulled up.

The doors in certain 80's-00's Fords are like that in the front. Stupid design because it makes the car very easy to break into with a metal rod. Especially on cars like the Mustang that had frameless door glass. Pull the window back a little, insert rod, pull door handle, you are in within 10 seconds.
Aron9000 is offline  
Old 12-29-14, 06:49 PM
  #68  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
The doors in certain 80's-00's Fords are like that in the front. Stupid design because it makes the car very easy to break into with a metal rod. Especially on cars like the Mustang that had frameless door glass. Pull the window back a little, insert rod, pull door handle, you are in within 10 seconds.

Well, since you yourself saw it, I'll take your word for it, but I don't know how Ford, at that time, managed to get a design like that certified for sale in the U.S. market (unless it was for a non-U.S.version). Overriding inside latches were banned for U.S.-spec cars after the late 1960s.

Last edited by mmarshall; 12-29-14 at 06:56 PM.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-29-14, 07:41 PM
  #69  
Sulu
Lexus Champion
 
Sulu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,309
Likes: 0
Received 30 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aron9000
The doors in certain 80's-00's Fords are like that in the front. Stupid design because it makes the car very easy to break into with a metal rod. Especially on cars like the Mustang that had frameless door glass. Pull the window back a little, insert rod, pull door handle, you are in within 10 seconds.

I don't suppose you are talking about those mushroom-shaped door lock buttons from the 1970s and early 1980s? If you locked your keys in the car, all you had to do was straigten out a coat hanger (take it from the coat hanger that replaced the broken whip antenna), twirl a loop in one end, jimmy it in to the car between the glass and door frame, work the loop around the mushroom cap and pull to unlock the car.

Then the automakers went to those door lock buttons without a cap and eventually to the swivelling lock button that is part of the inside door handle.
Sulu is offline  
Old 12-29-14, 07:51 PM
  #70  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Sulu
I don't suppose you are talking about those mushroom-shaped door lock buttons from the 1970s and early 1980s? If you locked your keys in the car, all you had to do was straigten out a coat hanger (take it from the coat hanger that replaced the broken whip antenna), twirl a loop in one end, jimmy it in to the car between the glass and door frame, work the loop around the mushroom cap and pull to unlock the car.
Good point, Sulu....I think you're correct that that's what Aron 9000 meant. The 1966 ban on overriding inside latches I described earlier did not specify how the button had to be shaped. And, yes, a button with a flared-top on it was a lot easier to jimmy with a coat-hanger loop than a smooth one.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-30-14, 11:53 AM
  #71  
1KhpWrx
Lead Lap
iTrader: (7)
 
1KhpWrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 690
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is why old people need to stick to using the senior citizen shuttles and staying near leisure world.
1KhpWrx is offline  
Old 12-30-14, 12:15 PM
  #72  
sick21
Lexus Test Driver
 
sick21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NM
Posts: 1,081
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1KhpWrx
This is why old people need to stick to using the senior citizen shuttles and staying near leisure world.
I wouldn't really say they were senior citizens. Older, but not elderly.

Last edited by sick21; 12-30-14 at 12:19 PM.
sick21 is offline  
Old 12-30-14, 02:14 PM
  #73  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 1KhpWrx
This is why old people need to stick to using the senior citizen shuttles and staying near leisure world.
Only a guess, but when you hit 65-68 your outlook will probably change. You might even stll be driving to and from work.
LexBob2 is online now  
Old 12-30-14, 02:22 PM
  #74  
mmarshall
Lexus Fanatic
 
mmarshall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia/D.C. suburbs
Posts: 90,577
Received 83 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
Only a guess, but when you hit 65-68 your outlook will probably change. You might even stll be driving to and from work.
Not with the self-driving cars on the horizon.
mmarshall is offline  
Old 12-31-14, 04:41 PM
  #75  
Aron9000
Lexus Champion
 
Aron9000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 4,592
Received 28 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mmarshall
Good point, Sulu....I think you're correct that that's what Aron 9000 meant. The 1966 ban on overriding inside latches I described earlier did not specify how the button had to be shaped. And, yes, a button with a flared-top on it was a lot easier to jimmy with a coat-hanger loop than a smooth one.
No, I'm talking about that lovely ford design on the front doors, you push the little lock lever down flush with the top of the door trim. If you want to unlock the door you couldn't pull the lever up because it goes inside the door. To unlock it you pulled the door handle to open the door, maybe you had to pull the handle twice. I know Ford Rangers were like this, friend had a 90's model and his little bratty kid once just grabbed the door handle with it locked and the door flies open.

Newer Audis and VW's are like this, the locks are electric, only a little red dot at the top of the door to tell if its locked. You use the power lock button to lock/unlock the door, or just pull the inside door handle once or twice and it'll open. I don't know what happens if the electronics in the door short out or the battery goes dead, I assume there is still a mechanical linkage with the inside door handle to unlock it. But it wouldn't surprise me if the Germans found a way to redesign the door lock to make it completely electronic, they like to redesign stupid simple things that worked fine before to make them more complicated.
Aron9000 is offline  


Quick Reply: Couple close to death after night in car



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:56 AM.