Infiniti Q60 News
#91
Well, it has to be remembered that automotive "reliability" is measured in today's terms, where, by the standards of several decades ago, almost all vehicles today could be considered reliable. I clearly remember (and unfortunately, owned) some vehicles from the late 70s and 80s that, compared to even today's "unreliable" cars such as the Nissans we are talking about, couldn't hold a candle to them. It makes you wonder how those cars back then ever got off the assembly lines.
#92
Lexus Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
many / most change because they want a change and get bored, rather than the cars becoming unreliable. and cars get old faster now because automotive technology (not just gadgets but build techniques, fuel economy, safety, etc.) is advancing faster and faster.
#93
I'd much rather change my car because I want something newer or more features as oppose to it being too unreliable. This is why I'm sticking with Toyota/Lexus from now on. Reliability is a PRIORITY with them.
#94
I sat in one at the dealer, for a 50k + car the interior build quality and material are terrible. Went to the Lexus show room after and a fully optioned out IS250AWD at 47k was many times better. My gf was laughing because from the moment I got in the Q60 I was picking the car apart.
Edit: now that I took a closer look, I dont know what car it is. I swear that the car I was sitting in was a G37, but when I checked the badge it said q60, yet it looks nothing like the pics in this thread? hmmm
Edit: now that I took a closer look, I dont know what car it is. I swear that the car I was sitting in was a G37, but when I checked the badge it said q60, yet it looks nothing like the pics in this thread? hmmm
#95
Well, it has to be remembered that automotive "reliability" is measured in today's terms, where, by the standards of several decades ago, almost all vehicles today could be considered reliable. I clearly remember (and unfortunately, owned) some vehicles from the late 70s and 80s that, compared to even today's "unreliable" cars such as the Nissans we are talking about, couldn't hold a candle to them. It makes you wonder how those cars back then ever got off the assembly lines.
1997 Nissan maxima. - http://www.carsurvey.org/reviews/nis...7/single-page/
2004 Renault/Nissan Maxima - http://www.carsurvey.org/reviews/nis...4/single-page/
The reliability difference is like night and day.
#96
I sat in one at the dealer, for a 50k + car the interior build quality and material are terrible. Went to the Lexus show room after and a fully optioned out IS250AWD at 47k was many times better. My gf was laughing because from the moment I got in the Q60 I was picking the car apart.
Edit: now that I took a closer look, I dont know what car it is. I swear that the car I was sitting in was a G37, but when I checked the badge it said q60, yet it looks nothing like the pics in this thread? hmmm
Edit: now that I took a closer look, I dont know what car it is. I swear that the car I was sitting in was a G37, but when I checked the badge it said q60, yet it looks nothing like the pics in this thread? hmmm
the pics in this thread on of the 3rd gen G coupe (now Q60) that will be introduced next week...
#97
If I'm not mistaken, they will still be sellin the g-series sedans alongside the q50.
#98
Lexus Test Driver
#99
Then I will still keep my opinion that their q60 was a POS (current gen) for the price point lol
#100
Lead Lap
When it came out it was just fine given the performance and reliability it offered. It was even Consumer Reports approved. The car is just old.
#102
Driver School Candidate
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: bc
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#105
Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NY
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Infiniti Q60 Concept previews sexy styling, twin-turbo V6
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/01/11/i...bo-v6-detroit/
http://www.autoblog.com/2015/01/11/i...bo-v6-detroit/