Car Chat General discussion about Lexus, other auto manufacturers and automotive news.

First Drive / Quick Spin: 2015 Chevrolet Colorado / 2015 GMC Canyon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-15, 11:14 AM
  #46  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,479
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
The whole Japan point, rather obviously, was that the Toyota sales guy was stating that the Tundra was better than domestics as it was made in Japan.....

And no, I don't buy the superior engineering on the trucks. The Tundra is dated and well behind the curve. It is down on power, suffers from poor fuel economy and has very dated technology.
I don't find the electric steering or V6 Turbo (when it should of been a V8) superior. I call that fluff. The real world MPG of the F150 are not better than the Tundra, they are all around 15mpg combined.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 11:17 AM
  #47  
swajames
Pole Position
 
swajames's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,192
Received 476 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I don't find the electric steering or V6 Turbo (when it should of been a V8) superior. I call that fluff. The real world MPG of the F150 are not better than the Tundra, they are all around 15mpg combined.
The C&D test I posted supports all the points I made and all the observations I made.
swajames is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 12:24 PM
  #48  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,479
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
The C&D test I posted supports all the points I made and all the observations I made.
Don't fall for the C and D stuff or the marketing propaganda. Any of the trucks can do what needs to be done. But its a fact that the Toyota will last longer and be more dependable. And let's not forget that the Toyota is the only truck maker that is SAE certified for towing.

The best summary of the new F150 was Motor Trend which said "An incredibly capable and well thought out truck, but fails to deliver on the hype".

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 02-21-15 at 12:29 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 12:48 PM
  #49  
tex2670
Lexus Test Driver
 
tex2670's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 9,958
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Don't fall for the C and D stuff or the marketing propaganda. Any of the trucks can do what needs to be done. But its a fact that the Toyota will last longer and be more dependable. And let's not forget that the Toyota is the only truck maker that is SAE certified for towing.

The best summary of the new F150 was Motor Trend which said "An incredibly capable and well thought out truck, but fails to deliver on the hype".
Considering that the "hype" is weigh savings and better fuel economy, I'm not sure how much I'd read into that statement. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck. I don't recall ever seeing a published truck comparison where any Japanese make came out on top.
tex2670 is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 12:51 PM
  #50  
LexBob2
Lexus Champion
 
LexBob2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 10,987
Received 137 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
Don't fall for the C and D stuff or the marketing propaganda. Any of the trucks can do what needs to be done. But its a fact that the Toyota will last longer and be more dependable. And let's not forget that the Toyota is the only truck maker that is SAE certified for towing.

The best summary of the new F150 was Motor Trend which said "An incredibly capable and well thought out truck, but fails to deliver on the hype".
So, don't fall for the C&D stuff, but accept the MT stuff?
LexBob2 is online now  
Old 02-21-15, 12:57 PM
  #51  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,479
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tex2670
Considering that the "hype" is weigh savings and better fuel economy, I'm not sure how much I'd read into that statement. That doesn't mean it's a bad truck. I don't recall ever seeing a published truck comparison where any Japanese make came out on top.
I didn't say it was a bad truck, none of the trucks are bad. There is nothing you can't do it a F150 that you can do in a Toyota and vice versa.

The engineering when in comes to durability, dependability and the time tested Toyota reliability will favour the Toyota. Its always been like that.

Last edited by Toys4RJill; 02-21-15 at 01:04 PM.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 01:01 PM
  #52  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,479
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexBob2
So, don't fall for the C&D stuff, but accept the MT stuff?
It just goes to show you how these magazines mean nothing. You have to hear it from real owners. That is one of the reasons why I said the real world MPG of the Ford is on par with the rest of the segment. The turbo V6 of the Ford is nothing special when it comes to MPG.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-21-15, 01:13 PM
  #53  
Toys4RJill
Lexus Fanatic
 
Toys4RJill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: ON/NY
Posts: 30,479
Received 62 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by swajames
The C&D test I posted supports all the points I made and all the observations I made.
I just looked at that article you posted. Its nothing special when examining the specs. All came within 14-16 MPG combined and the Toy is the only one with a 4.30 rear. To real truck buyer, the 4.30 is what you want, not a 3.23 of 3.55.

The F150 real world MPG was far outside the EPA ratings which indicates that Ford might be pulling a scam.

And the domestics tow ratings are artificial, only the Toy is SAE approved.
Toys4RJill is offline  
Old 02-22-15, 10:14 PM
  #54  
pbm317
Lead Lap
 
pbm317's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,889
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by LexsCTJill
I just looked at that article you posted. Its nothing special when examining the specs. All came within 14-16 MPG combined and the Toy is the only one with a 4.30 rear. To real truck buyer, the 4.30 is what you want, not a 3.23 of 3.55.

The F150 real world MPG was far outside the EPA ratings which indicates that Ford might be pulling a scam.

And the domestics tow ratings are artificial, only the Toy is SAE approved.
2015 Ford F150 ratings are now SAE compliant. Not all "real truck buyers" want a 4.30 rear end, most truck buyers want options so that their truck is suited to their needs. This is one area that Toyota doesn't deliver with the Tundra. Minimizing build options, as is commonly Toyota's way, limits the variations, which truck buyers generally like to have very specific options.
pbm317 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hoovey689
Car Chat
38
11-13-14 08:01 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
37
01-30-14 11:13 AM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
5
04-01-13 05:40 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
1
11-07-12 12:05 PM
Hoovey689
Car Chat
2
10-10-12 10:53 PM



Quick Reply: First Drive / Quick Spin: 2015 Chevrolet Colorado / 2015 GMC Canyon



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:07 PM.